START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
538,744 people care about Real Food

5 Misleading Words That Should Be Banned from Food Advertising

  • by
  • January 20, 2013
  • 10:00 am
5 Misleading Words That Should Be Banned from Food Advertising

The Leanwashing Index released its 2013 list of the top 5 words that should be banned from food advertising. The list was inspired by the appearance of “superfood” on Lake Superior State University’s 38th annual List of Words to be Banished.

Launched last year by EnviroMedia, the Leanwashing Index is a website that invites people to post and rate the validity of health claims made in advertising, marketing and packaging processed foods — on a scale of “authentic” to “bogus.” Claims that are exaggerated, misleading or false are examples of leanwashing, and the problem is that “it too often leads consumers to eat foods and engage in behaviors that are marketed as healthy, instead of foods and behaviors that are actually healthy.”

Without further ado, here are the 5 words that made the list this year, including a few of the more egregious examples of their misuse.

“Natural”
As many consumers know, there is no nutritional or legal definition of “natural” in the world of food and beverages, so manufacturers are free to use the word as they please. PepsiCo claims that its processed, carbonated beverage Sierra Mist is “natural” because the sugar used to sweeten it is derived from sugar beets. By calling Sierra Mist “the natural choice,” the company means to suggest that it is in some way healthier than the other sugar-sweetened sodas out there. Not so, of course. PepsiCo acknowledged, moreover, that the sugar beets they use are probably genetically modified.

“Made With”
Companies can claim that a food or beverage is “made with” real fruit or vegetables or whole grains, but it may not be “made with” much of it and it may not be good for you in any case. Take Kellogg’s Nutri-Grain Raspberry Cereal Bar, which the package says is “Made with Real Fruit & Whole Grains.” Whole grain oats and whole wheat flour do top the ingredients list, but the raspberry puree concentrate, or “real fruit,” is buried under a load of sugar in various forms (sugar, dextrose, fructose, invert sugar, corn syrup) and among many other industrial ingredients like artificial flavor, methylcellulose and red 40. Men’s Health magazine once named the cereal bar one of the 13 worst “healthy” foods in the supermarket. It’s an industrially processed cookie masquerading as a wholesome snack.

“Whole Grains”
Lucky Charms makes for a rather ridiculous example of a whole grain food, but it is in fact advertised by General Mills to contain “More Whole Grain than any other ingredient!” and is labeled as a “Whole Grain First Ingredient” cereal. The second ingredient, it may not surprise anyone familiar with the “magically delicious” cereal that debuted in 1964, is marshmallows. A bowl full of rainbow sugar puffs, whatever its whole grain content, is not a healthy way to start your day.

“Light”
Foods marketed and labeled as “light” are usually more processed than the original versions they are meant to stand in for. Manufacturers can’t reduce the fat or the number of calories in a food without altering its flavor, so sodium, sugar substitutes and an array of additives are often added to compensate. Lay’s Light Original Potato Chips, though advertised as fat free and with half the calories of regular potato chips, are cooked in olestra, which is not approved for sale in many countries, including the United Kingdom and Canada. It’s also supposed to interfere with the absorption of certain vitamins, which is why Frito-Lay adds vitamins A, D, E and K to the product.

“100 Calorie”
“100 Calorie” was named to the list of words that should be banned from food advertising because, Leanwashing Index explains, “cookies, chips and other processed snacks are marketed in 100-calorie packages, leading consumers to believe what’s inside is a healthy choice. Many of these should be labeled ‘empty calorie’ packages.” Case in point: Nabisco’s 100 Calorie Packs of Chips Ahoy thin crisps, Oreo thin crisps and Ritz Snack Mix. These snacks may help some consumers manage their weight, but they are certainly not contributing to their overall well-being.

What words would you like to see banned from food advertising?

 

Related Stories:

Which Food Labels Mean What They Say?

Food Labels Lie

Is Chobani Yogurt Really Natural?

 

Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

191 comments

+ add your own
2:48AM PDT on Apr 29, 2013

Ignore what the front of the box, package says and go to the nutritional panel and see how many ingredients are in it THEN check out the ingredients you havent a clue are and if they are more than what could be real then forget it and find something else. Like someone said below me, when you start learning about nutrition and learn what ingredients mean that arent natural, it is then that you learn and should put the product back on the shelf for if everyone does it then the manufacturers really do have to take notice of what it is thats in their product and it should be more proper food than artificial or chemicals or numbers. There is a site where you can learn or look up numbers as there is also a little red book.

6:46AM PDT on Apr 28, 2013

Thank you.

8:22AM PST on Mar 6, 2013

I agree. The words "natural" and "made with" are extremely and intentionally misleading. They are often lies, actually.

8:48AM PST on Feb 9, 2013

Thanks for the info

9:01AM PST on Feb 3, 2013

If you are truly interested in nutrition, educate yourself. Then these "trickster" labels will not bamboozle you. So many, I know, do not really care anyway. So sad. When I talk of the above and more, I get a glazed look.

11:09AM PST on Feb 2, 2013

I agree, words like natural used in advertising is misleading because so often there isn't really much natural substances in the product. I think it is not nice to play on consumers that are not aware/don't have the time/access to product research to find out for themselves. Consumers put a lot of trust in companies when they buy their products and they shouldn't be told wrong information.

2:52AM PST on Feb 2, 2013

Let's beware of words

1:25AM PST on Jan 30, 2013

Thanks, at least the "100 calorie" snack really is 100 calories, it may be empty calories, but in part they aren't misleading anyone.

5:39AM PST on Jan 29, 2013

Changed labelling isn't a bad idea. But, really, if we actually draw the conclusions listed under each example, we are not very bright. We have the responsibility of thinking the claim through, also.

4:38PM PST on Jan 28, 2013

totally agree with this. there should be a better system for this but i also think there are a lot of foods that are healthy that the FDA say we cannot eat but people over in EUR can eat and are perfectly fine and as far as I understand they are humans also and their bodies function like ours in the good old USofA so why are some foods banned idk I am no expert. I just want to try real haggis lol

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

This really makes me mad, most of these people did NOT asked to be homeless. What we need to do is to…

dogs are truly better than 98% of humanity. They love from their hearts and will die for their people.…

EXCELLENT ARTICLE These Hunters do not contribute to local economies in Africa they destroy kill…

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches ancient Greek, Latin and Classics at Saint Peter's University in New Jersey.... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.