A Texas law that mandates women seeking an abortion receive a pre-abortion sonogram that is intended to pressure women to continue with her pregnancy was ruled constitutional by a federal appeals court, reversing an earlier order that enjoined the law from being enforced. In August, U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks held the law violated the First Amendment by improperly requiring doctors and patients to engage in government-mandated speech.
But the Fifth Circuit disagreed, holding the law fell within the power of the state to regulate abortion, sparking controversy almost the minute it was delivered.
Chief Justice Edith Jones wrote the opinion and may be best known for a ruling that upheld a Texas high school that kicked a cheerleader off her squad after she refused to chant the name of a basketball player that raped her.
The Texas law has become known as the “rape by the state” law and with good reason. The procedure passed, and now upheld as constitutional, will in most cases require a transvaginal probe in order to comply. That is because about 88 percent of abortions occur during the first 12 weeks of a pregnancy. Because the fetus is so small at this stage a traditional ultrasound performed on the wall of the abdomen with jelly cannot produce a clear image.
That means the Texas law mandates that a woman will be vaginally penetrated without an opportunity to refuse, and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals thinks this is constitutional.
Related Stories:
Teas Rise In Popularity As DIY Herbal Abortions
Florida Wants Abortions Punishable By Life In Prison
Read more: abortion, anti choice, gov. rick perry, pro-choice, pro-life, reproductive justice, reproductive rights, texas, ultrasound, waiting period
Photo from silviadinatale via flickr
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
Israel has done marijuana studies for decades... would be amazed what we don't know.
poor things, they have horrible lives
So sick of all the rudeness on here. If you feel the constant need to pick on others then you need h…
158 comments
+ add your ownThis just shows that judges aren't necessarily the brightest bulbs in the population. A woman makes a decision to have an abortion and then she contacts a provider -- the state has NO right to interfere IN ANY WAY with her decision, except to have as law, safe abortion providers.
This is WRONG in so many ways. I thought we, as women, were in charge of our bodies. I guess not.
Thanks for the article.
I'm not real surprised this happened in Texas - considering the types of politicians we get from there.
Ira: Thank you! Now we need to convence the 99% to vote Democrat and not allow the Repub's to have any power. They have paralized our political system to total defunction. We're like a ship without sails. And openedly declared not to allow Obama to steer the ship. Shame on them the Teaparty and all Republicians.
Ira: Thank you! Now we need to convence the 99% to vote Democrat and not allow the Repub's to have any power. They have paralized our political system to total defunction. We're like a ship without sails. And openedly declared not to allow Obama to steer the ship. Shame on them the Teaparty and all Republicians.
Does anyone seriously believe this kind of crap would pass muster if it involved men's bodies?
(Capitalization for emphasis) S* M* A* L* L* G* O* V* E* R* N* M* E* N* T -- THAT'S WHAT THE TBAGGER/REPUBLICAN/RELIGIOUS/EXTREMISTS SCREAM THEY WANT. "STAY OUT OF OUR LIVES!!!!!!" THEY SCREAM. ****UNLESS**** IT SERVES THEM BY """MANDATING"""" FORCING WOMEN TO BE VAGINALLY PENETRATED BY THE GESTAPO FILTHY HANDS OF MALE DOCTORS TO PREVENT WOMEN FROM HAVING A "SAY IN THEIR LIVES."
2012 - "VOTE DEMOCRAT* BEFORE THE 99%, IN ONE FORM OR ANOTHER, ARE ALL EXTERMINATED. THEY SAID IT COULDN'T HAPPEN WITH HITLER. WELL, GUESS WHAT........WE NEED A DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT AND A FULL DEMOCRATIC HOUSE AND SENATE TO SURVIVE. GOD WILL PROTECT US. OUR CHILDREN WILL THANK US!!!! NO TIME TO WASTE!!!!!
This is EXACTLY what the anti abortion laws are designed to do: Turn citizens into nothing more than Government property. Cattle to be done with as the Government sees fit.
This is where I feel that protest should come in. Judges that make decisions that choose the Government and Big Business over the citizen need to have protests mounted in front of their homes. On their doorsteps. The problem is that they sit up on their bench, looking down through rose colored glasses passing edicts upon "The Common Person." with absolutely NO consequence to them. they can completely defy the Constitution without penalty. This needs to change. A thousand angry protesters at her door sounds right to me.
Gale: WAW, I think your statement and references are way above the comprehension of the anti-abortion groups. Because they're reacting to the teachings of religious pushers and in no way would they quote these passages, it would put them out off business.
login to add your comment
use your care2 login
add your comment