my care2
make a difference

community & fun

groups

get together & make a difference

 
 
This thread is archived. To reply to it you must re-activate it.
Boycott Freediver's Petition.... May 12, 2005 7:15 AM


73 new, 245 total Freediver F.
petition to allow hunting of feral animals Wednesday, 5:06 PM
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/510307417

I included a link to another group, but it didn't show up. So people are going to come here to discuss it.

Please sign.

Also some discussion here:

http://www.care2.com/c2c/groups/disc.html?gpp=705&pst=120387  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 12, 2005 7:17 AM

Hey Carolyn ! Thank you !!! I am with you on this !!!

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 12, 2005 7:19 AM

And me, I'm with you on this one too!!!  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
done May 12, 2005 7:32 AM

Thanks for the link...  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
right on freediver May 12, 2005 7:34 AM

Freediver's petition makes a lot of sense.  I believe I'm correct in saying that Australia is virtually overrun with kangaroos.  Yet another example of people creating an overpopulation problem in prey species by wiping out the predator species.  If the population is not kept in check, the entire species suffers from malnutrition, starvation and overcrowding.  If people choose to eat meat, I think it should come form naturally sustainable sources, not from commercial operations which are inhumane and environmentally destructive.  Here in Amerika, areas that are overpopulated by deer (not always a result of urban sprawl) will sometimes have a special weekend hunt and what meat there is on those undernourished creatures is donated to feed the hungry and impoverished.  All living things are the same in that they will all die sometime, the only difference is the quality of life experienced between birth and death (... or the inevitable motion from physical existence to the mysterious plane of the spiritual )
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 12, 2005 7:34 AM

Frineia I cant believe you signed this ! have you even read it before ???
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 12, 2005 7:51 AM

what's up with people's knee jerk reactions?  somebody who is against killing kangaroo's signed the petition advocating selling roo meat in California.     Does anybody read the facts about the issues anymore?  How are we going to make positive changes in the world if we don't take the time to thoughtfully and openmindedly learn about all the possibilities and options available to conscientious thinkers and do-er's?
I think Freediver's petition addresses two problems facing Australia...environmentally damaging commercial cattle operations and kangaroo overpopulation.  A fine example of identifying related problems and offering a viable solution.
Or on the other hand, maybe we should boycott wolves and coyotes because they eat those cute little bunny rabbits.

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
New Boycott group without this kinda crap FD May 12, 2005 8:57 AM

http://www.care2.com/c2c/group/CampaignBoycotts This group is for people who are actively involved in the various AR/AW boycotts. Environmental and human concerns are welcome as well. Discuss and debate are welcome as long as it is courteous.  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
??????? May 12, 2005 9:15 AM

What kind of crap are you referring to?  just curious because i don't see any here on this thread.
Also, i'm noticing the creation of many different boycott groups.  what's up with that?  sheeeeessh, if we can't all get focused together and speak with one voice we might as well just be spitting into the wind.
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
ooopsss May 12, 2005 9:15 AM

shame...  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 12, 2005 11:05 AM

I just got kicked off the "voice of the voiceless" group while discussing the problem of feral cats and kangaroo's, even though i didn't even come close to saying anything like they should all be killed.  i thought i was respectful and thoughtful but apparently some people don't like to be disagreed with.

what the f*&*k?
we can't discuss different sides of an issue?
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 12, 2005 11:08 AM

apparently there is a group of folks who are "flagging" freedivers profile.
that's pretty messed up.  are they gonna flag my profile too?  go ahead punks, make my day.

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Solrey... May 12, 2005 11:26 AM

I agree with you...

To me doens't make sence when someone shows a opinion and just because to someone else doesn't make sence this person is attacked..

I'll repeat what I have said some days ago... "I believe that we can agree or desagree about things which happens on our world. If anyone of this things just doesn´t make sence to you ...it's your rigth dicede boycott or not..."

But... to agree ou not... don't make anybody better or worst than other... Each one has different reasons, and I'm not undertanding why just we can't discuss our diferent oppions... Discuss is helth and we can get a common sense...

Well, if someone became offendend, sorry... It wasn´t my intention.

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 12, 2005 12:02 PM

i agree frineia.  the root of freedom is free expression.  sometimes the right solution is not the preferred one.  in order to resolve problems the best approach is to discuss all ideas and possibilities.  those who disagree with freedivers petition can choose to ignore it, flagging his profile over that just shows some people's intolerance towards other's points of view.  there are so many problems facing society today, problems that often have more than one workable solution, this often requires compromise and putting your own feelings on the shelf for a moment.  i can see the point that freediver is trying to make and i also see the point that those who disagree are trying to make.  unfortunately the one's who disagree didn't want to participate in a productive debate, that's sad...for if you close your mind to opposing points of view it just makes resolution all the more difficult.
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 12, 2005 4:27 PM

If you feel so strongly about it, sign the petition.

All boycotts should be open for discussion. There is already a boycotts group for people who are opposed to discussing boycotts. That is the reason why this group was started. Now there are two groups for people who are opposed to discussing boycotts. Perhaps they should try talking to each other....

Thanks for your input Sol. It is always disappointing when people respond like that. My father has a theory that once people have spent three generations off the land there is no hope for them because they loose all knowledge of nature. I thought it sounded a bit crazy because these things are so obvious, but I can see now he is right. So we end up with crazy situations like this with Californians eating feedlot beef and tortured baby cows but banning free range Kangaroo meat.

 [ send green star]
 
New to the group May 12, 2005 5:58 PM

Hi y'all,

I'm new to the group, but just from reading the posts, I have a feeling I'm on the unpopular side of the debate.  I'll throw in my 2 cents anyway. 

 It seems like people aren't really arguing about the petition, but the fact that Freediver, a member of Care2, has an opinion that varies from the traditional care2 view.  I hate to say it (bc my brother uses this line on me way too often) but it's the nature of things.  I don't believe in hunt-clubs, farms, or killing for an all-around chuckle, but I do believe that it's a whole lot better to shoot these roos and use them for nourishment rather than watch as they pretty much starve themselves to death.  I don't think they should call out open season, though, and it is scary to think that that could develop...which no doubt would be an even bigger problem.

Regardless of what you believe, I don't think it's too healthy to damn your opponent.  I was pretty surprised to look on Freediver's profile and see a couple of testimonies saying that he doesn't belong in Care2. 

If it sounds like I'm siding with Freediver, sorry dude, you're wrong.  I'm not going to sign the petition bc I don't know enough about it and it kind of scares me to think of what it could develop into. 

I am saying that if any kind of conservation movement is going to work, it's going to have to be approached by several different angles, Freediver's take is valid, I believe.

So that's that.  I can't say, though I'd eat any roo meat.  I know one animal is as valid as another, if you're going to eat one, be prepared to eat them all, but yowza.  I don't think I've ever even seen a roo...down here in the south we pretty much stay with the chickens, pigs, and seafood (which has been giving me strange dreams lately....)

Anyway, hi again   nice to meet y'all  

Ellen

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Options... or "Choices"... May 12, 2005 7:45 PM

-
When groups disriminate against individuals because they don't agree with the 'group'; it's still discrimination.

Choices. If intelligent minds and passionate hearts come together and research all possible solutions; the result is 'doing the best we can' at that space-and-time.

I call this... Humanity.

Be more.
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
UMMM May 12, 2005 8:09 PM

I have NO idea why he would call it hunting ferals, as it's not petition  for hunting ferals, it's for the importation and sale of kangaroo meat in California. The hunting of kangaroos for meat completely legal in Australia so *that* is not the issue.  That has been established in this discussion obviously.

So why the  misleadingly erroneous petition title and the decision to advertise it in an anti-hunting group?  I can only assume the author did so for the same reason he seems to do most things; to incite people and get attention.  Too bad  everything about this is so obnoxious or I would consider signing it, as I have no problem with the use of kangaroos for leather or meat, as it's far better for Australia's environment than cattle. 

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 12, 2005 9:20 PM

The petition site has switched around the petitions. I'm not sure what happened to the feral petition. When I posted the link it went to the ferals petition, not the kangaroo one. I am still waiting to here back from the petition site people.  [ send green star]
 
Freediver May 13, 2005 9:57 PM

Did you email the address given to you in the Feedback Forum? Or are you 'still waiting' for further response to the thread you started in the Feedback board?  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 13, 2005 10:30 PM

Yes I sent the email. I got a response asking for a confirmation and I sent that also by emailing to the address given, and I got an acknowledgement of that too. I thought perhaps they took action by changing it from the ferals petition to the kangaroo petition, but I expect they would have notified me if they did this? I'll send another email just in case.

Am I limited to one petition? I could just start another, but I'm worried they'll get switched around again after everyone has signed.

 [ send green star]
 
 May 14, 2005 5:37 AM

i had problems with a petition i created months ago.  it said the creator of the petition was the person who's computer i was using, although i put my name in and everything when i filled out the info for the petition.  there were a couple of other issues as well.  hopefully they'll get these problems fixed sometime.  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
anonymous  May 15, 2005 12:46 PM

I'm not sure why we should boycott feral cats or kangeroos for that matter. Why are persons signing a petition to ban petitions?  [report anonymous abuse]  [ accepted]
 
 May 15, 2005 12:49 PM

boycott clueless anonymous posts.  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Feral Animal Hunting... May 15, 2005 6:18 PM

My concerns about eating feral animals is the potential of diseases being past from the feral animal to humans.  Is this a logical concern?

 [ send green star]
 
 May 15, 2005 6:29 PM

Yes that is a concern with any animal, feral or native. I've heard that concern raised over possums. When you harvest Kangaroos, you have to check one of the internal organs for some kind of parasite or disease, but I forget the details. The closer an animal is related to humans, the more care you need to exercise with eating it. Which is why it is safe to eat fish raw, but not many mammals. Predators and scavengers (cats, pigs) are generally more risky than herbivors (cattle, roos). Kangaroo should not be eaten rare - cook it right through. I think that most of the really nasty diseases like flu and some of the venereal diseases came from animals that humans lived in close proximity with.  [ send green star]
 
My thoughts on harvesting May 15, 2005 7:26 PM

There are six billion humans on the planet, the planet can only regenerate to support one billion humans, some biologists say only 1/2 billon. 

Human families have to have only one child each for several generations to get us to the point where we arent on a suicide path with destiny.

But knowing that the religious fundamentalists, who are in control, are telling folks to procrate, this just isn't going to happen.

See where I am going with this ??
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
John May 15, 2005 7:35 PM

Well, we have had the flu of 1920's and at this point a couple of bird problems may spread to us again.  War also help with human population reduction.  Is that what you were saying JOHN?  [ send green star]
 
I dont know what I am saying here May 15, 2005 7:57 PM

I just read freedivers posts and the thought occured to me.


 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Carolyn May 15, 2005 7:59 PM

 Carolyn,Im behind you all the way and thank you! i dont know how anybody would be on "freediver's" side this is sick!  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Right on Kitcat! May 15, 2005 8:02 PM

I'm with Carolyn too!  I think Freediver's petitions are atrocious and I definitely am boycotting them!!   [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
I found a post by freediver... May 15, 2005 8:21 PM

that advocated higher fuel taxes (during a fuel crisis and endless recession) to fight globalism

(btw, I am a trucker and fuel goes up but rates stay the same for us)

where does he get this stuff ??
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 15, 2005 8:35 PM

John I think we could probably get by with the current population provided we reduce the per capita ecological footprint.

You appear to be arguing that the current population is unsustainable, but that nothing needs to be done to reduce the impact of burning fossil fuels. Is that correct? If you wish to discuss punitive taxes I have raised the issue in several other groups.

 [ send green star]
 
 May 15, 2005 8:49 PM

Wanna know what I really think ??  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 15, 2005 8:55 PM

If you can communicate it politely, go ahead.  [ send green star]
 
Higher fuel prices, lower consumption May 15, 2005 8:56 PM

I'm so sick and freakin' tired of all the whiners in Amerika crying about increased fuel costs, to them I say" Sit down and shut the hell up." We pay the LEAST for petro-fuels of any other country in the world, the only exceptions being a handful of major oil producing countries. I would be ecstatic if the cost of gasoline in Amerika increased three fold or more. Maybe then folks would start demanding reliable and efficient public transit across the nation. Amerika has only 5% of the worlds population yet uses 25% of the worlds petroleum and correspondingly produces 25% of the worlds carbon emissions. We also have 50% of the worlds obese population and 90% percent of the worlds crybabies. For the environmental damage that's already been caused Amerikans DO NOT DESERVE CHEAP GAS ANY LONGER. Especially when the average miles per gallon of new cars has gone DOWN over the past decade. Stop bitchin' about the price of gas and ride a goddamn bike Amerika.
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
About feral animals May 15, 2005 9:06 PM

Feral animals are a problem created by humans and those animals are not native to the areas they inhabit and can often be quite invasive. I think Freediver brings up an important issue in how do we best deal with a problem we created. Do we let feral animals run amok and hinder native species populations or do we do something, something to control the problem. If anybody else has any ideas please explain. It seems that so far the catch, neuter/spay, release thing isn't working very well. At least Freediver is trying to come up with a solution. If you don't like his ideas just ignore the petition and don't sign it, do you really have to go on a smear campaign against it? Most folks seem to be OK with eradicating certain human diseases, but seem to not realize that they're talking about eradicating an entire species of living organism in the process that are only guilty of making people sick.
peace,
solrey
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
our responsibilities to bio diversity May 15, 2005 9:49 PM

a brief read of article 21 in the convention on bio diversity, which was signed by both oz trail eea and amerika will give you an idea of what your individual, company and government responsibilities to the environment really are.

if you have the time to read this lengthy document, you will also realise that feral anything is noted as one of the major reasons for loss of bio diversity.

we all have a responsibility to remove feral species from our environment, but while we are discussing the pros and cons of how to achieve this target, feral species are increasing, and creating more and more damage to indigenous species worldwide.

it is approaching the era of ppl being accused of crimes against humanity by failing to control feral species rapidly and efficiently.

whats more important to you ? -- poor feral animal getting killed, or sustainable biodiversity for all mankind and nature?

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 15, 2005 9:53 PM

Boris could you please do me a favour and quote the relevant section on ferals, or direct me to it. I will have to repost the ferals petition and I would like to quote something from that convention.  [ send green star]
 
bio diversity convention May 15, 2005 10:04 PM

freediver, i went thru what seemed a total wall of ignorance in 1997 to even find this document, and eventually obtained the only copy the parliamentary library has, from my local mp. -- its fatter than the sydney phone book, and some parts of at are online.

there were mentions in it of ferals, and of the negative effect mainstream religions are having on bio diversity, both being canned severly, with good supporting cause and documentation.

now, as i had to return it yrs ago, i cant quote you pages etc -- i have looked on line for a total index for the document without avail -- i suggest you look in the index, under feral when you locate the document -- its worth a read anyway -- puts a lot of things into perspective.

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 15, 2005 10:06 PM

convention on bio diversity, global bio diversity assessment is its full title  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
On-line version May 16, 2005 5:51 AM

Here's a link to an online version of the Convention on Biological Diversity
http://www.biodiv.org/convention/articles.asp
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Sol May 16, 2005 6:55 AM

There are many states in America where it is practically impossible to build public transportation systems because the land is too spread out. I doubt it would work effeciently anyway. We are too dependant on our motor vehicles for transportation. And in some rural areas there is no public transprortion and the cost of even trying to build one would not be practical.

We don't pay as much for petrol fuels because we are not on the Metric system like Canada and the EU. I know you pay for petrol by the liter, and we pay by the gallon with a federal excise tax of 9/10 of a cent on each gallon. I have no idea how that tax came about or the author of the tax.

It is because of cities and rural areas where it is not practical or affordable to build public transportation.

Our rail systems are not as good as they are in the UE and other countries that depend on them. The distance from the East Coast to the West Coast is approximately 3000 miles apart. And the only railroad system we have is Amtrak. plus the fact that Americans drive larger motor vehicles, and sort of equals what you pay for petrol fuels. We use fossil fuels to heat our homes and many elderly people cannot afford the cost because Social Security does not pay that much to allow any of us to live a decent life style, and with the Bush adminstration cutting back on furture Social Security payments it will put recepients further in poverty and not get them out of poverty.

If Petrol fuel prices were to increase to $3.00 a gallon many people would not be able to afford those prices and would not be able to get to work. As I mentioned public transportation does not go to many cities where we are employed, and our employers don't want to pay for the work we do now, they will certainly not pay for an employee to come to work everyday.

Unfortunatley we have a corrupt incompetent president, and he needs to go before things get better in the states. His private war is costing us a fortune. It has cost over $300 billion so far, and is still rising. If Bush did not go to war the money he's spending could be used to rebuild the infrastructure of the U.S.. It is falling apart, and there is no end in sight to this unjust war in Iraq.

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Straight Vegetable Oil May 16, 2005 7:14 AM

Greetings,
Straight vegetable oil is a viable alternative. With a little investmant you can recycle old, yet well made, diesal cars to run on straight vegi oil. Don't believe me? Check these sites out!!

www.cleanegrease.com
www.journeytoforever.org/biodiesal_svo.html
www.veggieavenger.com
www.gobiodiesal.com
www.elsbett.com/engl/index.htm
www.greasecar.com

Unity In One Love, Matthew    [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 16, 2005 7:27 AM

$300 billion would buy plenty of public transportation infrastructure.  Does anybody seriously think that building a viable network of public transportation in Amerika is so much more difficult than it is in Europe or Japan?  It's the auto  and petroleum industries that have prevented public transportation from being built across the country, not the distances or terrain.  They built a transcontinental rail line across the entire country way back in the mid to late 1800's so there's no reason we can't build public transportation infrastructure in this modern age.  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
I'm so sick and freakin' tired... May 16, 2005 10:46 AM

Take a nap buddy !!!

I am not talking about gas, and gas was never mentioned.

We were refering to DIESEL fuel.

For trucks and buses.

Buses for saving fuel are obvious, but trucks are not.

Freight trains are worthless, the are simply too slow and would strangle the economy.
Trucks get 8 - 10 mpg but haul 40,000 lbs.
SUVs get about that and haul one lazy human.

Still you are looking a market economy solution to the environmental problem and that just ain't never going to happen.

Also.. truckers are not whiners, we are a lot of bad stuff but whining isnt it.

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 16, 2005 11:06 AM

Dude, it's not all about you.  You think you're the only person I've heard cry about the cost of fuel?...gasoline and diesel are both petro-fuels ya know.  And trucks are the most inefficient form of transporting freight there is.  One truck can haul 20 tons, one train can haul tens of thousands of tons.  But it's not only about trucks.  Increased fuel costs are always passed on to the consumer.  My father is a locksmith and he increased his trip charge due to the increase in gas prices.  I realize that the infrastructure for decent public transportation is inadequate at best so what that means is we need to build that infrastructure instead of wasting hundreds of billions of dollars on weapons of mass destruction and wasting more hundreds of billions using them to destroy people and land.  Folks in other countries pay as much for a litre of fuel as Amerikans pay for a whole gallon which is equal to 3.785 litres...do the math...that means that most other countries are paying nearly four times more than Amerikans for liquid petro fuels be it gasoline or diesel.
If we're going to save the environment from further damage and carnage we all need to make some sacrifices, including using less fossil fuels in all it's forms.
peace,
solrey
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Biodiesal & Straight Vegetable Oil May 16, 2005 11:11 AM

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
In a word.... May 16, 2005 11:59 AM

Free public transportation, of any kind, any kind of fuel, and unlimited bicycle paths and parking at trainstations.

Instant 80% savings...

And for those too remote to be serviced by tranist, cars which can be rebuilt N number of times, by a tree shade mechanic.

It is a little known fact that about as much fuel energy goes into making a vehicle as goes into the gas tank.  This is, of course, a greenhouse equation. 

Kids make better cars than Detroit, this I know for fact, and the paint, yee haw, FLAMES.  And then yeah fuel derived from waste, etc.

But at the end of the day its bicycles, cuz they are the best heart medicine available and heart disease is the biggest killer in America.

The image “<a href=http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:CkLQeKOVGkEJ:www.retropedalcars.com/ProductImages/images/w36/cars/hotrodcomet_lg.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors." />  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 16, 2005 4:33 PM

John I agree with you on the public transport issue.

Can you give a link to the figures on the energy required to manufacture a car?

 [ send green star]
 
global biodiversity assessment May 16, 2005 4:33 PM

the phonebook size document i was talking about has an extremely shortened web version here -- it doesnt have the index -- best to get your local polly to borrow it from the parliamentary library for you

http://www.dhushara.com/book/globio/ass.htm

its worth a look at the web version as well

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
from the global biodiversity assesment May 16, 2005 5:22 PM

The specific mechanisms by which the underlying causal factors result in the reduction and loss of populations, the extinction of species and the transformation and degradation of ecological communities include:

  • habitat loss, fragmentation and degradation (or the transformation of ecological communities to other uses),
  • over-exploitation;
  • the introduction of non native species;
  • pollution or toxification of the soil, water and atmosphere;
  • climate change.
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 17, 2005 1:12 AM

I have started a new group specifically for discussion of the problems associated with feral animals:
http://www.care2.com/c2c/group/feralperil

the ferals petition: 
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/319901459

Thanks you to all those who provided more information.

 [ send green star]
 
Boycott Freedivers petition May 17, 2005 7:00 AM

  I just read through all of the posts here and read a few things on biodiversity etc... Didnt something similar happen in Austraillia before with rabbits, hence the rabbit proof fence...I think it would be more humane to hunt them and use them for sustenance than to watch them starve...on the same hand here in America it seems this urban sprawl is just ruining our wildlife, its build,build,build and crowd out the animals and cut down more trees, and its all really unnecessary.   I thought of one other solution and that is instead of a killing hunt, have a round-up, find some conservation land and enclose them in, I think eventually they wouldn't thrive off of this land either  unless of course they were all neutered.  Sometimes things need culling, I agree. Maybe the hunt could be done humanely..so,this is where we talk about humane ways to kill...is it better to hit them dead on,one shot and have it done instnatly or maybe hit them with some form of euthansia and have them fall asleep?..or tag them and have them neutered?  No, theres still the overpopulation now.

I'm just throwing things out..perhaps to compromise.

  There is a natural order to things and humans are just as natural as roos.  The world has progressed this way right along...man killed,animals killed, everything went back to the earth in one way or another..the earth can not contain this many roos and have them survive and starvation is cruel....

I'm going to sign the petition..now what to do about the feral humans....sorry,kidding!

  Its also my opinion that americans need to stop manufacturing and purchasing such large vehicles...hello why does the average person need  these monsterous suvs and what have you?  I think perhaps smaller more efficent vehicles would help but,again at times it seems its always about more,more,more here. Yuck!  Annmarie

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
boycott a petition?? hunh May 17, 2005 7:10 AM

Ummm you cant boycott a petition you can only decide not to sign it.  Which as a freedom loving vegitarian I did.  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Sol May 17, 2005 7:15 AM

Maybe this article will help explain the reason public transportation isn't going anywhere in the US. It isn't the auto industry, it's our fedral government as you will see by this article. Bush is supporting vegetable oil as an altenative fuel for diesel burning vehicles. He might even fund a program to convert more diesel cars and trucks to run on used vegetable oil. This is not new. It has been being used for years.

Amendment to Highway Bill Targets Public Transit, Environment

An amendment to the federal transportation bill, SAFETEA, to be introduced today by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) will eradicate $11 billion from public transit funding, public health, community development, and environmental programs.

Prior to Sessions' proposal, the Senate had proposed a total of $295 billion for the overall bill. But the Bush Administration has insisted it will veto any bill that exceeds $284 billion.

Critics contend that the Sessions amendment targets funding for some of the most successful, badly needed programs for the sake of White House approval of the overall cost.

"This amendment is really about telling Senators they can get a $295 billion highway bill at the $284 billion price tag requested by the President," said Colin F. Peppard, Transportation Policy Coordinator for Friends of the Earth. "Unfortunately, the $11 billion difference comes at the expense of our most popular and effective transportation programs."

Rather than receiving the necessary funding from the federal government, Peppard asserts that the Sessions amendment "pushes the costs of these programs onto states as unfunded mandates that will leave our air dirty, our roads congested, and our transit stalled in its tracks." Among the programs being cut:

  • A $4 billion cut from Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) initiatives that are meant to reduce traffic and pollution while ensuring mobility, forcing ill-equipped local municipalities to cover the cost of Clean Air Act compliance.
  • A $5 billion cut from formula grants and research for public transit. These studies are geared toward enhancing security, planning, capital improvement, facility maintenance, and operating expenses.
  • A $1.1 billion cut from Surface Transportation Enhancement activities, one of the most popular programs. It funds historic preservation, community development, and water pollution mitigation.
  • A $100 million cut in transportation and community and system preservation programs (TCSP), which aim to improve synergy between transportation, community, and system development.
  • A $100 million cut to the Transportation and Finance Innovation Act, which provides federal credit assistance to major transportation investments of national importance.

###  [ send green star]  [ accepted]

 
 May 17, 2005 4:38 PM

Annmarie a big issue which people often forget is cost and the limited resources (often none) available for eradicating feral animals. There is also a limit to the amount of land set aside for conservation, and swamping it with feral animals would destroy it and defeat the purpose of having the land set aside. But maybe one day we'll come up with a better solution that works. Unfortunately the most successful method is biological control - ie disease. Which can go wrong. A lot of our feral animals were brought in as a biological control for other introduced pests.

 [ send green star]
 
Boycott Freedivers petition May 18, 2005 8:19 AM

Freediver,

 I understand this too, I know its tough to balance everything.  Clearly something has to be done before things get severly out of control and there is no means of helping the land or the kangaroos.  I was named after my mothers friend who moved to Australia and ran a Roo farm...I never tried to eat one and I dont believe I've ever seen one in person.  I signed the petition and hopefully the situation will become managable and harmonious again. If I had the room,I'd take some of them but, I doubt they would thrive in New England and there is that disease issue.  I'm a big animal lover and part of me thinks of thier cuteness and what they must be thinking  before they are killed(I know this is girlie and no one wants to hear this here, just my thoughts) but, seriously the land cant adequately support them and disease isnt going to help anyone or anything, it has to be got back under control. Perhaps the meat could go to Africa to help feed the hungry there, as a donation instead of to California..I think the really hungry will appreciate it more instead of making it a delicacy as oppossed to hamburg here in the states. 

That fuel issue keeps coming up....moderation and balance in everything folks...how about toning down the size of these cars..oh my goodness we could..just house the kangaroos in these suvs and still have room to spare!  Thanks Annmarie

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]

 
For Lowell B May 18, 2005 8:32 AM

No, I'm not trying to Boycott his petition nor,would I boycott anyones petition or anything else...I just put that in the subject box, congrats on your choice, I'm a freedom loving omnivore and made my choice too. Be careful with you insulin levels and fat intake,as a vegan you probably eat alot of complex carbs which eventually can lead to insulin resistance, have your doctor monitor your hdl and ldl, I know alot of vegetarians think thier diet is very healthy but,it can lead to alot of hidden problems...just wanted to let you know, I;ve gone back and forth with being a vegetarian myself, I've settled on eating a little of both vegetables and meats,just a balanced diet...I think my body in particular requires that kind of protein and fat, but thats just me,everyone is different. Annmarie  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 18, 2005 4:26 PM

I have cut back on my meat consumption too, but I doubt I could get by without it.

Thanks Lowell and Annmarie for signing. If you are a vegetarian please say so when you sign - I included a question so you can add comments. I want to get accross that this is not a vegetarian vs meat eaters issue, but an environmental issue. The more vegetarians I get signing it the better.

Also, the roo meat one is a different issue to the feral animals one.

 [ send green star]
 
 May 19, 2005 11:01 AM

why is it ok to eat cows and not kangaroos?! i'm vegetarian but cant understand.. is it cos ppl find kangaroos cute while cows look better on a plate?!  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 19, 2005 5:23 PM

Cows are much cuter than roos, IMO. It's just a cultural thing. We in Australia and America haven't let go of our European heritage. But it is changing slowly. It is banned in California because some ditzy senator's wife thought they were endagnered. Now it is the radical animal liberationists who are keeping the ban in place, as a back door way of trying to ban meat consumption. The same bill to get the ban lifted comes back every year or two, but they kick up enough of a stink to keep the ban in place.  [ send green star]
 
So many issues here... May 19, 2005 5:43 PM

Im gonna stick to the one Carolyn mentioned....

All you are feral shall we hunt you down & stick a bullet thru your head!!

Where are you from ? who brought you to your current land?

Roos in Oz are starving to death thru farming & irrigation, how many road kills can you count just on the west coast open you eyes dont you think that is enough punishment from humans...

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]

 
 May 19, 2005 5:46 PM

I am not a feral. Humans are native to Australia. One of the other group members is about to do a roadkill count. If we didn't shoot them, there would be a lot more roadkill.  [ send green star]
 
 May 19, 2005 5:50 PM

 Im not aware of you on care2 freediver but with those comments I guess I understand now why people are feeling your like not really in tune!!  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 19, 2005 5:53 PM

Well, I am a not a vegetarian - over here they breed ostriches and - sorry, it is delicious! They also sell kangaroo meat...I can agree on that if they breed them like cows or pigs or whatever...Well, that is my opinion on that. Just hunting them down to reduce the number is crazy I agree on that....

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]

 
 May 19, 2005 5:53 PM

If you want to understand the situation with feral animals, please check out my group on ferals. With Kangaroos, it's an environmental issue. They are removing the choice that Californian's should have to select the most ethical meat to consume.  [ send green star]
 
Dang Freediver May 19, 2005 5:56 PM

Your sure know howTo fire them up. I get a kick out of reading how everyone gets off on tangents and the subject changes and people start seeming to hate each other and judging each other.

So many people have such big hearts when it comes to the critters. And so many people that are so far beyond the life of the 'one'.

Always, a good read. Mostly I read when they start out attacking you. Sorry, they just seem to be the most fun. Just thought I otta say hi.

I'm driving my SUV (steam engine to be sure) to the forest tonight to count spotted owls and having a raccoon burger (road kill, I swear). LOL

Thanks Free!

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 19, 2005 6:00 PM

I do I worked in the outback, the roo was there buddy long before you! Eco systems needs balance,nature brings this not a gun or poison & certainly not you!!!  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 19, 2005 6:02 PM

Perhaps it's time I brought out the code of conduct. Remember I want this group to be a supportive atmosphere. I don't want to have to start deleting posts again.

http://www.care2.com/c2c/groups/disc_conduct.html

All members of our site must agree to and abide by the following Code of Conduct for our boards:


Respect and courtesy - All Care2 Members are entitled to express their views and beliefs in a safe environment without feeling attacked. Members may not infringe on the rights of any other person to express themselves in a safe environment. This policy includes:


Any harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or otherwise objectionable posts.


Any posts which are invasive of another's privacy.
Name calling or otherwise attacking the person posting rather than the content of the post. Disagreement is encouraged, but you should only comment on the argument or position taken, never against the person posting their opinion or belief.


Any racial or ethnic slurs or insults relating to the mental, physical or intellectual qualities of any member.

 [ send green star]
 
 May 19, 2005 6:03 PM

Ecomamma do you know why I am promoting roo meat?  [ send green star]
 
 May 19, 2005 6:17 PM

The kangaroo harvest happens in a different part of the country to where most of the bushfires were. I don't think Adidas is the driving force behind it. They are harvested for their meat. The assurances of our government are not weak. The chances of seeing roos are very strong. There are more kangaroos here than when Europeans first arrived. They are everywhere. The harvest is sustainable. The hunters usually take less than what they are licenced to take. You appear to agree that the industry would be at risk.

Fact: Californians eat tortured baby cows and feedlot beef. Yet for some strange reason they think free range meat is cruel.

 [ send green star]
 
I have no idea~to keep the numbers down maybe? May 19, 2005 6:21 PM

was the warning for me?

I would simply conduct myself how I would as if we were discussing this in person,you opinion is vaild to you,  I am expressing it is not to me, that is acceptable isnt it? Altho I can see your thought process to come to your beliefs. I respect that we are different in our outlooks. I am totally used to discussing issues with the most diverse of views. people who feel they have the right to take lives kinda bug me...if its to eat themselves then thats substaining you & yours but mindless killing for factory or farming,sport,import/export of animals or environmental reasons to me seems very negative & that the person isnt seeing the bigger picture. I was simply saying I feel you or whoever kills this way is not helping matters it was not ment to be a personal attack.

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 19, 2005 6:23 PM

If you read the petition on roo meat, it gives a basic introduction to why I am promoting it.  [ send green star]
 
The facts May 19, 2005 6:27 PM

Thank you Eleanor, I shall sign right away  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 19, 2005 6:33 PM

Please do not copy and paste large amounts of text into this group. I will delete the two large posts soon. Please provide links to where you got that from.  [ send green star]
 
 May 19, 2005 6:34 PM

make that three  [ send green star]
 
 May 19, 2005 6:52 PM

If anyone else would like to post the links before I delete the spam please do so, otherwise the information will be lost. Just do a google search for it.  [ send green star]
 
 May 19, 2005 6:53 PM

Eleanor check your introductions.  [ send green star]
 
Ive read it May 19, 2005 7:05 PM

and like I said we are intitled to our opinions...but swopping one death for another I dont understand! They are native, why not ban cow & sheep farming? surely that makes more sense?

It's sad that you threaten to delete posts several times..first mine then Elenors. This is a place to speak freely & share information or so I thought! Please think before you do this as many people can gain insight into the otherside of the discussion, thats what we aim to do on care2.

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 19, 2005 7:08 PM

If you violate the care2 code of conduct, I should delete your post. If you spam this thread by copying in large amounts of text, I will delete that also.

Banning cow meat would make more sense than banning kangaroo meat.

 [ send green star]
 
 May 19, 2005 7:20 PM

To continue discussing the kangaroo roo meat petition go here:

http://www.care2.com/c2c/groups/disc.html?gpp=1141&pst=14926

To continue discussing the feral animals petition, please go here:

http://www.care2.com/c2c/groups/disc.html?gpp=4244&pst=126072

 [ send green star]
 
 May 20, 2005 12:22 AM

"Please think before you do this as many people can gain insight into the otherside of the discussion, thats what we aim to do on care2."

Ecomamma I encouraged her to post links to the information instead of copying it all in here, which is unreasonable. I want the information to be available to those who are interested just as much as you do.

 [ send green star]
 
 May 22, 2005 7:14 AM

 Good topic and brings up many points some people are afraid or embarrased to post on a green site. I my self hate factory farms, eat free range or organic meats, support small farms and yes hunt. I am not a sport hunter (killing for fun? thats sick). I hunt because it's part of the cycle, I also donate meat. believe me there are plenty of hungry people and food shelves who are glad to take a deer. Nature is out of balance, and yes culling a herd saves habitat and other species.  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Freedriver I'm sorry but this is just Gross :(( May 22, 2005 6:14 PM

"Animals are my friends and I don't eat my friends."

-- George Bernard Shaw

The Meatrix

http://www.themeatrix.com

Store Wars

http://www.storewars.org/flash/index.html

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 22, 2005 6:41 PM

The sentiment in both of those clips appears to favour roo meat over cow meat.  [ send green star]
 
 May 24, 2005 3:05 PM

i luv this thread! glad to see that Christy P. has expressed my thoughts and feelings about this thread already!

i'm vegetarian but i make it a point to buy free range animal products for family and friends who r not vegetarian in the hope that they'd switch to these rather than consuming and encouraging cruel farming.. i wont eat meat.. while some ppl just cant live without having meat at least once a day. for these ppl, i'd like them to eat meat that did not come from a cow that have never strolled around to graze or a chicken that has never seen daylight!

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
:( My Opinion: May 25, 2005 3:47 AM

      I do not believe in killing, ANYTHING...We are above this.

 

         Besides, it is unnatural for us to consume meat to begin with. Our digestive track is akin to a GORILLA 

      We are not wolves, or lions...Look at yourself in the mirror! You are a frail looking ape, and Apes are vegetarian by NATURE. They are Gentle creatures. We should all be Vegetarian by strong example.

        Our digestive track is very long, so is the ape's, and identical to ours.. It is not short, or as acidic, as the meat eating mammals. That is why so many have bowel cancer now. And other horrors. Society is very sick, and it is because of meat consumption, and the consumption of other unnatural products. This sickness is also destroying nature, as we consume our environment.

   This entire petition should not be an issue. YOU SHOULD NOT BE EATING MEAT TO BEGIN WITH.

    As far as feral animals... I take care of a feral cat, and we are both working towards his domestication. Other people, who have done this have had success. I really would not want some idiot shooting my feral cat, he has a name. BACH. Feral cats are just homeless cats. Friends in need.

Well, that is all I have to say,

Cora  

       

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Oh yes, one more thing... May 25, 2005 4:05 AM

You want to shoot animals because of an overpopulation problem. A problem that wouldn't be a problem if WE  didn't screw up the eco-system by plowing through the land for farming....

Well, Humans have overpopulated the earth... And are offsetting the balance.

Perhaps you are shooting at the wrong culprit?

Cora

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Oh Cr_p I can't stop...! May 25, 2005 4:12 AM

One more thing...(I Think)

       There are humans starving on the planet, would it be "Merciful" to just shoot them? Or do you believe there could be a more humane solution?

Let me know what you think.

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
And Do not go suggesting roo meat... May 25, 2005 4:15 AM

Or any other meat.

As I said, It is unhealthy, and creating problems.

Done now

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
so, May 25, 2005 5:56 AM

are we still boycotting Freediver's boycott?

Hi all!

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
which makes me want to think May 25, 2005 5:59 AM

in thailand, it is customary for people to eat puppies and make them into all kinds of dish - soup, stew, etc.

yes, you heard me - Puppies!!!

now. If this petition gets approved, what are the chances that people who want this kind of meat to be allowed in California? If Freediver gets his way in making Roo meat available in CA, then the chances of Thai people in America wanting no restriction on sale and cooking of puppy meat will increase also.

NO ROO MEAT!!!

NO ROO MEAT!!!

NO ROO MEAT!!!

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Lady May 25, 2005 5:09 PM

The feral animals issue isn't an overpopulation issue. It is a biodiversity issue. It's about extinction. The UN has identified introduced species as being just as important as habitat loss (screwing up the land) in causing loss of biodiversity in many places. Eating wild kangaroo would help us cut back on cattle farming.

Meat is a natural part of our diet, just not as much as most westerners eat.

Eating puppies is fine - it's just where they come from that would bother most Americans and cause a lot of problems. Although PETA has apparently started killing unwanted pets too like most shelters. There's another potential food source being wasted.

 [ send green star]
 
I can not stress this enough.... May 25, 2005 5:55 PM

    Meat is not a natural part of our diet we are apes. I know we would all like to believe otherwise, that we are "so much more," but that is what we are. (I take it as a compliment.) Our digestive tracts are the same as Apes, and they are gentle vegetarians. Not meat eaters. It is unnatural for them to eat meat, as it is for us to eat meat.

    Please, look at any, "Natural," carnivore, they will have a very different digestive track than us apes. More acidic, and shorter intestines, and so fourth. There is a major difference if you do your research...

NO ROO MEAT!

NO ROO MEAT!

NO ROO MEAT!

Cora

One more thing...

      The roo problem is mans problem. I believe we created it. Like all the other problems on this planet it would not exist if it weren't for us dysfunctional apes The imbalance is ours, not theirs. The roos should not be shot because we messed up. It is unfair. Would you like to be sentenced to death for somebody elses mistake? It would not make sense.

      *I beleive if people really put their minds to it they could curb this through mass sterilization...Not just some half fast effort, but a real labor of love. It would be an ungoing battle, not something that can be fixed overnight, but wouldn't it be rewarding?

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 25, 2005 6:03 PM

Yes, meat is a natural part of our diet. We are omnivours. Our teeth and digestive tract are slightly different because we have been cooking our food for so long.

There is no roo problem. We have a cow problem.

No that wouldn't be rewarding.

 [ send green star]
 
lady c -- May 25, 2005 6:04 PM

seeing you are so informed about the meat eating habits and needs of various mammals, can you inform the post what the is the enzyme that is only found in red meat that is necessary for complete human digestion?

and i have always wanted to know why gorillas sometimes kill and eat other primates?

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 26, 2005 6:39 AM

Horseradish!

    Borish, there is a natural alternative to the enzyme you are speaking of, otherwise there would not be many, MANY, healthy vegans/vegetarians/raw foodist out there. They are not taking any meat enzymes....I surely dont' , and all of my bloodtest are more than healthy. Explain that?!

          As far as our teeth being slight different, Freediver, you mean that puny little pointed incisor of ours? Have you taken a look at Gorillas teeth? Ohmy, they have quite the incisor two...great for tearing into fruit....that is primarily what they eat.

Now back to Borish, Gorillas occasionally kill and eat each other. IT is rare, but yes it happens...Some humans have been known to do this as well, does that mean we should all practice this? Cannibalism?

No. I should hope not...

Cora!

NO ROO MEAT! NO ROO MEAT! NO ROO MEAT!

(or cannibalism...)

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]

 
One more thing... May 26, 2005 6:47 AM

Boris,

 If we needed that enzyme as badly as you have concluded," in order to digest our food," wouldn't vegetarians/vegans/raw foodist be starving of malnutrition by now? I think so...

    My Aunt has been a vegetarian her entire life, and she could probably run circles around any carnivore within miles...

(Excuse typos-just woke up, sipping my tea)

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]

 
horse radish? May 26, 2005 6:49 AM

well, love the stuff, but in all reality, it is one of those vegetables that has almost been made extinct by monsanto and friends -- i havent been able to locate any here for 5-6 yrs [seed, nor fresh root]-- hope the vegetarians dont need mega doses of it lol

so i was correct -- you actually know something about this stuff -- whats the enzime and where do you get it, for the interests of the participants in this thread --

btw -- i had to clean up the remains of an endangered squirrel glider today -- the remains are in the freezer, and will go to the museum --who said brushtail possums were leaf eaters?

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
roos May 26, 2005 7:03 AM

and as far as roos are concerned, they are a bio diversity issue, not an animal liberationist issue, nor a meat issue.

if humans want to consume the waste they propagate,[roo culling etc] that is their concern, and may actually be good for the environment.

i am about to do a research trip to the opal fields in northern nsw, to assess the population of a recently identified orchid species endemic to a 2 sq mile area in the mining fields.

this population had recovered since stock [sheep and cattle] were removed from the leases, and is now being eaten by kangaroos.

the species is known -- pterostylis, greenhood orchid, but the variety is reduced to a population of less than 100 known plants at the last count.

reports from the fields indicate roo damage is extrene to native vegetation.

i will post my report when i return middle next month.

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Part 1...On meat eaters... May 26, 2005 7:11 AM

Physiology of Plant-Eaters vs. Meat Eaters
 
Definition of a Meat Eater:
          -Has Claws
         -No pores on skin:perspires through tongue to cool body
        -Sharp pointed front teeth to tear flesh.
       -No back molar teeth to grind food..
       -Small salivary glands in the mouth.
       (Not needed to pre-digest grains and fruits.)
     -Acid Saliva
     No enzyme ptyalin to pre-digest grains 
     Strong Hydrocloric acid in stomach to digest tough animal muscle, bone, etc...
 Intestinal tract only 3 times body length, so rapidly decaying meat can pass out of body quickly....
In response:To Boris.
       Busily typing away, will answer you briefly, does it matter if I am aware of your particular enzyme? It is not needed obviously or humans would not be able to sustain themselves on vegetarian diets. That was the point I made earlier...Other Plant eating animals do not have this enzyme...since you need meat in order to have it... to aid in "Complete" digestion... Should we start encouraging rabbits to eat steak?
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 26, 2005 7:16 AM

"if humans want to consume the waste they propagate,[roo culling etc] that is their concern, and may actually be good for the environment."   BORIS

   You are refering to animals that are still living, and breathing that haven't yet been slaughtered...You are addressing other souls, as mere waste...That is sad.

    case closed.

          

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
rabbit scat May 26, 2005 7:23 AM

i will not post the data i have on analisis of wild rabbit scat in the interests of decency, but i assure you, if you find rabbit scat in the wild, and send it off for analisis, like i do, you might be amazed at the dietary extremes of your fluffy pet when it becomes feral.

 and no, i am referring in the animals that are dead, and left to rot in the bush, or utilised to stop the utilisation of some chemical constructed alternative.

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Part 2. May 26, 2005 7:25 AM

(As far as roos go, I beleive since we created the imbalance, we should do them one justice and sterilize them...not just erradicate them, or have an organized mass killing. It is not their fault they have become an enviromental hazard.)

PLANT EATERS

-perspires through millions of pores on skin

-no sharp, pointed front teeth

-has flat, back molar teeth to grind food

-well-developed salivary glands, needed to pre-digest grains and fruits

-alkaline saliva; much ptyalin to pre-digest grains

-stomach acid 20 times weaker than that of meat-eaters

-intestinal tract several times body length (plant foods decay slowly so can take their time to pass through the body

NOW TYPING PART 3, HUMAN BEINGS.

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Feral rabbits are not a problem in CANADA May 26, 2005 7:31 AM

HARES ARE INDIGENOUS TO THIS COUNTRY.

    And I am aware of scat problems. But, are you really into eating excrement..? In the united states there are only a few cases of round worm cases/from raccoons a year...and it is mainly acquired by actual consumption... and most victims are young babies, who should've been supervised, and imbeciles.

Now what parasiticl infection are you refering to regarding rabbits?

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 26, 2005 7:34 AM

Wait a minute...I couldn't believe it. Are you saying rabbits actually eat other animals, and so fourth when faced with starvation? Incredible.

Well, we have done similiar things....recall those stranded plane crash victims, who ate each other. So Gross.

I am sure anyone who is starving will stoop to lows.

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 26, 2005 7:38 AM

very little parasite scans in the scats i have sent off, [ i have a six inch parasitic round worm from a wild rabbit i photographed this week,  -- never seen it before -- and i have the specimen in bhp waiting to be picked up by the csiro.] but heaps of bushrats, antichinus, frogs, and arthropods -- and btw, hares are a different species, with far different habits -- we were typing about rabbits in the wild -- at least i was -- like i said this is a bio diversity issue, not a humanoid one  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Part 3 May 26, 2005 7:42 AM

HUMAN BEINGS:

-No claws

-perspires through millions of pores on the skin

-no sharp pointed front teeth

-has flat, back molar teeth to grind food.

-well developed salivary glands, needed to predigest grains and fruit

-alkaline saliva, much ptyalin to pre-digest grains

-Stomach acid 20 times weaker...than that of natural meat eaters

-Intestinal track several times body weight...

(Still thinking about carnivorous bunny rabbits, what a horror. Poor things. I could not believe waht I was reading.Is there any other data on this other than what you have documented? And, were the rabbits affirmed?)

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
lady -- May 26, 2005 7:43 AM

sorry but its 12.42 am here -- i will continue typing at you in the later morn lol -- like after i have done stag watch for the sea eagles before dawn  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
We should get in yahoo, the way we're going back and fourth.... May 26, 2005 7:47 AM

    No, domestic breeds of feral rabbits are not a problem in Canada. At least not as long as we have a healthy coyote population. Although... I did see a little black and white dutch bunny in the woods once, it was quite unexpected. (I love rabbits.) I tried to catch him, but you know how that went. LOL.

Not too many people can outrun a rabbit.

       

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]

 
 May 26, 2005 7:48 AM

See you later, it was fun  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 26, 2005 5:10 PM

Lady, I'm not sure where you get your definitions from, but a meat eater is an animal that eats meat. I can think of plenty of carnivors and omnivours that fail your definition of a meat eater.

Humans can only live on a vegetarian diet in a few rare natural settings. I am not familiar with any group of humans living in a natural setting that are vegetarian.

 [ send green star]
 
 May 27, 2005 8:51 AM

Hi there everyone. With due respect to everyone here, I'd just like to say something.

Freediver, I understand your reasons, completely. I am a vegan for the reason that I disagree with large scale agribusiness that pollute the environment and also against factory farming of animals, not because it is cruel to eat animals. TRibes that sustain themselves through hunting of animals do less damage to the environment than a vegan does when eating chemical rich products (not to mention soya products). To protect biodiversityand thus the environment sometimes it is neccessary to control a populatin of species, particularly invader species. This doesnt make me an evil person or does not mean to say that I advocate the manipulation and ill treatment of animals. A dream would for all humans to sustain themselvreswhile protecting the environment.

To others against Freediver, I think you should begin to show a little more respect: "Respect those that you are against, for your qualities will be known amongst your enemies"

Inorder to make changes and make a postive difference I believe we must respect and try to understand those we fight against after all aggression doesnt get you anywhere.

I hope no one takes offence here, for that is not my intention. With respect to you all!

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 28, 2005 8:03 AM

***I was not showing any disrespect...As suggested. I was just putting my opinion on the table.

     But, I will say this, I can argue this issue for all eternity and will never agree with freediver, or "Freediver Followers" hehehe, has a certain ring to it, doesn't it? Freediver Followers..

(No insult ,Free...it just sounded catchy.)

    Well, I do wish you the best, but most of all I wish you compassion, and love for all living things... And a heart that can embrace every life as meaningful.

        And I will leave my main request at your feet...

IT IS UNFAIR TO DESTROY THOSE ANIMALS, THEY ARE LIVING BEINGS....MASS STERILIZATION, NOT A HALF FAST EFFORT, WOULD ERRADICATE THIS PROBLEM IN A VERY HUMANE, AND REWARDING WAY.

Love & Light,

  Cora

I WASH MY HANDS OF THIS THREAD...

   

                 

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Respect, communication, understanding and balance..... May 28, 2005 1:15 PM

Being an extreme animal rights activist will not benefit the future for the earth and her inhabitants.....

Freediver, I agree with you although I am an animal rights activist. Understanding the views of others and gathering information from all sides is the way forward and the way to educate others. Realising the reality and taking practical and realistic action is what must be done to solve the relentless problems that arise. Being too one sided will get things nowhere.

I say one last thing......learn from Freediver instead of being too set in your own views and ways. Freediver cares just as much as we all do in care2 and I am sure we can learn alot from him......open your eyes and see the wider picture.

With much respect and peace,

Dana

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 28, 2005 3:50 PM

Thanks Dana.

Lady I agree that it is unfair, but that shouldn't stop us doing what is right. We can't even afford a half arsed effort so sterilisation programs are not an option. More animals are likely to escape that way, plus you are still releasing feral animals into the wild for no good reason.

 [ send green star]
 
 May 28, 2005 5:20 PM

      As I said, I was being respectful.

       But your idea of respect is agreeing. (So step down off your high horse "whoever you are" who just jumped in- Because I do not need to be lectured, or told I am being "disrespectful" and so fourth, when I was only discussing my opposing veiws. ***If you want disrespect, write me with that condenscending attitude and I will give you a full blown demonstration in private.)

  Now, stop addressing me, because it is redundant, and this will only go on indefinately...Can we agree to disagree? I will never follow program. AS I said, I wash my hands of this thread... I am done here. Convince somebody else.

Sincerely,

Cora

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]

 
 May 28, 2005 5:26 PM

And Freediver, in closing....

     I know you mean well but this is pointless, so I am agreeing to disagree. I wish you the best, but I just hope a less violent approach can be taken, than the slaughter of thousands. Those are living beings you are discussing. They are just as worthy of life as anything else....my opinion. 

Cora

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 28, 2005 6:18 PM

I am still discussing this with you because I don't believe you have understood my argument. Usually if you want to agree to disagree you paraphrase the other person's argument. If someone understands what you say but still disagrees there isn't much you can do about it. But if they don't do this it seems more like they are simply refusing to understand.  [ send green star]
 
 May 28, 2005 7:41 PM

Freediver,

      You want to justify killing, and I cannot agree with this. It is against my nature. I look at every living thing individually, as I would you, or anyone, or any other living thing. I am sorry if my vision seems narrow to you in that sense. I cannot help it. It is the way I am wired. I just believe in my heart that there is always a solution other than destruction. I pray you find a way, besides what you are proposing.

    If I were to side with you, and what you are saying...Than I would  have to be just, and fair, and say we should slaughter humans. For we are also overpopulated, and we are also harming the enviroment....And we are also a hazard to the ecosystem...Can you see it through my simple reasoning?

     If I seem disrespectful for not agreeing, it is only because I feel life is being disrespected. I am passionate about this. If that makes me a fanatical activist, than so be it. I am guilty as charged.

      Freediver, you have handled our disagreement with eloquence, and dignity, but I still cannot agree. I may never agree. How long do you wish to continue?

     Sincerely,

     Cora Lynn

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
P.S May 28, 2005 7:49 PM

excuse typos, it is my bedtime  [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Oh yes, one more thing... May 28, 2005 8:02 PM

(So you know I know what you are talking about...)

     I do not beleive in killing roos, moos, or anything else.

For whatever reason.

That is the bottom line. And this was all I was trying to say.  

   

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 28, 2005 10:09 PM

Lady, I did not suggest that you need to agree with me, merely that you should paraphrase my basic argument so that I know you understand it. You appear to concede the possiblity that I am right within a certain set of values, but that doesn't mean you understand what I wrote in the way I intended.

Yes humans do cause more damage than feral animals, and from certain perspectives it would be fairer to kill them. But fairness isn't really a part of this. I am talking about what works. Killing people would lead to greater environmental harm. Killing feral animals improves the environment, in terms of biodiversity.

In your last post, you repeated your argument, not mine. That does not convince me that you understand me. That could be an internally consistent counterargument to what I am saying, but what I have been saying should be sufficient to make your philosophy seem insufficient. That being said, I would be prepared to let this rest if I thought you understood me.

 [ send green star]
 
I understand this. May 29, 2005 3:24 AM

A close view of a red kangaroo. by Medford Taylor/National Geographic
     I did not sleep well, and had a strange revelation...It doesn't matter. No matter what I say, it will not make a difference. So, go ahead, kill the kangaroo for whatever reasons, then protest dog consumption in China...or join your friends who would make a stink over the death of a kitten, yet, eat several cows a year....
     What deems one life sacred, and the other not?
Anyway, part of this revelatin has led me to say Goodbye,
       I am leaving Care 2.
Cora
 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
P.S. May 29, 2005 4:06 AM

       You think that by killing the kangaroo for meat, and importing it to California, that it is going to fix your problem with farmland/Bovine...It isn't you know. Roo meat will be just as popular as ostrich... It will never fly. And should it, it will eventually be raised on farms, when you wiped them out of their natural habitat, and you will be faced with the same problems again with new names.

Now I have to go write my Goodbye letters.  

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Cora, May 29, 2005 4:54 AM

281 green stars

180 butterflies

You are someone who does make a difference. THere will always be those we can not sway or change. There will always be those we can. I am sure I am not the only one who has been silently watching this thread. Silent, not because I do not have an oppinion, but because I am torn.

     I do not believe that our bodies are designed for vegetarianism. Even gorillas eat insects. I do not believe that our bodies are designed to eat large quantities of meat either though (anyone who thinks we are is ignorant of medical facts). I believe that humans have done the entire planet and all its citizens, plant, animal, and mineral disservice by not following the naturla laws of the world. I also believe that due to the worlds off balance state there are times when population control of some species must be performed to help preserve other species. (And yes I think this applies to humans as well.

      I have two beautiful sons, and would dearly love more children - but I know that if every adult limited themselves to two children our population would shrink. I can't change what others do, but I can make sustainable choices for myself. (This is very hard for my wife to understand as she wants more children too.)

     Cora you have made some great arguments and have swayed my oppinions several times. If you want to leave this thread because there is no more to say, do so. I would be saddened to see you leave this community though . We would be poorer for your absence. Perhaps you will still leave. Perhaps you already have. Regardless I honor you and your warrior spirit.

Namaste

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
Matt May 29, 2005 5:05 AM

That is very true....the human race has lost the laws of nature. In society today we have huge extensive cattle farming, factory farmed animals and there is a great division bewtwwen places - those that eat a HUGE amount of food andthose that have nothing whatsoever. There are people who are trying to sustain their living through growing their own vegetables etc and hunting for their family....that is the old ways and these old ways had a balance with the cycles of nature. It saddens me that their is the gruesome sites of factory farming. It will take a lot to change the whole society of the earth. But each and every one of us can help make a difference by doing even the smallest of things.

With peace,

Dana

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 29, 2005 4:08 PM

Lady there is no need for you to leave care2. This site needs more people like you who can disagree with someone but still show them respect. There are plenty of other boycott groups for people who share your values. You don't need to make all of care2 just like you for it to be a good place.  [ send green star]
 
Respect you say.... May 30, 2005 11:24 AM

    How about I show you the same respect you intend to show the Kangaroos

     Thiis "Respect" issue is so tired... So passe.... I have to agree with you, right? That is your definition of respect? Or compromise my own set of values? Moral, or ethical?

Have you looked up the meaning of the word Respect in the dictionary?

One definition:

    Respect: 1.Consider deserving of high regard.

                 2. Relation to something.

    As for the latter, I cannot relate to you. 

     

    Now as far as my leaving care 2 I have decided against it. There are people here who have written me and shown support. People who have boycotted your group....(Something I should've done in the first place for it would have spared me a lot of heartache.)

  Anyway, you  are right, You do not represent the face of care 2. 

 The ANIMALS do, (Nature) and the people who love them. 

     So, I am going to stay with Care 2, and leave this group...But in the process I am going to leave you a link to a lovely story.It was featured in USA today...(They will probably change it soon, so you really should check it out.)

It is about a Kangaroo who saved a man's life.

 http://www.usatoday.com/news/offbeat/2004-04-28-kangaroo_x.htm   

P.S.

   I would like to see this Roo and You in hand to hand combat...No guns, no knives, and no witnesses. Why not Make it fair? 

 He would kick........................

  Kangaroo

AND ONE LAST,

NO ROO MEAT!

NO ROO MEAT!

NO ROO MEAT!

 

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]

 
 May 30, 2005 11:44 AM

   For those who don't know...

A member of the macropod family, the Red Kangaroo is the largest living marsupial.  Males can be as tall as two metres and weigh up to 198 pounds

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
 May 30, 2005 11:48 AM

Signing out of your group now...

        

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
  New Topic              Back To Topics Read Code of Conduct

 

This group:
$ Boycotts $
620 Members

View All Topics
New Topic

Track Topic
Mail Preferences


Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved