He lashed out at the administration of President Barack Obama for “rushing” into a war based on questionable evidence.
The Syrian opposition accused the government of President Bashar al-Assad of launching a chemical attack on militant strongholds in the suburbs of Damascus last week, an allegation that many say has turned into a “casus belli” for US military intervention.
“This is being used as a pretext,” Kucinich said in an interview with The Hill. “The verdict is in before the facts have been gathered. What does that tell you?”
UN inspectors are in Syria to determine whether chemical weapons were used in the attack but have yet to release their report.
Kucinich, who voted against the Iraq war, also argued that airstrikes on Syria would turn the US military into “al-Qaeda's air force.”
“So what, we're about to become al-Qaeda's air force now?” Kucinich said. “This is a very, very serious matter that has broad implications internationally. And to try to minimize it by saying we're just going to have a 'targeted strike' - that's an act of war. It's not anything to be trifled with.”
On Tuesday, senior US officials said the Obama administration has plans to launch missile strikes against Syria “as early as Thursday.”
The US has beefed up its military presence in the eastern Mediterranean. Several nuclear-powered submarines are reportedly in the waters near Syria, also cruise-missile equipped.
US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has reiterated that the US military is ready attack Syria should President Obama give the green light.
According to Kucinich, Obama would be violating the Constitution if he does not get congressional approval before taking any military action against Syria. Congress is on summer recess until September 9.
Commenting on the alleged chemical attack, White House spokesman Jay Carney said Tuesday that "suggestions that there's any doubt about who's responsible for this are as preposterous as suggestions that the attack itself didn't occur."
Meanwhile, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Vladimir Titov said on Wednesday that the UN Security Council should wait for inspectors to present their report on the alleged gas attack.
"It would be premature, at the least, to discuss any Security Council reaction until the UN inspectors working in Syria present their report," Titov said.
Analysts say US claims about Syria are similar to the discredited intelligence on weapons of mass destruction that led to the US invasion of Iraq in 2003.
"'According to Kucinich, Obama would be violating the Constitution if he does not get congressional approval before taking any military action against Syria."
"According" to Kucinich" ?? LOL No, its "According to the Constitution" ......... dumbass journalist. He should quote Kucinich, but not write 'about' what he said as if Constitutional law is an 'opinion' to be differed with.
This action by the WH (War House) is also illegal under the War Powers Act. Under that act, the POTUS (Psychopathic Operative That Undermines Society) can only use the military without Congressional approval if there is an imminent threat to the security of the US. There isn't. So, the Commander in Chief, CiC (Criminal in Charge) is going to violate the oath he made and do it anyway. Note, the "proof" that will be offered comes from Israel. Hardly an impartial party and the same party that gave "proof" of WMD in Iraq. Later sources within the Israeli government came forth to state that Israel knew there were no WMD in Iraq.
Note also that John Kerry stated that there were WMD in Iraq:........ "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
And former Secretary Of State Colin Powell:
Granted, the Syrian government has chemical weapons. So does Israel along with biological and nuclear weapons too, Syria offered to get rid of theirs if Israel did the same. Israel refused to discuss the matter. BUT the question is did the Syrian government use them in this incident? They had no reason to do so since they have been winning and it could only offer a excuse for the US to intervene on behalf of the death squads the US has been supporting in the conflict. Another source that is cited as "proof" is coming from the al Nusra front. That is a branch of al Queda. So........the US media and the US government is is essentially using al Queda as a source of "proof"..........
Obama is doing the exact thing that he criticized GWB and Cheney for doing. What a hypocrit.
The whole dam bunch of the liberal progressive democrats are phonies.
Not a word from the lame liberal MSM on this either!