accepted
Do you really think it matters?
Pete & Myke!
And you have the cheek to call me anti-semetic, for simply pointing out that it's in Zionists interests to exaggerate real or imagined threats in Venezuela and elsewhere in order to encourage immigration to Israel!
You can see that there never was any Star of David/Swastika mashup graphic." 
[
Death to the WEB oh 
Bu$hco/Venezuelan opposition.
for Arsy TV. 
I can't possibly link the answers with questions/statements without reference points. It is easier to read original Greek texts without spaces between the words than this. 
[
.
SOB ,That really is worthy of invoking Hitler's name. What crimes against humanity can we expect fom him next?
[
Thats no evidence to suggest Hugo to deny Hugo is evidence of ethical progressinism because they wont allow protest marches on the tv- they dont here in england. I ask the stations and they say they have their licences revoked if they did, advertise a protest. Interests of national security !
to
fully investigate all attacks on journalists and media and ensure that
those responsible are brought to justice. The delegation was
particularly concerned with the murder of photographer Jorge Tortoza,
who was killed by a sniper who was shooting from a government building
during an anti-Chavez demonstration on 11 April.
Big media outlets are up in arms over the Venezuelan government’s decision not to renew the license for TV network Radio Television Caracas (RCTV). The reports have seriously watered down the charges against the station. The New York Times describes the situation as a political beef with the station’s “editorial policies,” while the Independent calls it retaliation against RCTV “for being critical” of Chavez. Sort of like Timothy McVeigh was “critical” of the U.S. government.
Here’s a rundown how the station spent its spring break a few years back:
> In April 2002, coup organizers plan an anti-government march in downtown Caracas, attracting thousands of demonstrators. RCTV and other private stations encourage Venezuelans to participate. At the last minute, the route of the march is redirected toward the presidential palace, and mercenaries begin firing on the crowd, killing 18.
> Amidst the bloody chaos, rebel military leaders kidnap President Chavez and transport him to a Caribbean island. RCTV and other private stations broadcast a statement that Chavez had…um… resigned.
> Interim President Pedro Carmona (Pedro the Brief) promptly suspends the Venezuelan Constitution, dissolves Congress and the Supreme Court, and basically appoints himself emperor. RCTV president Marcel Granier is there for the fun .
> Coup leaders appear on television and explain how it all went down. They single out RCTV, thanking the network for its assistance.
> RCTV calls on Venezuelans to rat out friends and neighbors who had been associated with the Chavez administration and turn them in for arrest.
> When word gets out to the public, via international reports, that this had been a coup, not a resignation, RCTV bans its reporters from covering the story.
> 24 hours later, after widespread popular protests surround the presidential palace and the military captures coup leaders, RCTV suspends its news programming in favor of an emergency cartoon marathon.
If this happened in the U.S., station officials would be in jail or at Guantanamo. Suspending their license seems like a sane, if merciful, step.
http://www.borev.net/top_venezuela_media_storylines/closing_media_outlets/
, this would mean expelling Venezuela from the OAS, as a U.S. state department official recently threatened to do. Please call the U.S. state department or your foreign ministry and tell them to withdraw their ambassadors from Venezuela. 
1960 Eisenhower authorizes covert actions to get rid of Castro. Among other things, the CIA tries assassinating him with exploding cigars and poisoned milkshakes. Other covert actions against Cuba include burning sugar fields, blowing up boats in Cuban harbors, and sabotaging industrial equipment.
You don't have to be a believer in conspiracy theories to assume that clearly the Time Magazine editorial board was not happy with the choice of its readers! Surely the so-called "liberal" magazine did not like the result of its own poll and decided to pick its own candidate, you. 
