Start A Petition

New Proposal Would Provide Grand Juries With Eyes ~ THE BOROWITZ REPORT ~ SATIRE

Society & Culture  (tags: Americans, humor, satire, media, grand juries, sight, brains, education, society, freedoms, interesting, humans )

- 1541 days ago -
"Body cameras are an important part of the solution," said Harland Dorrinson, who is lobbying Washington to equip grand juries with the sense of sight. "But I strongly believe that if you take video evidence and add eyes, the combination would be...


We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Arielle S (313)
Wednesday December 3, 2014, 4:16 pm
Once again Andy is so close to the truth, he's almost not funny. But if we can't laugh, we're in even deeper trouble...loved the part about adding working brains, too.

Kathleen M (210)
Wednesday December 3, 2014, 4:36 pm
Noted, caught between a laugh and a wince...Andy has done it again! Thanks for sharing, Carrie.

Katie & Bill D (107)
Wednesday December 3, 2014, 10:24 pm
Thank you Carrie

Arild Gone for now (174)
Thursday December 4, 2014, 3:32 am
It's preferable to have a brain than eyes.

Lady S (446)
Thursday December 4, 2014, 8:36 am
*Sits on Santa's lap* Okay, I won't lie and say I've been a good girl all year. But I'm better than these jokes on Grand Juries that allow murderers to go free. All I want for Christmas is to get rid of Grand Juries completely. If that is not possible, I will settle for renaming them. They is nothing GRAND about them. They should be renamed the STUPID juries.

Lona Goudswaard (66)
Thursday December 4, 2014, 11:13 am
It's a good thing you add ~ THE BOROWITZ REPORT ~ SATIRE to your title, otherwise we might have mistaken it for the report of a real suggestion. LOL Come to think of should have been a real suggestion.

Sheila D (194)
Thursday December 4, 2014, 11:24 am
Think Brains would be better...seems they have nothing upstairs to make rational decisions with.

Lois Jordan (63)
Thursday December 4, 2014, 3:50 pm
Thanks for the dose of Andy, Carrie. But, it is a bit confusing when learning that Grand Juries did indict all of the cases prior to the recent ones. So, I'm wondering if it was the way they were "instructed," or something else......Many have placed blamed on prosecutors. Since they have to work with the police forces, they can't be seen as anti-law enforcement. This is where the federal gov't must step in.
A few have spoken about the fact that officers have been trained not only in these military-type techniques; but also trained to respond with excessive force. Major systemic change is definitely in order.

Past Member (0)
Friday December 5, 2014, 7:33 am
Thank you for posting...
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Society & Culture

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.