It's a good start. I'm not very optimistic about your chances of getting these banned. India didn't sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty, but our President, in all his wisdom, has decided to reward them with technology sharing anyway.
[send green star]
[
accepted]
I'm happy to bring some optimism here... ..For example, use of chemical weapons are banned
by the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), which entered into force in 1997.
States that have neither signed nor acceded to the Chemical Weapons Convention
As at 23 February 2006
The Convention was open for signature from 13 January 1993 through
28 April 1997. After that date, States which did not sign the
Convention can accede to it.
1.
Angola
2.
Barbados
3.
Democratic
People's Republic of Korea
4.
Egypt
5.
Iraq
6.
Lebanon
7.
Somalia
8.
Syrian Arab Republic Signatory States which have not yet ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention
As at 23 February 2006
1.
Bahamas
02-03-94
2.
Central
African Republic
14-01-93
3.
Comoros
13-01-93
4.
Congo
15-01-93
5.
Dominican
Republic
13-01-93
6.
Guinea-Bissau
14-01-93
7.
Israel
13-01-93
8.
Myanmar
14-01-93
A Global Convention to Ban
Chemical Weapons
In
1997, a new kind of disarmament treaty entered into force. The purpose of this
novel international effort, the Chemical Weapons Convention, is to ban the development,
production, stockpiling, use or transfer of chemical weapons.
The
goal of the Convention is to eliminate chemical weapons, forever, by destroying
the existing stockpiles and preventing the production of new chemical weapons.
An ever-expanding community of nations, now numbering 164 States Parties
to
the Convention (as at 22 June 2004), is dedicated to achieving this disarmament
goal. Collectively, these countries, or Member States, form the Organisation
for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. A major Review Conference has just
assessed progress over the first six years of the Convention's implementation
and has set the agenda for the future.
The six States Parties that have declared chemical weapons have to destroy over
eight million items, including munitions and containers —in total, seventy
thousand metric tonnes of extremely toxic chemical agents. By comparison, a
tiny drop of nerve agent, no larger than the head of a pin, can kill an adult
within minutes after exposure.
The OPCW monitors and verifies that the destruction process is irreversible.
At the same time, the State Party shall place the highest priority on the safety
of people and the protection of the environment when chemical weapons are destroyed.
The
world's chemical industry manufactures the compounds we depend upon for daily
life. Some very common chemicals can, if misused, be employed directly, or through
further synthesis with other substances, as chemical weapons. Together with
governments, and with the support of the global chemical industry, the OPCW
monitors the trade and production of the “dual-use” chemicals so
that they are not diverted from their peaceful purposes.
The one thing I could not find was a break down of the current status of decommisioning or an estimate of how many countries have failed to declare weapons - I think the few that declared in 1997 can't be all surely?
[send green star]