START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
1,800,451 people care about Politics

A 99% White Party is Bad for Republicans – and for America

  • 2 of 2

In this year’s Republican primaries, even states with the largest black populations have registered only 1 to 2 percent black voter participation. And despite the GOP’s hope that it could peel away minority voters who agree with them on social issues, Barack Obama enjoys approval ratings in the high 80s among black voters and retains strong support from Latinos when matched up against his Republican rivals.

Yet the conservative base seems stubbornly resistant to change, and to quote Donald Rumsfeld, you go to war with the army you have, not the army you wish you had. Thus, even many moderate and mainstream conservatives are forced to politely clear their throats and look away from all but the most egregious examples of racism among their allies. Without them, they wouldn’t have the votes to win elections.

The right is clearly sensitive to this issue, or it wouldn’t be so bashful when the Derbyshires of the world let their fig leaves drop. But instead of addressing these internal tensions, it tries to turn the tables by accusing progressives of “playing the race card” (i.e. mentioning that racism exists). As Alex Pareene wryly noted, many conservatives seem to operate under the assumption that “accusations of racism are the new racism, and said accusations are invariably politically motivated.”

This tendency has been on full display in the case of Trayvon Martin, from labeling President Obama a “race hustler” for extending his sympathies to Martin’s family to the Free-Beacon’s blunt headline, “Registered Dem Killed Trayvon.” Sure, George Zimmerman shot a 17-year-old boy to death, but the real question on everyone’s mind was who he voted for.

While these attempts to turn racism into a partisan issue might help to assuage some guilty consciences, the results are ultimately bad for both conservatives themselves and the country as a whole. The need to keep the racist fringe mollified means that once Republicans are in power, they inevitably set to work implementing discriminatory and divisive laws like the ones mentioned above – even, as my colleagues Bryce Covert and Mike Konczal have pointed out, when their electoral sales pitch is based on promises of fiscal discipline and economic recovery.

This also has consequences for their attempts to broaden their base. It’s no shock that outreach toward Latinos has failed when 91 percent of them want progressive immigration reform like the DREAM Act yet it can barely garner single-digit support among congressional Republicans. And on a broader level, it’s impossible to seriously discuss or redress racial inequality and injustice if someone keeps changing the subject.

Some progressives might be tempted to say, “So what? Aren’t we trying to discredit conservatives anyway? Let’s just sit back and watch the train wreck.” But in truth, the inability of the conservative movement to escape the racist albatross around its neck is bad for progressives, too. If we’re to be measured by the quality of our opponents, what does it say about us if we win because the other guys got caught e-mailing each other Photoshops of Barack Obama as a witch doctor with a bone through his nose?

There’s no reason for progressives to push ourselves to strengthen our arguments or develop bold new solutions to seemingly intractable problems unless there’s an equally powerful, credible, and clear-minded counter-force. Besides, in a two-party system, the other side is going to take the reins of power at least some of the time. When that happens, we want them to be people we can debate in good faith.

This sad state of affairs wasn’t inevitable. For a brief moment, Barack Obama’s victory in 2008 seemed to signal a sea change in America’s eternally fraught racial politics. The last, greatest barrier had been surmounted and a new generation, unburdened by the prejudices of the past, had risen to power, ready to tackle the big issues and debate the questions that really mattered. But the idea of Obama being a “post-racial” president soon degenerated into a punch line as many Republicans, terrified of the new president’s broad appeal, gave in to their darkest impulses.

The most high-profile and embarrassing of these efforts was the attempt to cast doubt on Obama’s birth records, which culminated with Donald Trump beclowning himself by basing his entire presidential campaign around an easily debunked conspiracy theory. (Oddly, Trump was not asked to produce any documentation to explain what part of the planet Earth produces vividly orange people with gossamer hair.) Instead of putting the last nail in racism’s coffin, Obama’s historic triumph brought the cranks out of the woodwork, spooked by a premonition of their demise.

But all hope is not lost just because some conservatives continue to write clueless op-eds about how white privilege doesn’t exist because someone who may or may not have been black may or may not have stolen a bike. Even if electoral concerns make the right hesitant to repudiate and cut ties with its more retrograde allies for now, it remains a demographic reality, as Jonathan Chait has written, that the current conservative coalition must either change or die – and conservatives are nothing if not resilient. And if conservatives do manage to join the 21st century and start winning over minority groups, it will mean that elected Democrats will actually have to start working for their votes again.

As Bryce Covert has written, “once we find ways to get our representatives to truly represent the diversity of our people, more Sarah Palins and Herman Cains will be a good sign. Progressives won’t have to vote for them, but we’ll know that they come with the territory of greater equality.” Once that happens, and once conservatives start proactively challenging racism in their ranks instead of shouting “I’m rubber; you’re glue!” when called on it, maybe we can finally have an adult conversation about race and move forward as a united country.

This post was originally published by the Roosevelt Institute.


Related Stories:

Sheriff Joe Can’t Let the Crazy Go

George Zimmerman Proves Latinos Can Be Racist, Too

“Don’t Re-Nig 2012″ Bumper Sticker Creator Swears It’s Not Racist


  • 2 of 2

Read more: , , , ,

Photo from escapedtowisconsin via flickr

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
11:46AM PDT on Apr 16, 2012

"Republicans risk political extinction if they can’t refurbish their image and adapt their policies accordingly."

That would be just WONDERFUL! and, THE SOONER THE BETTER. Can't be TOO soon!

Republican Political Extinction -- YAY!
THEN, the DEMOCRATS would be our right-wing party -- similar to Centrist parties in Europe.
We could THEN have a REAL Party on the Left -- representing Women, Young People, various Ethnicities, LGBTQ people, the better-educated, etc. {yes, I'm a SNOB and FOR good education!} -- something like the Greens started out to be, or some of the people coming from the Occupy movement. {These voters now vote for the Dems, by DEFAULT -- they often SAY, "It's just the lesser of two evils!"}
Repubs then would be a minor, unimportant third-party for Creationists, the Sexually-repressed {including repressed Gays}, Haters, Fascists, Misogynists, Lunatics, and assorted Reactionary Cranks.....

11:26AM PDT on Apr 16, 2012

We never said ALL women are smart. Just the ones that are going away from the republican party as fast as they can, in ever growing numbers.

Paul thinks the left are "friggin nuts", but he thinks the republican party cares about him. Now how friggin nuts is that?

11:04PM PDT on Apr 15, 2012

If you are Republican, then you are a liar, a bigot, a woman hater, anti-choice, a war monger.
That is their agenda and if you vote for them they will DO that, whether you like it or not.
It doesn't matter if you like gays or women, THEY don't and THEY are the only ones that
COUNT because THEY have POWER and you don't. So if you are Republican you support
WARS STARTED BY THEM! The most loving response I can come up with for you is

10:23PM PDT on Apr 15, 2012

How, HOW can anyone vote for these "people"

6:26PM PDT on Apr 15, 2012

unfortunately... it is the Republicans 'out here' that PUT those Republicans 'up there' IN DC... into positions of power (Congress, White House, etc).

1:18PM PDT on Apr 15, 2012

These are extremists - dangerous, selfish, racist, slime, and just plain wrong! WE can't let them win! I like that - Republicans are Slytherin!

12:16PM PDT on Apr 15, 2012

While I agree that the rabid right's ideas are based on fear and the Repugnican party has had anti-woman policies, I do believe it is true that our country would benefit if both parties were anti-racist, as well as pro-choice and pro-gay rights.

9:30AM PDT on Apr 15, 2012

pure conservatism is a mental defect/disease based on FEAR

8:06AM PDT on Apr 15, 2012

“the Republican strategy is basically to be a white party and a white southern party." I think this statement pretty much covers the Republican party of 'no'.

7:38AM PDT on Apr 15, 2012

I think about the fine American people I've met on Care2 and elsewhere, I look at the younger generation, and I have hope.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Heather, the mouse poisons are restricted to the inside of the shed, is used to protect the equipment…

meet our writers

Beth Buczynski Beth is a freelance writer and editor living in the Rocky Mountain West. So far, Beth has lived in... more
ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.