Start A Petition

Canadian Jewish Groups Charity Status Revoked: Report

Business  (tags: Beth Oloth donations, ethics, Canada, charity status revocation, international law, Palestinian human rights violations, Jewish National Fund (JNF) of Canada, law, Canadian Revenue Agency (CRA), Canadian Global News, illegal settlements, israel armed forces )

- 81 days ago -
A government audit finds Beth Oloth donations supported Israeli armed forces and illegal settlements, broadcaster says


We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


fly bird (26)
Monday January 28, 2019, 10:14 pm
A Canadian Jewish organisation has been stripped of its charity status following a government audit which found it provided support to the Israeli armed forces, Canadian Global News has reported.

(VIDEO: Inside story. 24:59)

The Canadian Revenue Agency (CRA) found that the Beth Oloth Charitable Organisation had been funding activities that aren't charitable under Canadian law, including "increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of the Israeli armed forces", the Global News website reported.

The Beth Oloth Charitable Organisation based in Toronto has been a registered charity since 1980 and was one of Canada's richest, with more than 60 million Canadian dollars ($45m) in revenues in 2017.

According to documents obtained by Global News, federal regulators found many problems, including funding projects totalling 1.2 million Canadian dollars ($905,000) in the occupied Palestinian territories, which it said violated Canada's official policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

However, the portion listing the projects was blacked out by the CRA.

According to the CRA Charities Directorate, the organisation hadn't issued tax receipts properly and lacked "direction and control" over the use of its funds.

Activities included funding educational programmes known as mechinot that prepared high school students for Israeli military service, Global News reported.

The programmes provide weapons training, physical and martial arts training, mentoring by Israeli forces officers and visits to army bases and sites of landmark battles, the CRA wrote.

The CRA released 94 pages of documents regarding the case on Friday following the announcement of the group's charity status revocation on January 12.

Global News reported that Beth Oloth has received vast donations - 61 million Canadian dollars ($46m) in 2017, 45 million Canadian dollars ($34m) in 2016 and 42 million Canadian dollars ($32m) in 2015, of which almost all its money went abroad.

The CRA said that Beth Oloth was acting as a "conduit" that issued tax receipts to donors in Canada in order to fund programmes of others.

Beth Oloth said it only funded teachers to provide religious training at mechinot schools and claimed they provided "stipends to the poor for the observance of religious life" which doesn't interfere with Canada's policy in the region, according to documents seen by Global News.

But the CRA rejected their explanation, the Canadian broadcaster reported.

"Providing assistance to Israeli settlements in the occupied territories serves to encourage and enhance the permanency of the infrastructure and settlements and therefore is contrary to Canada's public policy and international law on this issue," the agency wrote.

'Era of impunity ... coming to an end'

Toronto charity lawyer Mark Blumberg told Global News that reading the details of the case was "shocking" and the government should be embarrassed the charity was allowed to operate for so long.

"This is an example of the type of 'efficient' charity we don't need in Canada. It is efficient at giving out tax receipts but not effective in making sure that the 200 million Canadian dollars ($151m) of tax-subsidised dollars was spent appropriately," Blumberg said on Sunday.

The lawyer called it an example of "very poor governance and compliance" and a wake-up call to donors. He said it highlighted the importance of rules governing charitable work abroad.

Earlier in January, Canadian broadcaster CBC reported that the charity Jewish National Fund (JNF) of Canada has likewise been under audit by the CRA for supporting Israel's armed forces and its illegal settlements.

The JNF said it had stopped doing so since 2016 but it still remains a government registered charity.

According to Independent Jewish Voices (IJV) Canada, JNF Canada has been the subject of CRA-directed complaints for over four decades and has been violating Canadian tax law for over 50 years.

IJV has been campaigning for the JNF to have its charitable status revoked as it supports the Israeli military and settlements, denies access to land for Palestinians and contributes to their displacement.

Corey Balsam, IJV's national coordinator, said on Monday that the group is hopeful the "era of impunity for Canadian organisations that support the Israeli occupation is finally coming to an end".

"It's about time the CRA cleaned house and applied its own rules to these organisations," Balsam said in a statement released on Monday.

"Given the wealth of evidence against it and that it is already under audit, we expect JNF Canada to be next."

fly bird (26)
Monday January 28, 2019, 10:20 pm
Palestinians lose eviction appeal in Jerusalem.

The property is in the Sheikh Jarrah neighbourhood of East Jerusalem, which has long been targeted by Israeli settler groups.

Dozens of Palestinians fear they are about to be forcibly evicted from the homes they've lived in since the 1950s.

And hundreds more face a similar fate in the same neighbourhood of occupied East Jerusalem.

Campaigners say their plight is part of a systematic process by Jewish settlers to take over the city.

Al Jazeera's Harry Fawcett reports.


fly bird (26)
Monday January 28, 2019, 10:21 pm
Video - above 2:16

fly bird (26)
Tuesday January 29, 2019, 11:47 pm
Decades of Displacing Palestinians: How Israel Does It
Munir Nuseibah June 18, 2013


Most discussion of Palestinian dispossession – including by Palestinians themselves – focuses on the 1948 Nakba and the forced exile of more than 700,000 Palestinians by Zionist forces intent on creating an Israeli state in mandate Palestine. However, the various measures that Israel has used to forcibly displace Palestinians since 1948 have received far less attention even though it is estimated that it has forcibly displaced 66% of the whole Palestinian population as part of its deliberate, longstanding plan to create and maintain a Jewish majority. 1

Al-Shabaka Policy Advisor Munir Nuseibah has identified six of the methods Israel uses to displace Palestinians, and discusses two – displacement by personal status engineering as well as by urban planning. He argues that the traditional human rights approach to the conflict is not enough. Rather, he calls on human rights advocates and organizations to apply the more recently developed transitional justice approach to deal with the mass human rights violations carried out as a matter of policy, as this is the only way toward meaningful redress and just peace.

The Missing Context for Claiming Rights

As shown in archival research conducted by the Israeli new historians, senior leaders of the Zionist movement have long advocated the “transfer” of Palestinians in order to secure a Jewish majority in an area of land where Jews were the minority. The founders of the State of Israel and their heirs translated these calls into policy and practice using a variety of methods that continue to the present day. 2 Yet Israel’s motives and the systematic nature of population transfer have not been addressed. For example, the 1993 Declaration of Principles between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, which makes reference to “refugees” as one of the issues for permanent status negotiations, makes no mention of thousands of other displaced victims eligible for redress. (Needless to say, the rights of the refugees have not been addressed nor have any remedies been offered.)

It is common, in the rights-based approach literature to focus on war refugees separately from other waves of displacement. In the Palestinian context, however, it is vital to situate war refugees within the macro-picture of the conflict. As Raef Zreik notes, “the Palestinians have lost not only their rights and their land, but also the context that enables them to demand these rights in a way that makes sense.” 3 The Palestinian refugees of 1947-48 and 1967 cannot “just” be seen as war refugees. They are victims of a racist policy of population transfer implemented under the cover of war and other sets of victims have been created in line with the same macro-policy.

The application of a transitional justice framework to the Palestinian-Israeli context can address the missing context Zreik identifies. The transitional justice framework has now been used in other conflicts but it has been not sufficiently studied in the case of Palestine, even though it offers a way to comprehensively redress the victims of gross human rights violations, as will be discussed in the final section of this policy brief.

Israel’s Six Methods of Forcible Displacement

Israel has utilized its legal system and institutions from the day it was established to this day in order to inflict forced displacement within the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) as well as within Israel. Its methods can be divided into at least six general categories and have led to permanent displacement of Palestinians from both sides of the Green Line.
•The use of violence during times of war as happened during the wars of 1948, 1956 and 1967, which created one of the most complicated refugee problems in the world as well as a significant number of internally displaced persons.
•Engineering of personal statuses in Israel and the OPT in a way that excludes habitual residents, or persons who should be entitled to residency rights, from the right to live in their homes.
•Discriminatory urban and country planning that encourages Jewish expansion and suppresses Palestinian construction in certain areas such as Jerusalem, the Jordan Valley and the Negev desert. As a result, homes and even whole villages are demolished as “illegal constructions.”
•Dispossessing Palestinians of their property under discriminatory laws and regulations that result in the forced eviction of families from their places of residence.
•Deportations under security justifications and emergency law. This method was extensively used in the OPT at the start of the occupation and is still being used from time to time.
•Creating unbearable circumstances in certain areas that eventually drive the civilian population to leave their homes and move to other areas. Examples of this pattern include Sheikh Sa’ad village in Jerusalem and Al-Nu’man village in the West Bank where both communities were suffocated by the construction of the Separation Wall.

All six methods of displacement have contributed to the forcible removal of the Palestinian civilian population either internally within the borders of Palestine/Israel or across international borders. It is estimated that by the end of 2011 Israel had forcibly displaced around 66% of the whole Palestinian population. Two of the methods Israel has used – personal status engineering and urban planning – are examined in more detail below.

Displacement by Personal Status Engineering

In the aftermath of the 1948 war Israel used personal status definitions to make the demographic changes needed to turn the Jewish minority in the areas it had conquered during the war into a majority. It introduced discriminatory citizenship laws in a way that would exclude all the refugees from acquiring its citizenship. Two laws regulated Israeli citizenship: the Law of Return of 1950 and the Citizenship Law of 1952. Together, the two statutes gave all Jews around the world the privileged status of Jewish “nationals” of Israel with the right to immigrate to Israel and become full citizens, while according “citizenship” to Palestinians who had remained in Israel. 4 The laws excluded all Palestinian refugees although they had been residing in the area that became Israel for centuries before the establishment of the state. 5 Israel’s 1954 Prevention of Infiltration (Offences and Jurisdiction) Law also served to criminalize any attempted return of a refugee to his/her home.

In the aftermath of the 1967 war, Israel introduced similar measures through the military-legal system by which it managed the occupation. Shortly after the war, during which around one third of the population was displaced, Israel took a census in the OPT. It then introduced a new system of Palestinian residency that excluded anyone who was not part of this census regardless of his or her links to the OPT. Israel then enacted a number of “prevention of infiltration” military orders that criminalized any unauthorized return in a way that was almost identical to the above-mentioned 1954 law, thus cementing the displacement of the 1967 refugees.

The policy of defining new rules for residency and then criminalizing any Palestinian who attempted to return to his/her home was not the end of Israel’s personal status engineering. Following its occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, Israel annexed East Jerusalem and introduced three different types of residency status for the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The inhabitants of the OPT who were counted in the census received Israeli-issued identification cards (ID cards) with three different colors: Red for the Gaza Strip, orange for the West Bank and blue for East Jerusalem. The inhabitants of East Jerusalem were given an Israeli permanent residency status and were ruled under Israeli domestic law and legal jurisdiction, while the rest of the inhabitants were considered residents of their territories and were ruled under an Israeli military regime.

Both legal systems included ways to revoke the residency status. In the West Bank and Gaza, exit permits with an expiry date were given to those who travelled abroad. If the traveler failed to return before the expiry of the permit, his/her status would be assigned as “ceased residency” and they would not be allowed to return. This policy of residency revocation stopped in the West Bank and Gaza Strip after the beginning of the peace process.

In East Jerusalem, the residency revocation policy was similar in its effect to the one in the West Bank and Gaza, although it functioned according to Israeli domestic legal jurisdiction, not military law. Jerusalemites also needed exit permits when they travelled abroad and they lost their residency status if they failed to return before the expiry of the permit. However, unlike the residents of the West bank and Gaza, the peace process did not provide any protection for Jerusalem residents. On the contrary, Israel evolved the legal framework in a way that facilitated an accelerating rate of residency revocations.

Prior to the peace process, Israel used to revoke the residency status of Jerusalemites when they were considered to have “left Israel and settled in a country outside Israel.” 6 The Entry into Israel Regulations defined a settlement outside Israel for the purposes of revocation as: living abroad for 7 years, receiving a residency status in a foreign country, or receiving a citizenship in that country by naturalization. Residence in the West Bank and Gaza was not considered a settlement outside Israel.

Once the peace process started, however, Israel suddenly changed the revocation rules without introducing any official legal amendments and without warning the public. Suddenly, it started using a new criterion to interpret one’s residence outside Israel known as the “center of life.” According to this new policy, if it were shown that the Jerusalemite’s “center of life” was outside Israel, then he/she would be liable to have his/her residency revoked. Even worse, residence in the West Bank or Gaza Strip was considered to be residence abroad, putting the residency of thousands of Palestinians who had established their homes in the suburbs of Jerusalem in danger. According to figures provided by the Israeli Ministry of Interior, the residencies of 14,152 Palestinians had been revoked between 1967 and 2011, more than 11,000 after the beginning of the peace process. These figures greatly understate the Palestinian loss of residency rights. For example, they only include partial data for 1967 – 1990 as noted by the Israeli Interior Ministry itself. 7 Moreover, the harsh “center of life” policy has and is being rigorously applied.

In addition to revocation of residency, Israel has also introduced limits on child registration. These limits apply not just to residents of East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza; they also apply to the Palestinian citizens of Israel. Regarding its own citizens, Israel prevents the automatic granting of citizenship to children of Israeli citizens born abroad. Although this applies to Jewish and non-Jewish citizens alike, a Jewish child can always acquire his citizenship by virtue of “return”, whereas a non-Jewish infant does not enjoy this right.

The conditions ruling registration of Jerusalem children are more complicated and restrictive. Since the Palestinian inhabitants of Jerusalem are not citizens of Israel, they cannot automatically pass their residency on to their children. Between 1967 and 1994, the Israeli Ministry of Interior refused to register the children of female residents on the basis that children should take their father’s status. Currently, if both parents are residents, the Ministry of Interior registers the child, but this is not granted as a right. In fact, Israel has steadily increased the restrictions on giving children permanent residency status in cases where only one parent is a resident and where the child was born abroad, thus effectively reducing the number of Jerusalemite children registered. In 2002, Israel started to handle the applications to register Jerusalemite children born abroad as family unification cases, which was also the case in the West Bank and Gaza.

At the same time, the Israeli government decided to stop processing family unification applications by Palestinian citizens of Israel as well as by Palestinian Jerusalemites to be joined by their Palestinian spouses from the West Bank or Gaza Strip. Israel also made it more difficult to register a child who was born in Israel if only one of his parents was a resident, a policy that further affected Jerusalemites. A Palestinian non-governmental organization estimated in 2003 that these restrictions had resulted in more than 10,000 unregistered children in East Jerusalem, but there is no other source of data regarding the outcome of this under-reported tool for the forced displacement of Palestinians. It should be noted that similar restrictions were introduced to the registration of children in the West Bank and Gaza even after the Palestinian Authority was established in 1994.

Displacement by Urban Planning

Urban planning is another method that Israel has used consistently on both sides of the Green Line from the establishment of the state to the present day to displace Palestinians and replace them with Jewish colonists. In the Negev desert, for example, the majority of the civilian population was displaced during the 1948 war and as a result of forced displacements during the 1950s. Yet Israel is still targeting the residents of this area and town planning is currently the method of choice. The Israeli government has refused to recognize dozens of Palestinian Bedouin villages and towns, some of which were in existence before 1948, while others had been established as a result of Israel’s previous displacement policies. It is determined to implement a plan that would result in the destruction of some 35 Bedouin villages and to forcibly displace the Bedouin into concentrated spaces, “developing” the area for Jewish expansion.

It is worth noting that the Bedouin are also among the Palestinian population groups displaced in the OPT to make way for Jewish colonization that is illegal under international law. The Bedouin have been continuously displaced from around Jerusalem, for example, in order to expand the Ma’ale Adumim settlement which holds some 40,000 Jewish colonists. The Israeli Government plans to further expand the settlement in the direction of Jerusalem. This will displace the Jahhalin Bedouin who had already been previously displaced from Tal ‘Arad in the Negev.

Much has been written about Israel’s colonization of the West Bank and East Jerusalem, which uses urban planning methods similar to the ones described above, but is worth noting the particularly important role urban planning plays in displacing Palestinians in illegally annexed East Jerusalem. Since the beginning of the 1967 occupation, Israel has confiscated 35% of the Palestinian lands in East Jerusalem and allocated them to Jewish colonization. Israel has also used zoning policies to declare 22% of Palestinian land as “green areas” on which Palestinians were not allowed to build. Currently, only 13% of the total area of East Jerusalem is zoned for Palestinian construction, and most of it is already built and inhabited. Israel considers any construction without a permit “illegal” and frequently demolishes such constructions, causing forced displacement of the inhabitants.

A Systematic Policy of Forced Displacement from the Start

As seen in the above discussion and in the examples given of methods of displacement, Israel’s discriminatory policy of forced displacement of Palestinians has been systematic and continuous, and is grounded in the very ethos of the establishment of the state. The significance of this understanding will come into play when a genuine peace process is launched. In the Palestinian context, there is no justification to focus on war refugees and to ignore the victims of the various methods of displacement, all of which feed into a deliberate overarching policy to forcibly replace the indigenous inhabitants by colonizers from among Israel’s existing Jewish population or recent Jewish immigrants.

A genuine peace process will make it necessary to move beyond the traditional human rights framework and to apply a transitional justice one to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The transitional justice framework offers a holistic approach not just to provide measures of redress but also to enable the identification of the human rights violations that must be redressed. For example, in Timor-Leste, the Truth Commission had a comprehensive mandate that required it to investigate the “context, causes, antecedents, motives and perspectives which led to the violations” as well as “whether they were part of a systematic pattern or abuse” and “whether they were the result of deliberate planning, policy or authorisation on the part of the state, political groups, militia groups, liberation movements or other groups or individuals.” 8

Without such a comprehensive understanding of the violations, it would be impossible to meaningfully redress the victims of human rights violations and to stop the crimes. In addition to the myriad other problems associated with it, the Oslo “peace process” totally ignored many of the methods and waves of deportation and transfer of civilians; indeed, forced displacement actually increased after the peace process started.

Human rights organizations, academics, and practitioners should redraw the picture as they identify the elements that should be tackled in a transitional phase to peace and justice in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The comprehensive examination of the human rights violations is essential not only to understand them per se but also to prescribe the appropriate remedies, including the legal and institutional reforms that are essential to meaningful redress, as is clear from examples given above. The mistakes of Oslo must not be repeated: No peace can ever be established while discriminatory laws and institutions are engaged in producing an ever greater number of victims.

Danuta W (1251)
Wednesday January 30, 2019, 3:01 am

fly bird (26)
Friday February 1, 2019, 7:28 am
Canada strips charitable status from group funding Israeli army.
January 31, 2019

Canada has revoked the charitable status of a Zionist organization that funneled money to projects supporting the Israeli army.

The Toronto-based Beth Oloth Charitable Organization, a group without an online footprint, “had been a registered charity since 1980 and was one of richest in Canada,” with more than US$45 million in 2017 revenues, according to Canada’s Global News.

It appeared “to be acting as a ‘conduit’ that issued tax receipts to donors in Canada to fund the programs of others,” the report adds.

Beth Oloth funded programs called mechinot that prepare Israeli high school students for military conscription, and which include weapons training, mentoring by Israeli soldiers and visits to army bases.

Using charitable donations to fund foreign militaries contravenes Canadian law.

“It is our position that these pre-army mechinot exist to provide support” to Israel’s army, the Canada Revenue Agency states, and that funds given to these programs “are therefore in support of foreign armed forces.”

The revenue agency “also identified a list of other problems such as funding projects in the occupied territories, which it said was contrary to Canada’s policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” Global News reported.

The revenue agency recently announced it was investigating the charitable status of the Jewish National Fund of Canada after human rights activists filed complaints over the organization’s role in Israeli human rights violations.

Activists say that like Beth Oloth’s scheme, JNF Canada acts as a conduit for its parent organization, the Jewish National Fund, to funnel money donated by Canadians for projects linked to the Israeli army and to support Israeli policies of expulsion, land theft and discrimination.

The government’s action against Beth Oloth is a hopeful sign “that the era of impunity for Canadian organizations that support the Israeli occupation is finally coming to an end,” said Corey Balsam of Independent Jewish Voices Canada, an activist group that has mobilized to hold JNF Canada accountable for years.

While the revenue agency should be commended for stripping Beth Oloth of its charitable status, JNF Canada “invests tremendously in political protection,” Rabbi David Mivasair of Independent Jewish Voices Canada told The Electronic Intifada.

Mivasair said that while top-level Canadian politicians have long supported JNF Canada and its projects, the charity “works hard to maintain its good-guy image,” touting itself as an environmentally friendly organization.

As activists have documented in their latest complaint, the government has so far failed to hold JNF Canada accountable for any of its actions.

But the decision to strip Beth Oloth of its charitable status could be a sign that Canadian tax authorities are taking their mandate to enforce the law more seriously.

“Given the wealth of evidence against it and that it is already under audit, we expect JNF Canada to be next,” Balsam said.

fly bird (26)
Saturday February 2, 2019, 5:15 pm
BTS Testimonies: “You hate everyone.”
February 2, 2019

{Breaking the Silence is an organization of veteran combatants who have served in the Israeli military since the start of the Second Intifada, and have taken it upon themselves to expose the Israeli public to the reality of everyday life in the Occupied Territories. They endeavor to stimulate public debate about the price paid for a reality in which young soldiers face a civilian population on a daily basis, and are engaged in the control of that population’s everyday life. Their work aims to bring an end to the occupation.}

catalog number: 103402
Rank: Sergeant
Unit: Nahal Brigade
Area: Hebron
period: 2004 – 2006
Settler violence

I remember seeing those kids in Hebron and feeling proud that they’re afraid. These are kids I’m talking about, like, really. And who were they afraid of? The Jewish kids. They don’t do anything, but the Jewish kids throw rocks at them when they pass by. The Jewish parents don’t say a word. The parents stand around, and you see a little Jewish kid throwing stones and yelling something at the Arab kids, and it was just routine. You come to Tel Rumeida and you see it every day, and it’s okay, it’s acceptable. And the parents, I don’t know if they’re the parents, but adults walk around and they don’t say a word to the kids.

It doesn’t seem strange to you that a kid throws a stone at another kid?

Because one’s a Jew and the other’s a Palestinian, it’s as if it’s okay.

Did you also see the opposite, a Palestinian throwing a stone at a Jew?

I remember that I’d say that it was kind of okay, but to myself I’d think, come on, what is he, retarded? That guy didn’t do anything to him. I’d think, this is what causes the whole mess, these little fights, these things that the Jews start. I know their parents teach them to hate them, and so they legitimize throwing rocks and cursing at them. It’s the kind of thing you see on TV. So it’s clear there’ll be a mess afterward. And you don’t understand which side you’re on. In Hebron it’s the strangest thing, you don’t know which side you’re on. I’m a Jewish Israeli soldier, and I’m supposed to be against the Arabs because they’re my enemy, but I’m here, next to a settler’s house in the base, and I start thinking that I’m not on their side, that the Jews aren’t right. So wait, so no, I have to flip a switch in my brain so I can keep hating Arabs and justifying what the Jews do. But no, wait, I still can’t agree with the Jews, because they started it, it’s because of them that we’re here, and it’s because of them that all this is happening, because they disturb them and they’re afraid. It’s terrible, all of this . . .

So why flip the switch?

Because you have to be loyal to your side.

How old are the kids you’re talking about?

Young, like five or six. The ones who run around outside.

Were the adults ever violent?

I remember one incident. We were on a bus, it was during the disengagement, and I don’t remember what the story was, but there was some settler woman on the bus who they said was crazy. Her husband or boyfriend had been killed by a terrorist, or something like that, so she was screaming at one of the soldiers who wouldn’t give her a place to sit. I remember he was concentrating on controlling himself, restraining himself, and she was hitting him, I think. He held back and held back, and then at a certain point he yelled at her, “Shut up, it’s because of you that I have to be here.” They hated being there.

The soldiers?

Yes. I think they were mad at the settlers and at the residents of Hebron. They were angry.

Don’t the settlers bring you pizza at the post and all kinds of stuff like that?

They do, but every so often I’d hear the soldiers say, “It’s because of these shits that we’re here, they should get out of here, they should leave.” On the one hand there’s that—again, you’re mad at your country that the settlers are here, that the Jews are here. On the other hand, you also hate the Arabs, because they kill your friends and make trouble for you.

So you hate everyone?

Yes. And so I think that you don’t think—you say whatever comes into your head at the moment: now I hate this, so I’ll curse at him, and then I hate that, so I’ll curse at him, and now I hate him, so I’ll spit on him.

You spat on Jews?

No, why? They didn’t do anything to me.

What about the Arabs?

But they’re like, Arabs . . . I don’t know, it’s true, the guy I spat on didn’t do anything to me. I think he didn’t do anything at all. But again, it was cool, and it was the one thing I could do to, you know, I can’t go and arrest people and be proud that I caught a terrorist, and I can’t kill a terrorist, and I can’t go on some operation and find some weapons under some tile in their house. But I can spit on them and humiliate them and ridicule them.

IMEMC: “Breaking the Silence”
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Business

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.