START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
732,470 people care about Women's Rights

1,000 Reasons to Trust Women

1,000 Reasons to Trust Women

 

Written by Colleen Crinion

As a clinic assistant at two Planned Parenthood clinics, I’ve listened to approximately 1,000 women tell me about their abortion decisions. These women came from all over the world. Some were mothers, students, wives or girlfriends; some were only girls. They were different in many ways, but what they wanted was the same: a safe abortion, without judgment or harassment.

Unfortunately, that is becoming harder and harder to obtain.

According to the latest state legislative round-up from the Guttmacher Institute, 944 reproductive-health-related laws were introduced in just the first quarter of this year. Half of these bills aim to restrict abortion access. Seventy-five of those abortion restrictions have been approved by at least one legislative chamber, and nine have been enacted. While this is not as high as the record-breaking 127 passed by at least one chamber in the first quarter of 2011, it is still a lot, especially for an election year (when candidates are warned to stay away from “divisive issues”). Among those that passed or are looking to pass in 2012 are several “heartbeat” bills, which either ask or mandate that women listen to the heartbeat of the fetus or embryo.

It’s difficult to read about such bills without getting frustrated. The basic assumption behind such legislation is that women do not know what is happening to them–that without these bills, women would get abortions out of ignorance. They assume that if women are not given the opportunity to hear the heartbeat, or in other cases, see an ultrasound or read state-mandated information (of questionable accuracy), that they just won’t know what they are doing. In even worse cases, states such as South Dakota mandate a trip to a crisis pregnancy center–which operate solely to shame women out of having an abortion. Apparently we can trust a woman to have and raise a child, just not to decide when to do it.

When I spoke with a woman who had originally planned her pregnancy with her husband only to have their circumstances change when he was deployed to Afghanistan, I knew that she was aware of what she was doing. She wanted to be a parent, but not a single parent. Likewise, when I spoke to a woman who was herself deploying to Iraq, I knew that she didn’t need to see an ultrasound or to listen to a heartbeat to know what her decision entailed. She was doing what was needed in order to serve her country.

I also think it’s safe to say that the patients who were already mothers had a pretty good idea of what was going on in their bodies. They knew that those pregnancies they carried would eventually come to term and that they would have to raise another child. This was not new territory for them. Some of these mothers were so sick during their pregnancies that they were not able to work or care for their children. Other mothers could not afford another pregnancy for financial reasons. Still others simply did not want to be pregnant again.

All of these women, for all of their reasons, knew what they were doing. When they did have questions, the clinic staff answered them. Once in a while a woman would ask to see the ultrasound, so the clinic assistant would show it to her. As a patient, she had a right to access her medical file, of which the ultrasound was a part. Unlike crisis pregnancy centers, however, we used medically accurate language and did not condemn anyone for her decision. In the rare cases in which a woman wasn’t sure what to do, a counselor would talk to her, and sometimes even suggest that she go home and think for a while longer. Regardless, the final decision was always hers. More often than not, however, our patients had already thought about what they needed to do, and they just needed it done–safely and with dignity. We owe them that much. Our sisters, our friends, our mothers, our daughters, our girlfriends and our wives deserve our respect. We can trust them, and our laws should reflect that.

This post was originally published by Ms. Magazine.

 

Related Stories:

Texas AG Makes Reckless Comparison Between Planned Parenthood, Terrorists

Planned Parenthood Suspended Medical Abortions in Wisconsin

Anti-Immigrant and Anti-Choice Laws Popping Up in Same States

 

Read more: , , , , , ,

Photo from mikesoron via flickr

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

101 comments

+ add your own
5:33PM PDT on Aug 20, 2012

GOP believe cells like zygotes have rights, starving, neglected and abused children do not.

2:26PM PDT on Aug 18, 2012

killing a baby because you made a bad decision is wrong. Incest, rape and severe medical issues should be the ONLY reasons for abortion. I knew girls who would sleep around, get knocked up, get an abortion, and go back to sleeping around. "Oops, I skipped a pill. It's okay, on the off chance you knock me up, I'll just kill it". It's wrong. Period

10:31AM PDT on May 9, 2012

it is no one's f'n business what a woman chooses to do for herself, i am soooooo disgusted each and every time i read see hear about all this f'n crap, take your personal opinion and shove it where the sun does not shine,LEAVE WOMAN ALONE and THEIR BODIES,THEIR CHIOCE... i hate anti-abortionists in everyway and everything you think, which is crap...

1:27PM PDT on May 7, 2012

Killing another person to make your life easier? Really?

10:57AM PDT on May 7, 2012

sex work should be decriminalised, on that I agree. But the idea that there will be any great reduction in rape murder and abortion is naive, to say the least. Not all sex workers are women, and not all women are sex workers. I thought that was kinda obvious!

10:27AM PDT on May 7, 2012

Frank Y, I have to disagree. Rape is about power, not sex. No amount of legal sex work can correct rape because of that. I’m not saying that the murder rate wouldn’t go down, and regulation and openness could certainly help prevent human trafficking with the right level of oversight in place, but I’m not sure how it would prevent abortion either.

8:46AM PDT on May 7, 2012

Good idea David. Perhaps women's groups, and all the Democratic clubs should start a collection of wire coat hangars, and groups of women deliver them personally to all the anti-choice lawmakers.

8:45AM PDT on May 7, 2012

It is not an easy decision to make. It is harder still to do.

It is nobody's business but the woman and her doctor.

The extremists need to tend to their own life and stop trying to enforce their will on others.

5:33AM PDT on May 7, 2012

It sure is a great time to be a woman in the land of brave and the land of the free!!

4:46AM PDT on May 7, 2012

I am a male and have no right to comment on a woman's right to choose. The men who do comment are usually control freaks who feel threatened by women !

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Colleen H. Colleen H. is an Online Campaigner with Care2 and a recent transplant to San Francisco from the East... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.