Start A Petition

Supreme Court DOMA Case: Justices Sounded Skeptical Of Law's Constitutionality, Purpose

US Politics & Gov't  (tags: gayrights, politics, education, americans, Society, society, obama, SupremeCourt, government, usa, media, news, americans, SupremeCourt )

- 2304 days ago -
A majority of Supreme Court justices on Wednesday morning appeared skeptical of the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defines marriage for federal purposes as between a man and a woman...


We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


lee e (114)
Thursday March 28, 2013, 10:31 am
What's to be "skeptical" about -- seems quite clear that "all men are created equal" - or did I misread my copy of the Constitution?

mar l ene dinkins (264)
Thursday March 28, 2013, 10:59 am
notato Cal!!!!! thnx !!!

Patricia McCaskill (139)
Thursday March 28, 2013, 11:21 am
agree. well said lee!

Fred Krohn (34)
Thursday March 28, 2013, 1:19 pm
The Disease of Marriage Act was another Klinton mistake and should be trashed along with everything else Draft Dodger Willie the walking election fraud did.

Judith Hand (55)
Thursday March 28, 2013, 1:38 pm
Noted. Seems to be a balanced report. The law issues confuse me; it'll be interesting to see how they work through it.

Birgit W (160)
Thursday March 28, 2013, 1:51 pm

Sandra ;atterson (59)
Thursday March 28, 2013, 4:12 pm

pam w (139)
Thursday March 28, 2013, 4:35 pm
What Lee said.....when did it become ''constitutional'' to deny rights to U S citizens?

Oh, wait....when religious fanatics attempted to take over the government....that's when!

Lois Jordan (63)
Thursday March 28, 2013, 4:46 pm
Noted. Thanks, Cal. I've been signing many letters & petitions to "dump DOMA" along with thousands of others, and am glad the message is getting through. As a legally married human being, I believe it's the right of any human being to legally marry whoever they want. Period.

Robert Pavlick (8)
Thursday March 28, 2013, 6:53 pm
One wonders why President Clinton, who was supposed to be so "gay-friendly" ever signed the Defence of Marriage Act in the first place. Why didn't he veto it?

Edvanir L (77)
Thursday March 28, 2013, 8:17 pm
It looks like DOMA is over, but according to what I've seen, the court can rule that federal government can't regulate marriage. If it happens, the States can do whatever they want. I really hope it doesn't happen.

Tim C (2420)
Friday March 29, 2013, 11:10 am

Ro H (0)
Friday March 29, 2013, 2:29 pm

cathie S (154)
Friday March 29, 2013, 6:11 pm
noted n shared
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in US Politics & Gov't

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.