START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

5 Reasons to Support a Ban on Ex-Gay Therapy

5 Reasons to Support a Ban on Ex-Gay Therapy
  • 1 of 2


The California Senate sent the state’s proposed ban on ex-gay therapy for minors to Governor Jerry Brown’s desk on Thursday. Here are five reasons Governor Brown should sign the legislation.

1) Ex-gay therapy treats homosexuality like a disorder — even though it isn’t.

Homosexuality was depathologized by the American Psychiatric Association in 1973. This means that homosexuality in and of itself is no longer considered a mental illness or disorder. Since then, all mainstream medical bodies have moved forward under the understanding that it is anxiety about sexuality and not homosexuality that should be of concern to medical professionals. However, you will often see ex-gay therapy pushers using the phrase “people suffering from Same-Sex Attraction” when referring to their work in trying to “cure” homosexuality. This creates a pathology where there isn’t one and willfully misdiagnoses the real reasons why someone might be unhappy being homosexual: discrimination, whether from secular or, more usually, religious quarters.

2) Ex-gay therapy’s effectiveness has never been proven by mainstream science.

The “Choosing to Change” lie pedaled by ex-gay therapists is a house of cards built mainly on one very flawed study, a 2001 research piece carried out by Doctor Robert Spitzer that was published in the well respected Archives of Sexual Behavior. Spitzer, who was instrumental in the depathologizing of homosexuality, claimed that his study of 200 participants had shown that people really could leave homosexuality behind.

Except the study was deeply flawed. By Dr. Spitzer’s own admission, most recently reiterated earlier this year, the study in fact only proved that the study’s participants, all already involved in sexuality change efforts, reported believing their sexuality had changed. The study also failed to track participants over any length of time to see if this self-reported change was maintained.

Spitzer has recanted his view of the study and apologized to the gay community for the harms he acknowledges the, albeit well-meaning, study may have caused. Even so, groups like NARTH and PFOX continue to this day to maintain that science is on their side, despite there being no independent peer-reviewed material that agrees sexual orientation change is effective. This lack of evidence has even caused leaders of Exodus, one of the most high-profiled ex-gay groups, to drop sexual orientation change efforts in favor of promoting abstinence.

3) Ex-gay therapy is not an appropriate treatment for anxiety over sexuality.

While in a very small number of cases it may be necessary to attempt to reduce a patient’s level of sexual attraction in order to reduce the anxiety they feel over their sexuality, mainstream medical bodies like the American Psychological Association have all made it policy that in no circumstances should homosexuality be treated as a root cause of anxiety. Rather, the focus should be on helping patients overcome the damaging effects of prejudice, discrimination and alienation.

Indeed, the APA writes regarding homosexuality on its website:

Helpful responses of a therapist treating an individual who is troubled about her or his same-sex attractions include helping that person actively cope with social prejudices against homosexuality, successfully resolve issues associated with and resulting from internal conflicts, and actively lead a happy and satisfying life.

Ex-gay therapy has no support among mainstream medical authorities, therefore any therapist offering it as a viable treatment to sexual orientation anxiety or related distress should immediately be suspect.

  • 1 of 2

Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Image used under the Creative Commons Attribution License with thanks to Talk Radio News Service.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
11:15AM PST on Dec 3, 2012

Thank you California!! And thank you SPLC! We must end the fraud! It's OK to be gay!!!

7:09AM PST on Dec 3, 2012

"Don't like gay marriages? Don't get one. Don't like cigarettes? Don't smoke them. Don't like abortions? Don't get one. Don't like sex? Don't have it. Don't like drugs? Don't do them. Don't like porn? Don't watch it. Don't like alcohol? Don't drink it.. Don't like guns? Don't buy one. Don't like your rights taken away? Don't take away someone else's."

8:50AM PDT on Oct 31, 2012

The basis of conflating good morality
with sociopathy:

Create demons. Float a false (self-serving)
ideology, or slander an existing reasonable one.

Identify as demons anyone not conforming.

Except for medievel MD/spirit authorities burning
midwives at the stake, women lacked near equality
till recently and it was just men afraid of being
wrongly demonized.

It created the would-be demons within the demonizing
communities, such that the hypocritical ones actually
could serve as having been foreseen, and thus proving
a morality.

1: Virtually all murderers of gays have
proven being gay.
2: History's greatest control freaks have
been gay. Hitler: famously feminine.
JFK's killers: gay fascists.

Otherwise, gays, of course, served the numeric genetic
advantage of the group upon a mother's having already had
enough sons.

The above is also why the demonizer in this particular
witch-hunt will always be a good candidate for gay gene

Pen Name Used

2:38PM PDT on Oct 14, 2012

You can't fix what isn't broken. "Love the skin you're in"

10:03AM PDT on Sep 17, 2012

I'll give one reason. It hurts people. I have a gay son who didn't come out of the closet until he was about 30! I tried to coax him out and so did my husband. We suspected he was and tried to let him know we thought that it's a normal expression of sexuality. Still, with all the hate in the world I can understand why he was relectant. We didn't know his older brother, my oldest son, threated to "beat him up" if he was gay. Well, I stepped in. Now they get along fine.

Stand up for LGBT rights!

6:29AM PDT on Sep 14, 2012

Denise is right

11:24AM PDT on Sep 9, 2012

From what I've read on the subject, it was political action, not medical, that depathologized homosexuality. Certain activist homosexuals lobbied for it, in other words, because they didn't like being considered sick. However, doctors were not necessarily pushing for the change though now you wouldn't know it because it's considered politically incorrect to discuss the subject.

Also, there is a legitimate section of the homosexual population who find ex-gay therapy helpful. For that reason alone, no one should ban it for any reason.

8:17PM PDT on Sep 6, 2012

Matt B, are you arguing for the sake of arguing? First you were saying being gay was a choice, then you said that it was only about sex, not you changed your stance completely to match what everyone has been say, then added some paranoid rant about freedoms. Yes, I will fight to ban anything that is harmful to people. It's more than I don't like it, its the fact that people are getting hurt. If a chruch teaches homosexuality is a sin, I won't like it but I'm not going to fight to ban churches. However, if a practice is ruining peoples lives and destorying their minds, bodies, spirits (or whatever you want to refer to that esscence as), then yes, it should be banned, whether it's religious based or not.

7:50AM PDT on Sep 6, 2012

Matt, re your 7:33 posting. I don't think anybody is really that obssessive about eliminating things they "don't like". I don't like religion but if it floats someone else's boat I could care less. The same with politics. You tolerate things you don't like in order to keep things civil but a lot of people don't tolerate gays because that conflicts with their religious or social beliefs. When religion & personal opinions thus effect others they become themselves intolerant & that particular aspect should perhaps be eliminated as you put it. As you said, the nation was supposedly built on "freedom & tolerance" & as far as I'm concerned, telling a gay person that is a choice & making them undergo some kind of therapy is intolerance & imposition of your belief & opinion on others.
People make it more of an issue than it needs to be. People are afraid if someone doesn't conform to their way of thinking. Why should anyone care about another person's consensual practices? I don't care about yours if they don't effect me. Let it be. If someone wants therapy, as useless as I feel it is, fine. If it is coerced & makes the person feel guilty or dirty or "sick" then it is WRONG!

6:36AM PDT on Sep 6, 2012

It's so sad the damage that ex-gay therapy can do to a person emotionally and spiritually. I definitely support banning the practice.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

As for asking Lynda about whether she has tried preparing grains by soaking, sprouting or fermenting…

"Darlene, you own what you stated, I will not waste my time going through my Word Files...ARs't and vega…

They need to publish the names of the current members and we could make a publicity campaign and crash…

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!