START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

73% of Voters Want an LGBT Non-Discrimination Order

73% of Voters Want an LGBT Non-Discrimination Order

 

An overwhelming majority of likely voters support President Obama signing an executive order banning federal contractors from anti-LGBT discrimination.

Reports the Human Rights Campaign:

A new poll put out by HRC shows overwhelming support for this kind of executive order. 73 percent of 2012 likely voters favor such an order and support remains strong regardless of age, race, education, political ideology, and a number of other demographics.

When asked: “As you may know, under current federal law and in many states, gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people are NOT protected from discrimination in the work place. Would you support or oppose a policy that required companies that do business with the federal government to not discriminate against gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender people in employment?” 73 percent said they supported the policy, 9 percent opposed the policy and 9 percent were unsure.

The poll showed that the breadth of support crossed religious, racial and economic lines, as well as crossing barriers like age and level of education.

Among self-identifying Democrats 86% favor the move, only 10% oppose; 70% of Independents are in favor while 22% oppose; and 61% of Republicans approve while 22% oppose, though Republicans had the largest “Don’t Know” response at 15% compared to 4% and 9% for Democrats and Independents respectively.

In terms of gender, 70% of men favor the move compared to 75% of women.

In terms of level of education, college educated and non-college educated support was the same at 73% approval and 18% against.

Age divides show a surprising blip in usual trends, actually demonstrating that support among 18-29 year-olds at 69% is lower than among the 65+ category who came out strongly in favor at 75%. The youngest age bracket also had the highest level of opposition at 27%.

In terms of race and ethnicity divides, support for a nondiscrimination executive order among white voters polled at 72%. This compares to 80% among black voters, and 72% among Hispanic voters.

Where religious divides are concerned, those with no religion whatsoever were most likely to support the order at 85%. However, support was very high across the board, with 68% of Protestants, 77% Catholics, 64% of Born Again Christians, and 77% of Christians not identifying as “born again” allsupportingthe measure.

In terms of support based on housing environment, 76% of big city residents supported the move while 73% of rural residents were in favor. Among suburban voters support was strong at 76% and they had the lowest score of opposition (11% compared to 18% for both big city and rural residents), though they also had the highest indecision at 13%.

The poll did throw some light on one key problem: that many voters were unaware that federal law does not already bandiscriminationon grounds of sexual orientation. A staggering 87 percent thought that current law already protected people from being fired solely because they are gay.

The national survey of 800 likely voters was conducted for HRC by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research from November 9 13, 2011, and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.46 percentage points.

Precedent for this kind of executive order comes from the Johnson administration which created a standing provision that government contractors are barred from discriminating on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

This order would not be suitable as a replacement for Congressional action like passing the Employment Non Discrimination Act (ENDA) as it would not roll out national coverage and would only apply to federal contractors, but it would be a benchmark-setting interim measure.

The Obama administration has been rumored to have the order pending with the Justice Department having cleared it as both lawful and viable.

This has left advocates wondering what precisely the Obama administration is waiting for.

 

Related Reading:

Trans Woman Sues For Alleged Police Harassment

Trans Protections Next in Maryland?

NBA Adds Sexual Orientation Protections


Read more: , , , , , , ,

Image used under the Creative Commons Attribution License with thanks to Highways Agency.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

16 comments

+ add your own
10:55PM PDT on Apr 6, 2012

To Nadine H. - Yes, I agree, the government does what they want to do, but that's because they have forgotten the truth and we have allowed it.

WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT. Don't ever forget, we put them there and we can get them out. It starts with a vote. Add yours to mine and his and hers... and suddenly the politicians are listening. Too often they depend on voter apathy, hoping they've lost our attention completely in the midst of all their shouting, so they can get back to running things exactly the way they want to without the interference of their bosses - the voters.

10:20PM PDT on Apr 4, 2012

I agree with Robert O.

" The time is now! Discrimination must end and equality for all must prevail!"

8:27PM PDT on Apr 4, 2012

-- Marianne C. -- You are quite right. And right-wing Pols will stand up and say, with all conviction, "the American People oppose the very idea of the Government dictating to Business who it must employ" when, in fact, the American People are saying the exact opposite, and are demanding fairness for everyone in the workplace, especially if that workplace is funded with public money.

And about the resistance to this measure shown by younger voters. Could it be that younger people have not yet had the time to develop confidence in their own sexuality?

1:12PM PDT on Apr 4, 2012

You can bet that even though support outweighs opposition by either 2-1 or 3-1 in every category polled, the opposition will still clamor and demand that THEIR position be the one the rest of us have to live with. They do it again and again, invariably trying to claim moral high ground to which we own the deed.

12:09PM PDT on Apr 4, 2012

when will you people wake up? the government does what they want to do!

11:40AM PDT on Apr 4, 2012

In 2012 I can not believe that this is still an issue. Grow up people and let everyone live their own life as long as they are not hurting others.

11:08AM PDT on Apr 4, 2012

Glad to hear this.

"Nations will rise and fall, but equality remains the ideal. The universal aim is to achieve respect for the entire human race, not just for the dominant few."
------------------Carlos P. Romulo, Filipino diplomat, journalist and author, and former president of the UN General Assembly

11:07AM PDT on Apr 4, 2012

The time is now! Discrimination must end and equality for all must prevail!

10:42AM PDT on Apr 4, 2012

This is awesome! It amazes me how people are finally starting to see that church/religion should have absolutely no barriers on sexual orientation nor on the rights we receive. So much for organized religion and propagated ant-gay organizations such as NOM and DOMA being able to actually facilitated a two-tiered society! Looks like that strategy is all washed up!

10:21AM PDT on Apr 4, 2012

Let's hope this moves forward. It's way past due !!!!

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

If you'd like to help Karen and Jean-Roger save even more animals from poachers and other calamities,…

Poor Arturo he needs to be somewhere it is cold, not burning up.

I am glad he was given 10 plus years for his crime . We need more judges like Judge Verdin! Also I am…

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.