anonymous why would you want us to sign a petition to ban a person from Care2? What has that person done? Why are you out to get him especially by joining groups and asking ppl anonymosusly?
poo, already had signed em all...but i guess that's a good thing! WAIT, correction-signed all BUT the one posted by anon. Fishy? Yes, i think so. There are only 5 signature on the petition with comments such as 'he's just a pain in the butt, he's a jerk'etc. Anon, we need more than that. Who hasn't run across rude or offensive members? I have. They usually just want to ruffle your feathers and see who they can pull into their little micro-drama. You can engage them or simply move on to people and issues that really matter. Sorry guy, but you need to pull off the mask and give concrete reasoning behind your plea for our signatures. peace all
[send green star]
[
accepted]
I wasn't the anonymous one, and I won't sign that petition because I am not sure that I agree with banning Robert P. from Care2... but I can tell you about my experience of Robert P. - he has posted things on the Amnesty International (human rights) group that... hmmm... I shan't gossip. I will just tell you that I agree with those who want to get him out of the Amnesty International group. If you are interested in the truth of the matter, you can check it out for yourself
I started this one myself. Please disregard the petition "deadline". We will continue it until we have 100,000 signatures
And please spread the word about this petition - please let all your family and friends know about it? maybe post it on other groups? - let's save our rainforests!
By the way, if you are interested in learning and talking more about any and all aspects of how to make Latin America and better place for all living creatures there, you might like to consider joining our new group:
Only kidding, but there sure must be quiet a few that dont like him for you all to try to get him kicked out. And dont blame anyone for posting this anonymously cause they dont want to be harrassed by him. I never came across him, but dont blame you all.
Thanks for explaining it Simon. And to you too.
I just signed your rainforest petition and gonna come join yours and Paola`s Latin American group.
Dogs are poisoned, beaten to death, strangled in the street just in front of our eyes, in the eyes of our children - by the City Hall employees. Inhabitants of the town are shocked to discover that the dogs allready being castrated and keept around the blocks of flats are kiled on the place or cought to be killed in the City Hall bases. These killings are Major BASESCU's programme of getting rid of the dogs in Bucharest.
Letter against babyseal hunting November 07, 2005 1:02 PM
The seal pups are beaten or shot, both of which cause great pain. Observers report that Canada's animal welfare regulations are not being followed or enforced. Sealers have been observed skinning many seals while the pups are still alive and conscious.Why do you do this cruel hunt?
The Canadian government has provided no scientific evidence that the seal populations of Labrador and Newfoundland can withstand the new quota, which allows hunters to kill nearly a million seals over three years.Why do you let the number of seals killed is unsustainable and growing?
The Canadian Department of Fisheries, which is charged with overseeing the hunt, doesn't punish hunters who kill the seals inhumanely or who exceed the quota. It ignores the abuse of animals and rewards overkilling with higher quotas.Why does the government noting to control the hunt adequately?
The subsidies that the government has poured into the seal hunt since 1995, reportedly more than $20 million, is an investment in cruelty. Why does the goverment subsid this barbaric hunt?
Claims that the hunt is part of the indigenous cultures of Labrador and Newfoundland are a cloak for this commercial industry. With 11,185 commercial sealing licenses issued in 2001, this cannot be considered a local cultural event. It's commerce, just like any other industry.Why The seal hunt is misrepresented to the public?
. Scientific evidence doesn't back up the government's claim that seals are eating too many cod. Even the government's own scientists have pointed to over-fishing as the actual culprit in the crash of the cod industry. There's also reason to believe that killing off seals might even worsen the cod stock's condition.Why does the Canadian government also misrepresents the threat seals pose to the North Atlantic cod industry?
Instead of subsidizing the cruelty and waste of life, the government must stop it. Citizens of Canada and other countries should tell the Canadian government to outlaw the seal hunt
Non-Canadian citizens should signal their disapproval of the seal hunt by telling the Canadian Tourism Commission that they won't be visiting Canada until the government bans the hunt.
This are my questions, please answer my, because I don,t understand why, this cruelty to babyseals are going on and on, I"m loking forwards to your answers.
please support our livestock production reduction petition for a sustainable agricultural system! April 04, 2009 1:21 AM
Hi all!!
The University of California, San Diego student organization:
VEG (Vegetarian Environmentalist Group) is happy to present an online
petition which aims to reduce the livestock industry via means of
removal of governmental subsidies for livestock farmers as well as
implementation of tax for livestock products for their detrimental
external social burden on the environment. If you are still unfamiliar
with the relationship between livestock production and the environment,
I have listed the key facts below.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: SUMMARY OF LIVESTOCK'S IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT(SOURCE: 2006 UNITED NATIONS FAO REPORT, LIVESTOCK'S LONG
SHADOW)
Our current livestock industry is responsible for emitting 37%
of all human-induced Methane, 65% of all human-induced Nitrous Oxide,
9% of all human-induced Carbon Dioxide, and 64% of human-induced
Ammonia. The Carbon Dioxide equivalent of livestock industry emissions
is 18%, which is greater than all transportation combined
(transportation CO2 equivalent is 12%). So, we need to decrease the
livestock industry along with turning to alternative transportation
systems (like biking!!). We cannot just pin global warming on one
single source and go from there, all aspects need to adapt to the
current climate crisis.
In addition to the greenhouse gas emissions, livestock current
needs 36% of the world grain and 74% of the world soy to sustain its
industry. If you think about it, this is not sustainable at all in the
long run. It is definitely not an efficient usage of world crop
supplies.
Now let's talk water. Water is essential for survival. Did you
know that California currently imports 100% of its clean water supply?
Yes... and we are not increasing our world water supply. Yes, there are
technologies being researched to desaltize the ocean waters, but think
about the cost of that. It's not a quick and easy solution. The best
solution would be for everyone to be frugal. While major medias are
telling us to conserve water during showers and toothbrushing, they are
leaving out a major part of water usage.According to the Stockholm
International Water Institute, 20% of all world water supply goes to
industries, 10% of all water goes to households, and 70% of all water
goes to producing food. These statistics awaken a lot of people because
if you think about how much water we use in industries and households
(its A LOT), many folds more is going to agriculture. Now get this:
within the agricultural business (which uses 70% of all our clean
water), 1 POUND OF LETTUCE takes 23 gallons of water to produce, 1
POUND OF WHEAT takes 25 gallons of water, 1 POUND OF APPLES take 49
gallons of water, 1 POUND OF CHICKEN takes 815 gallons of water, 1
POUND OF PORK takes 1,630 gallons of water, and 1 POUND OF BEEF takes
5,214 gallons of water. (You can do some research online to see how to
have defined these water usage values according to pounds) So now the
question is, one plate of dinner will fill most of us up (some go for
seconds, thirds, but anyways..). If you fill that one plate with meat,
that's 6000 gallons of water or more. If you fill that one plate up
with rice and veggies (this can be tasty faux meat too!), it takes less
than 100 gallons of water. Please, be frugal and responsible. Imagine a
planet with no more water.
Here are just some additional costs of livestock production.
Did you know that livestock farming land takes up 70% of all
agricultural land, and 30% of world's ice-free terrestrial surface?
Yup. And for the forest lovers (we should all love forests, they are
the lungs of our planet), 70% of the Amazon rainforest is currently
being occupied by pastures; feedcrops occupy a large sector of the
remaining 30%.Everyone talks about saving energy now with new bulbs,
solar power, etc. Well why not talk about food, too. The livestock
sector requires 16 times more fossil fuel energy than other sectors of
agriculture. Moreover, livestock is increasingly being fed with grains
and cereals that could have been consumed by humans, converting only up
to 33% of its nutrients for our consumption.
Lastly, the U.S. livestock sector alone
produces 900 million tons of manure annually. Immense lagoons used to
store waste are known to heavily degrade the surrounding air and water,
creating dead zones within our clean bodies of water. Besides harming
our precious marine life, it's nice to know that we are surrounded by
80% of water of this planet. So if our ocean dies, we probably don't
have much of a chance for survival either.
All in all, it's good that we are more aware of global warming and
finally (most people) recognize it as partially (if not mostly) human
caused. Now, besides being frugal, using a reusable bag, riding a bike
or taking the bus, changing lightbulbs, and saving shower time, please
also change your diet. It really makes a huge impact, even though it
seems like you're just intaking a piece of meat, that piece of meat
came from loads of environmental damage (as well as suffering!).
Inaction is inexcusable. If you're a non-vegetarian, go vegetarian. If
youre already a vegetarian, go vegan. If youre already a vegan... go
organic
Of course, if you can go straight to organic vegan that is the best for
the environment in terms of pers