START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
2,098,325 people care about Politics

5 Criticisms of Obama’s NSA Speech

5 Criticisms of Obama’s NSA Speech

In the face of ongoing criticism of the NSA spy program, President Barack Obama delivered a long-awaited speech (read the full text here) addressing reforms to the NSA. If the speech was designed to quell fears, it hasn’t entirely worked, with pundits to both the left and the right complaining about the content of Obama’s speech. Here are some of their concerns:

1. A Call to Placate, Not Fix

Glenn Greenwald, The Guardian’s reporter who has pivotal in releasing the Edward Snowden leaks, sees Obama’s speech as an attempt to pacify the U.S. public without changing much of anything. In an op-ed, he writes:

The crux of this tactic is that US political leaders pretend to validate and even channel public anger by acknowledging that there are ‘serious questions that have been raised.’ They vow changes to fix the system and ensure these problems never happen again. And they then set out, with their actions, to do exactly the opposite; to make the system prettier and more politically palatable with empty, cosmetic ‘reforms’ so as to placate public anger while leaving the system fundamentally unchanged, even more immune than before to serious challenge.


2. No Actual Reform

Say what you will about Senator Rand Paul’s other politics, but he’s usually on point when it comes to defending the Fourth Amendment. After listening to Obama’s speech, Sen. Paul said, “I didn’t hear any lessening of the spying on Americans or collecting records of Americans. I heard that trust me, I’m going to put some more safeguards in place, but I’m going to keep right on collecting every American’s records.”

Paul is not alone in this perspective. Though Obama called for minor reforms, none of them would undermine the major objection the NSA program in the first place: the massive collection of private information of innocent American citizens.


3. Obama Wants to Hand Over the Data to Someone Else… To Be Determined

As Mark Murray, Senior Political Editor at NBC News, points out, Obama’s plan is to take the mass collection of data out of the hands of the government and give it to… well, someone else.

This move just leads to more questions. Why would a third party that has access to all of our data be any less invasive and offensive? And who is this group that will hold the calls, texts, and emails instead?

For the latter question, Obama admits he hasn’t figured that out yet. Instead, the President wants more “time” to figure out the answer to this question. Or, he may just be asking for extra time in the hopes that the American public will forget about it.


4. Typical Fear-Mongering

CNN’s Carl Lavin counted nine references to September 11th in Obama’s speech. The underlying message was clear – Obama is continuing to push for the NSA as an important tool for counterterrorism, despite the fact that most of the criticisms of the program are about the far-reaching, unconstitutional privileges the NSA has granted itself that have nothing to do with terrorism.


5. No Reason to Trust

Of course, the biggest criticism might come from Joe Biden himself. He said, “The real question here is: what do they do with this information that they collect that does not have anything to do with Al-Qaeda? And we’ve got to trust the President and the Vice President of the United States that they’re doing the right thing? Don’t count me in on that.”

Okay, admittedly, that segment is from 2006, a couple of years before Biden became he was a candidate for Vice President. Nonetheless, if Biden has any integrity, he’ll start speaking out more harshly about this program with which he’s now complicit. In his speech, Obama asked for the people to regain trust in the government, yet after a breach like the one we’ve discovered — like Biden said — why should we?

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
8:03PM PDT on Mar 26, 2014

Amen! Oh that's right...don't think we're suppose to pray to Our Heavenly Father either :(

4:40AM PST on Jan 31, 2014

He is really good at giving speeches, not so good at governing. He seems to have no idea how to do the job. He seems to get nothing done except speeches and vacations.

8:22AM PST on Jan 29, 2014

Anyone else having problems signing the petition "Its time to shutdown the NSA" by Jim Head?

7:30PM PST on Jan 27, 2014

@ Bruce C D. others might also be interested. : When I am writing a long post that might go over the limit, I "copy" it before I hit the "add comment" button. Then, if the post is truncated, I "paste" it back into the "add your comment" box, and delete all or most of what has been successfully posted, put (cont). in front, and post the remainder. Saves having to remember and re-type what was cut off.
"Most places prominently advise the poster of such limitations before posting,"
Many allow the poster to go back and edit their own posts, too. We all make typos.

5:54PM PST on Jan 25, 2014

who's at war with whom.....who is spying on who.....when your interests undermine and interfere with the interests of the state...... statute that the United Kingdom instituted around 1914....Defence of the Realm ..... we are all potentially enemies of the state......memories of the 60s and 70s......

8:54PM PST on Jan 23, 2014

Thank-you for sharing this interesting article........

3:00PM PST on Jan 23, 2014

Our government spying and collecting data on its citizens is wrong and if those in office don't understand why it's wrong then they shouldn't be in office. I think Snowden is a hero and should get the medal of freedom because he gets what's wrong with the NSA.

6:53PM PST on Jan 22, 2014

Ron B. Great comment -- thanks!

6:44PM PST on Jan 22, 2014

I agree that Obama has been disappointing as a president because he's lied - er...equivocated - like many other politicians but I can't help remembering who he was running against.

Now really, I can't even imagine where this country would be with McCain and (egad) Palin!

6:14PM PST on Jan 22, 2014

The sixth criticism. The speech did not go far enough. We do not need the NSA spying on American citizens who have dome nothing wrong and storing the collected data ad infinitum. The NSA has proven that they cannot be trusted and neither can the phone companies like Verizon who just destroyed net neutrality. The information should not be collected and stored in the first place. As the editor of the Harvard Law Review President Obama should be familiar with the fourth amendment of the US Constitution which bans unwarranted search and seizures and the concept of innocent until proven guilty.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Great its about time something was done. When shopping at Iceland supermarket produce was packed in carrier…

There is simply no place for animal testing in today's world.

He really is super cute! I love that he snores! Too adorable and funny!

meet our writers

Beth Buczynski Beth is a freelance writer and editor living in the Rocky Mountain West. So far, Beth has lived in... more
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!