That is all. Thank you for reading.
That's too bad, because I know some great spots on Care2 to watch them.
Oh, watching them is fun. Having to fend them off whenever you express your opinion, on the other hand, is getting old.
For some reason I never tire of that. Maybe you get round up some of them and bring them here for me. I'm banned from all their groups.
I admire that. It irritates me no end when people twist what I say and then try to demonize me for it. I wish I didn't care.
Want me to crush some skulls? I'm good at that.
You would do that for me?
It would be my pleasure.
Hey Z, good to see you here.
Well, aren't you just as sweet as a Georgia peach, Jeffrey!
This post was modified from its original form on 09 Jul, 16:58
I shouldn't name any names. Wouldn't be nice.
I am indeed. Email me and I'll take care of it.
"For some reason I never tire of that. Maybe you get round up some of them and bring them here for me. I'm banned from all their groups."
Because he gets PAID to! LOL!!
Speaking of idiots, evidently a freind who WAs in the old AP group got banned by mentioning your name to one of the hosts......Jeffery, I visit hear, (care2), rarely because of such nonsense, how do you stand it???
There are many groups where I am referred to as "He Who Cannot Be Named". I find it amusing.
I looked in on AP a couple weeks ago, and found exactly what I had predicted. Just a few like-minded posters and one or two name-callers. Not terribly interesting or worthwhile.
Jeffrey, I didn't know you get paid to... well, whatever you apparently get paid to do (crush skulls?). Would I have gotten an exorbitant bill if I'd taken you up on your offer?
No, for you it's free.
Where have you been?
Taking classes. I woke up dreaming about hearsay. By the way, your penultimate comment above is hearsay. But it's likely covered by an exception: FRE 803(21), if I remember correctly. Are you Voldemort or the bad guy from Lord of the Rings? (Whose name I can't even remember... that's how little his name was spoken!)
So sue me.
I never read any Tolkien. I'm an adult.
You don't sue over hearsay. You object. And then it's not admitted into evidence. (Or it is.)
Tolkien is for adults!!!!!
Then object away. Anyway, when I say it it's truth, not hearsay. I'm Jeffrey.
And I was just kidding about being an adult. I never really grew up.
It's being truth doesn't make it not hearsay. If you offer it in evidence for its truth, all the more reason it is hearsay.
I don't really object. You can offer all the hearsay you want as far as I'm concerned. I was merely pointing out that it is hearsay, and you placed your own values on that assertion.
This post was modified from its original form on 27 Jul, 12:14
My values are the true ones though, which removes it from the category of hearsay to reliable fact.
Again, I must point out that the definition of hearsay is independent of whether the offer of evidence is reliable fact.
My book says so. <-- (hearsay)