An Epidemic of Shootings by Toddlers

Toddlers should be playing with flowers and other harmless objects, but recently, at least six picked up guns instead, with tragic consequences. Unsecured firearms are a significant health and safety risk, and young children account for the majority of such accidents at home because they often don’t understand what they are playing with. As the nation ignites with debate over gun control, these cases illustrate the critical need for a rational discussion on how to manage guns responsibly while ensuring public safety.

In Tennessee, Josephine G. Fanning died after being shot by a four-year-old child when he gained access to a gun that was set down just for a moment: by a law enforcement officer, no less. Sheriff’s Deputy Daniel Fanning unlocked a gun case to show a rifle to a guest at a cookout, removing a handgun in the process, and the child picked it up, firing a single fatal round. While the death is being treated as an accident, it’s a stark reminder that even law enforcement officers with extensive training can make unwise decisions when it comes to handling firearms.

In South Carolina, a three-year-old is dead from a self-inflicted gunshot would. Few details about the case are available, but the child apparently found the gun and pulled the trigger, suggesting that it was lying in an area accessible to children, and had been left both loaded and unlocked.

In Alabama, another four-year-old shot himself after finding an unsecured and unlocked handgun. The revolver was in a household belonging to someone who cannot legally own firearms due to previous violent criminal convictions.

In New Jersey, a four-year-old boy shot and killed a six-year-old playmate with a rifle that “accidentally discharged.” The specifics of where the rifle was and why it was left unsecured are not clear.

In Tennessee, a mother survived an abdominal wound after her two-year-old shot her with a handgun found under her pillow. She was asleep with her new baby at the time, making it remarkable that this case didn’t turn into a double tragedy.

In Georgia, another thankfully non-fatal tale, of a toddler who found an unsecured gun under a bed and shot himself in the thumb.

These cases are being used as a compelling argument for more extensive gun control in the United States, on the ground that we shouldn’t have to fear an epidemic of armed toddlers. But they’re also an argument for cracking down on responsible gun ownership.

They all involved situations in which potentially lethal weapons were left loaded, unlocked and unsecured in an area where they could be reached by a young child. In at least one case, the gun owner had sufficient training and experience to know better when it comes to appropriate gun handling and storage, yet thought it would be okay “just for a minute” to go against protocol.

In a nation with a deeply-embedded gun culture, it’s critical not just to discuss ways to keep guns from falling into the wrong hands, but also to talk about how to foster responsible, mature gun ownership. Unfortunately, the people most likely to pursue legal avenues including licensing, safety classes and refresher courses on gun safety are also those most likely to use guns responsibly, while criminals will continue to accrue weapons via illegal means, and store them unsafely.

Can the United States reform, and balance, its gun culture to protect the safety of children and members of the general public, or will extreme conservatives dominate the discussion about what nature these reforms will take?

Related posts:

Why Gun Control Legislation Will Likely Pass Supreme Court

Colorado is Winning at Gun Control

Regardless of Political Party, Women Support Gun Control

Photo credit: LeAnn


Kathy Perez
Kathy Johnson3 years ago


Terry V.
Terry V3 years ago

epidemic is exaggerated. and then some. 1 child or person is one too many.
Keep guns unloaded and locked away if you MUST own them

Julie Cook
Julie Cook3 years ago

Syd H; I know a gun is an inanimate object. However, it's sole purpose is to kill. In cases like the ones cited by the author, these were accidents waiting to happen. I agree with you that anyone who allows these accidents to happen should be barred from owning guns. That, however, is very unlikely, given the current state of NRA hysteria over their so-called "rights".

Syd Henley
Syd H3 years ago

Julie C.
Strictly speaking, the gun lobby would be absolutely correct in saying "Guns don't kill people".
As far as I am aware no gun as ever been capable of killing people in its own right. The gun is an inanimate object that is completely without a capability to think and operate independently. It requires someone (a human being) to load it with ammunition, take off the safety catch, point (aim) it and squeeze the trigger. Any death or injury from a bullet wound is therefore caused by a human being, not the gun itself.

Syd Henley
Syd H3 years ago

Julie C.

Teresa Wlosowicz
Teresa W3 years ago


Julie Cook
Julie Cook3 years ago

I'm waiting for the gun lobby's inane line--"Guns don't kill people" as a response to these senseless tragedies.

B Jackson
BJ J3 years ago

Sounds like these people shouldn't have kids or guns.

Syd Henley
Syd H3 years ago

These sort of tragic stories will continue to be seen, while ever unthinking, careless morons are allowed to own guns.
Anyone who has a so called ACCIDENT ??? with a fire arm, irrespective of whether a person is killed or injured, should automatically be barred from owning and using one for life.
Incidents where people are killed or injured, cannot happen if the gun is:
A. Unloaded after use.
B. Has the SAFETY CATCH on at all times when not being fired.
C. Has a removable trigger lock in place when not in immediate use.
D. Is in a secure, locked gun cabinet when not in use.
E. Is NEVER left anywhere that a child may gain access to it.

Magdika Cecilia Perez

thank you