Are Free Lunches Enough to Combat Child Poverty in the U.S.?
School’s out for summer, but in parts of rural Tennessee, the yellow bus is still running. Only instead of delivering children to school, it’s bringing them a free lunch every day. On the outside of the bus, the familiar yellow-and-black design has been changed to read: “Kids Eat FREE!”
Think about it: with so many children in the U.S. living in poverty, schools have become the main source of food for many of them. Free-and-reduced-price meals now include breakfast, lunch, snacks and even free backpacks of canned goods, in some cases.
But all that stops in the summer.
The Washington Post explains:
Governors came together to form a task force. Michelle Obama suggested items for a menu. Food banks opened thousands of summer cafes, and still only about 15 percent of eligible children received regular summer meals.
So, earlier this year, a food bank in Tennessee came up with a plan to reverse the model. Instead of relying on children to find their own transportation to summer meal sites, it would bring food to children. The food bank bought four used school buses for $4,000 each and designed routes that snake through some of the most destitute land in the country, where poverty rates have almost doubled since 2009 and two-thirds of children qualify for free meals.
Two-thirds may seem abnormally high, but as Kids Count reported last month, a shocking 23 percent of children live in poverty in this country, on average.
Tennessee actually comes in at #39 for the overall well-being of children and families, while Louisiana, Mississippi and New Mexico come in at #48, #49 and #50, respectively.
So what do the children of rural Tennessee actually get for lunch?
On the day that Washington Post reporter Eli Saslow visited, he found that each sack lunch contained two ounces of celery sticks, four ounces of canned oranges, chocolate milk and a bologna sandwich. Each meal was purchased for $3.47 and contained about 750 calories.
There are also strict rules that the USDA implemented: no seconds, no extra milks, no children taking food homeand no free meals for anyone over 18 unless they are disabled.
Here’s a snippet of what Saslow witnessed as he traveled with the yellow food truck:
On this day, what she saw at the first stop was five siblings arriving in clothes still stained from the pizza sauce they had been served on the bus the day before. “Did you get a chance to change today?” Anderson (a food bank employee) asked one of them, a 10-year-old girl. “Into what?” she said.
Next, at the second stop, a 7-year-old whose parents were both at work arrived carrying his 1-year-old sister in nothing but a diaper, spoon-feeding her juice from the bottom of his fruit cocktail cup. “She can’t eat chunks yet,” he said.
At the third stop, a high school football player pleaded for extra milk; at the fourth, teenagers fired rifles at cans up the road; at the fifth, always the most crowded, kids, parents and dogs waited in the shade under the trailer park’s only tree.
Turning a school bus into a food truck is certainly better than letting kids starve but, really, is this summer food truck program the government’s answer to childhood poverty and hunger?
And to all those Republicans who are fighting so hard to limit abortion rights for women across the country, do you actually care about those babies once they are born? Does it bother you to know what almost one fourth of the children in the U.S. are living in poverty, and don’t get enough to eat every day?
Banks get bailouts, Big Oil and Coal get tax breaks, and people go hungry.
What’s wrong with this picture? Where did the love go?
Photo Credit: thinkstock