my care2
make a difference

community & fun

groups

get together & make a difference

 
 
 The Cancer Business September 15, 2007 4:56 AM

In the UK, at the present time, around one third of general hospital patients are suffering from cancer: two out of five of the population have, or will develop, the disease. The UK citizen, born in the year 2010 may well face a situation whereby they are more likely to develop cancer, at sometime, than they are to avoid it. The theoretical 100% cancer incidence is due long before the end of the century.
 The five year survival figures, not to be confused with the successful treatment of the disease, for the major cancers are:-
Stomach 5%
 Trachea, bronchus and lung 5%
 Breast 50%
 Oesophagus 5%
 Large intestine 22%
 Pancreas 4%
 Liver 2% (1) There has been no significant increase in survival rates since records began.
The cancer business is second only, in size, to its big brother, petrochemicals. In the 20 years from 1970 to 1990, in the USA alone, the cancer business was worth an estimated 1 trillion dollars ($1,000,000,000,000) (2). If the same percentage of the overall disease bill applies in Britain as in the US, the current (2003) expenditure on cancer will be 4 to 8 billion pounds per year.
With these kind of amounts involved it is quite understandable why the drug/radiation/scalpel/vivisection cancer cartel have maintained a constant, ruthless campaign to suffocate, at birth, any and all attempts to introduce rational therapeutic regimes to deal with the species-threatening plague.
 The definition of cure in cancer is the restoration of the cancer defence mechanisms and the elimination of cancer through these mechanisms. If this restoration is not possible, the next best is the constant support, through safe, natural means, of the body's attempts to keep the disease at bay. Neither of these is supplied by orthodox cancer treatment.
 The cancer research fund-raisers' definition of cancer cure is the apparent lack of symptoms for five years. If, or when, the patient dies a year or two after the five years, from the effects of the treatment, they remain in the "cure" statistics: cured and dead at the same time.
"THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY AND THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, AS A SHOWCASE PROJECT OF THE 'WAR ON CANCER', CO-SPONSORED A MASSIVE X-RAY SCREENING PROGRAM FOR BREAST CANCER - ON 280,000 WOMEN - THE NOTORIOUS MAMMOGRAPHY FOLLIES. WITH KIND SMILES AND POLYANNA COUNSEL, WOMEN WERE ENCOURAGED TO AFFIRM THEIR VIRTUE ON THE ALTAR OF TECHNOLOGY BY EXPOSING THEMSELVES TO PERIODIC RADIATION KNOWN TO INCREASE THE RISK OF THE DISEASE...EMPHASIS WAS PLACED ON RADIATING WOMEN OVER 50, THE VERY AGE GROUP THAT WOULD BE MOST VULNERABLE TO INDUCTION OF CANCER BY RADIATION."
"...still the money pours in for 'Cancer Research' from kind-hearted, well meaning people in spite of the fact that the much-advertised 'cures' and 'discoveries' invariably turn out, year after year, to be no cure at all but rather an aggravation of the trouble, the proof of this being the steady increase of the disease on all sides...Surely there should be some result to show as a partial excuse for the torturing of so many animals...the public still does not realise that nothing is likely to happen, no progress ever likely or even possible whilst the research is done on demonstrably wrong lines." Morley Steynor,
Since these words, countless billions of pounds/dollars/animals have been squandered, whilst the disease has steadily reached the point of seriously threatening the continuation of the human species. Clearly, even given the level of intelligence of the research laboratory inmates, the situation could not possibly be explained by sheer, crass stupidity alone.
"A SOLUTION TO CANCER WOULD MEAN THE TERMINATION OF RESEARCH PROGRAMS, THE OBSOLESCENCE OF SKILLS, THE END OF DREAMS OF PERSONAL GLORY. TRIUMPH OVER CANCER WOULD DRY UP CONTRIBUTIONS TO SELF-PERPETUATING CHARITIES...IT WOULD MORTALLY THREATEN THE PRESENT CLINICAL ESTABLISHMENT BY RENDERING OBSOLETE THE EXPENSIVE SURGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL AND CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC TREATMENTS IN WHICH SO MUCH MONEY, TRAINING AND EQUIPMENT IS INVESTED...THE NEW THERAPY MUST BE DISBELIEVED, DENIED, DISCOURAGED AND DISALLOWED AT ALL COSTS; REGARDLESS OF ACTUAL TESTING RESULTS AND, PREFERABLY, WITHOUT ANY TESTING AT ALL."Excerpts from 'The Cancer Business'
http://www.bava.org.uk/CancerBusinesspt1.html
 [ send green star]
 
 June 25, 2008 2:11 PM

in other words, this industry will never die off or go away unless or until humans can evolve past our egos and greedy natures?



This post was modified from its original form on 25 Jun, 14:12  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Not if I can help it Jodi June 26, 2008 3:03 AM

Many people are slowly waking up to the fraud of these so-called 'research' charities. It is difficult tho when the media help them to fool the public with their manipulated statistics and false claims of success and the ever present dangling carrot of that 'miracle cure' that is always round the next corner as it has been since their inception and will ever be until their demise.

 [ send green star]
 
 September 12, 2009 9:49 AM

http://naturaltreatmentsforcancer.blogspot.com  

I found this in another group and it is very,very enlightening...

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
  New Topic              Back To Topics Read Code of Conduct

 

This group:
Cancer Research Research
322 Members

View All Topics
New Topic

Track Topic
Mail Preferences


Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved