START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,231,147 people care about Environment & Wildlife

50 Years After “Silent Spring,” What Would Rachel Say?

50 Years After “Silent Spring,” What Would Rachel Say?

What would Rachel Carson have to say about the environment if she were alive today?

Tomorrow is the 50th birthday of Carson’s “Silent Spring.” First published in serial form in the New Yorker and then as a Houghton Mifflin best seller in 1962, this densely researched and beautifully written attack on the indiscriminate use of pesticides caused a revolution in public opinion. Eventually it was a major factor in the founding of the Environmental Protection Agency in 1970.

I came to this book late in its life, discovering it on my bedside table when I was attending a writers’ colony in upstate New York some fifteen years ago. But there was something perfect about being in my bucolic cabin in the Catskills and absorbing Carson’s carefully detailed arguments warning the public about the long term effects of misusing pesticides, while reminding us that we are a vulnerable part of the natural world subject to the same damage as the rest of the ecosystem.

She did not, in fact, call for the abandonment of all chemical pesticides. She asked instead for a ban on the more insidious, long-lasting chemicals like DDT, against which there was increasing evidence of harmful effects to many living things.

She asked also that the other chemicals be used more judiciously and that the regulations for their manufacture and sale be tightened. Finally, she sent out a plea for alternative methods for fighting pests, so that the flow of deadly poisons into the environment might be restricted.

And she largely succeeded: laws and regulations have been tightened, and most of the chemicals whose use she criticized have been banned.

But what would Carson have to say about our environment today?

BPA

What would Carson have to say BPA, or Bisphenol A? BPA is an estrogen-mimicking chemical that can seep into food. Public concern about the chemicals has grown in the wake of studies such as one that found that, in 2,000 people, over 90 percent had BPA in their urine, not to mention a 2010 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announcement about the “potential effects of BPA on the brain, behavior and prostate gland of fetuses, infants and children.”

This could be our DDT.

Earlier this year, the FDA banned BPA from baby bottles and children’s sippy cups, but they have refused to ban it elsewhere, stating that the scientific evidence at this time does not suggest that the very low levels of human exposure to BPA through the diet are unsafe.

This is in spite of the fact that BPA has already been banned in children’s products in Canada, the European Union, China, Malaysia, South Africa and Argentina, as well as in 11 US states. Australia and Japan have banned it outright.

PESTICIDES

DDT may have been banned for use in the U.S.40 years ago, but a new study offers evidence about the dangerous effects of pesticides on honey bees. Care2′s Kristina Chew reports that biologists at the University of California at San Diego have found that a commonly used crop pesticide makes honey bees picky eaters.

The chemical in question is imidacloprid, which is a type of neonicotinoid — which has been linked to bees’ deaths. Imidacloprid has come under increasing scrutiny in the US and is banned for use in some crops in some parts of Europe. James Nieh, a professor of biology at UC San Diego who also authored the study, notes in Science Daily that, in 2006, imidacloprid was the sixth most commonly used pesticide in California. Besides being used in agriculture, it is also used in home gardens.

And while DDT may not be used in the U.S., there are numerous chemical pesticides used to control insects and other pests in livestock facilities. Industrial farms apply these chemicals directly to the skin, fur and feathers of livestock such as cattle, pigs and poultry in order to kill off flies, mites, spiders, cockroaches, ticks and other pests.

And then there’s all the concern about Monsanto’s Roundup pesticide.

Carson would be anxious about BPA and about today’s pesticides, but I believe she would also be thrilled at the size of the movement that she started. For surely, without Carson, we might not even be questioning these environmental disasters.

Millions of us around the world are calling out for the truth, refusing to let the Big Corporations smother us with their lies, and demanding action.

We must honor Carson’s memory and not remain silent.

 

Related Stories

Finally! FDA Bans BPA In Bottles, Sippy Cups

FDA Won’t Ban BPA In Food

Meet The 232 Politicians Who Voted Against Clean Air

 

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: USDAgov

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

280 comments

+ add your own
1:38AM PST on Jan 29, 2014

Your articles and contents are encouraging.

spring break Kroatien

4:31PM PST on Feb 22, 2013

I haven't a clue.........

3:12AM PST on Jan 3, 2013

For every chemical product we get banned, there's 100 more getting approved. It's an uphill fight and I feel we're not going to win. The chemical industry do not just settle with producing poisons; They are also a major part in the seed industry. The rice production in the world are controlled by giants as Monsanto. They have their hands in everything from seeds to fertilizers to pesticides. There used to be hundreds of thousands of different rice, wheat, corn, etc seeds and plants, but with the help of UN, there are very few left. This causes several problems, because a lot of those "disappeared" seeds, where resistant towards sicknesses and used by many farmers around the world,. With them now gone, farmers are in the hands of giant corporations. There have been many instances of failed crops and many, many farmers have gone out of business and their families go hungry. It also affects whole countries. This has to stop! The control of food production must go back in the hands of the producers and consumers in cooperation.

6:14PM PDT on Oct 11, 2012

Thanks for the article.

3:16PM PDT on Oct 11, 2012

Thanks.

5:40AM PDT on Oct 11, 2012

Voted: 'yes!'

1:00AM PDT on Oct 11, 2012

Yes, I agree, SIlent Spring should be required reading in high school.

8:44PM PDT on Oct 10, 2012

Maybe "Silent Spring" should be mandatory reading for students in junior high or high school.

8:32PM PDT on Oct 10, 2012

Thank you.

8:32PM PDT on Oct 10, 2012

Thank you.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Judy Molland An award-winning writer and teacher, Judy Molland is also an avid hiker, backpacker, and nature... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.