START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
3,434,492 people care about Animal Welfare

$1000 Fine for Pets Without Seat Belts

$1000 Fine for Pets Without Seat Belts

As part of New Jersey’s Click It or or Ticket campaign, drivers are getting a reminder about the potentially hefty fines they’ll face if they’re caught driving with an unrestrained pet.

Under New Jersey Statute 4:22-18, having an unrestrained pet in a vehicle is considered animal cruelty, and drivers who don’t have them restrained will be subject to fines that range from $250 to $1,000 and as much as six months in jail.

“That’s for each offense,” said Col. Frank Rizzo, police superintendent for the New Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. “So, if you have more than one animal loose in your car, just do the math…”

The rationale behind the fines is safety, since officials believe that unrestrained animals can become a dangerous distraction and potentially cause an accident injuring drivers and themselves.

“What people come to realize only too late is that animals act like flying missiles in an impact and can not only hurt themselves but hurt their human family members, too,” said Rizzo.

While some states have laws to stop people from driving with pets in their laps or in the back of pickup trucks, New Jersey is the first to require restraints under an animal cruelty law. However, the statute in question is vague and doesn’t specifically say, or even imply, anything about restraints, only stating that animals should not be carried in a vehicle in a “cruel or inhumane manner.”

Incidentally, a ticket for a person not wearing a seat belt is only $46. In regards to distracted driving, the fine for texting while driving is only $100, although lawmakers are trying to double it.

Is just another intrusive money-making scheme for the state, or will it actually help keep pets safe? Do you drive with your pets restrained?

Related Stories:

Help Free Diego the Lion

Supreme Court Grants Stay of Execution for Onion

Pit Bulls Declared Inherently Dangerous in Maryland

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Photo credit: Thinkstock

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

383 comments

+ add your own
3:42PM PST on Nov 10, 2012

GREAT NEWS for pets. ARE YOU LISTENING MINNESOTA??????????????

8:37AM PDT on Aug 29, 2012

good

7:32AM PDT on Aug 24, 2012

The rest of the states should follow New Jersey's lead. Yes, pets should be restrained in all vehicles for everyone's safety. In addition, the fines for human non-compliance should be raised to equal the fine for pets. Maybe it will force people to be more responsible when driving. A large fine will make them think twice before breaking the law and possibly causing an accident. It is sad, however, that people have to be pushed into doing something that is really common sense. Unfortunately, common sense isn't that common.

3:48AM PDT on Aug 24, 2012

thanks

8:24PM PDT on Aug 23, 2012

Can they stop people from having dogs in back of trucks?

7:32PM PDT on Aug 23, 2012

Both my dogs have harnesses which attach to the seatbelts. The cats are in carriers. I strictly enforce this especially after hearing that if you are in an accident, with your dog, the paramedics/police have the right to shoot the dog to get to you if they feel the dog is a threat to them. A very scary thought of some trigger happy cop shooting my dogs. I also do it for the dogs' safety. (The kids are in seatbelts/car seats) However, I would like to propose a question to the rocket scientists in NJ who came up with this fine system: Since any BODY-a baby, child, adult, dog, cat-can be a distraction or become a flying missile on impact, just how is it that the fine for an unrestrained PET is up to $1000/6 mon in jail; whereas a human failing to wear a seatbelt is $46; texting $100! Hmmm,,,a little bias here? Now what is more distracting-that unrestrained, screaming toddler, or that teenager texting, or the sleeping poodle in the backseat? And what is more of a missile-that 250 lb passenger or the 20 lb dog? Every BODY needs to be restrained; no texting (fines should be $1000!) and the same fines for everyone-human or animal! What stupidity.

11:01AM PDT on Aug 22, 2012

Some dogs need cages for safety, but this is absurd, if no other load is required to be secured. Go chase the crooks at the top, instead of beating on people for common behaviour.

6:30AM PDT on Jul 30, 2012

Not ONLY do I drive with my cats in carriers, I belt the carriers in! I'm more worried about THEIR welfare than mine, to be honest. I know what's what. They don't understand. I see it the way I see keeping small children safe.

3:56PM PDT on Jul 10, 2012

I see this all the time--it's very dangerous to have pets loose in the care while driving.

10:32AM PDT on Jun 29, 2012

Very sensible. Thanks.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

I am appalled at the way schools/principals/teachers are handling the " dress code " situations Although…

I find this a most worthwhile article to remind us of how we can stand up and not be bystanders watching…

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches and writes about ancient Greek and Latin and is Online Advocacy and Marketing... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.