START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
2,968,302 people care about Environment & Wildlife

Animal Rescues: Is it Ethical to Save One Animal and Eat Another?

Animal Rescues: Is it Ethical to Save One Animal and Eat Another?

Recently, a medical nonprofit decided to go vegan in order to adhere to their mission for health. Should animal rescue organizations also “practice what they preach” and stop serving meat at their events for ethical reasons?

Two animal sanctuaries definitely think so and are asking animal organizations, like rescues and humane organizations, to go vegan.

Nonprofit Goes Vegan for Health Reasons

As reported in The Washington Post, Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), a nonprofit office, decided to implement a new office policy stating that “only vegan food may be eaten in its office.” In an attempt to “practice what they preach,” the nonprofit, “which advocates for healthy eating, preventive medicine and ethical clinical research,” ditched the donuts for healthier vegan alternatives. However, the new policy doesn’t extend beyond the office.

PCRM took their new vegan practices, along with weekly instructions, over to Geico’s Chevy Chase headquarters. Over a 22-week period, Geico employee’s reported that they had “lost more weight, improved physical health and said they saw a decrease in food costs.”

Some Food for Thought

As reported in Cleveland, Gia Campola, an animal activist, explained, “There is never any recognition or discussion of the correlation between the grievous, merciless suffering of factory farmed animals and the suffering of cats and dogs.” Campola also added: “Why is one animal more deserving than the other? They are all equal, all sentient, all defenseless, and all need us to protect them.”

Animal Place, an established farm animal sanctuary, has its Food for Thought program. The program’s objective is “to help SPCAs, humane societies, and similar rescue organizations adopt an animal-friendly menu policy for their shelter-sponsored events.”

In the Animal Place press release, Kim Sturla, Animal Place’s executive director, explained that there is a “division” between saved and non-saved animals, and programs like Food for Thought “encourage shelters to see that farmed animals have the same value as companion animals.” Ironically, many of the rescue organizations also rescue percentages of farm animals (e.g., chickens, turkeys, goats and pigs).

Per Animal Place’s research, “29% of the humane societies and SPCAs (Societies for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) had a vegetarian-only policy for their sponsored events.” Animal Place also found that when they also considered animal control and similar entities that “the percentage of vegan and vegetarian policy-holding organizations was 18% of the total surveyed.” Some of the organizations consciously excluded fish, or pescatarian, options on ethical grounds.

Overall, Animal Place found that 78 percent of the organizations “already have in place an animal-friendly policy or are receptive to creating one.” This finding mirrors other polls where 85 percent of participants felt “it is ethically inconsistent for an animal shelter that rescues dogs, cats, rabbits, horses, goats, and other animals to sell or serve animal products at the shelter-sponsored fundraising events.”

Setting a Humane Standard

Rick Thompson, from PETA Prime, feels, “It is inconsistent and hypocritical for animal shelters and rescue groups to raise funds to help some animals by serving other animals as food.” He likens eating meat to buying a dog from a puppy mill. He also feels that animal rescue organizations should set educational examples.

For Thompson, creating a more humane standard also has monetary benefits. An ethical consumer is more likely to donate to an organization aligned with their moral compass. There can be a dissonance between help save this dog, but come eat this pig.

Can We Blame Animal Organizations?

I don’t think so. There’s a disconnect between food to fork across the board, and animal rescue workers aren’t immune; they are consumers, too. How many Americans do you think flinched, or even questioned, Jack in the Box’s #Bork (beef and pork) and #Moink (moo and oink) SuperBowl commercial? It’s safe to assume that most viewers laughed along with the commercial.

According to Pro Bono Australia, a Central Queensland University researcher from an animal welfare and consumer study found that, “Although consumers declare they are willing to pay more for welfare-friendly products, these intentions are not often translated into practice at the shops.” Yet there is evidence that consumers are more “willing to pay more for high-profile, easy take-home message products such as ‘Freedom Eggs.’” The 2013 study also found that while most Australian consumers say that the care about animal welfare, many are seeking more information.

The dynamic of personal autonomy, office culture, serving a target audience and serving the greater good is complex. Animal rescue and humane organizations often play a positive role; it is encouraging to see how many members within these organizations are open to more ethical and humane choices at their events. It’ll be interesting to see how, or if, these organizations evolve.

Read more: , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: Animal Allies Rescue Foundation

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
1:35AM PST on Feb 24, 2015

thanks for sharing :)

10:18AM PDT on Apr 22, 2014

The really difficult question, which Care2 never asks, is "Is it ethical to save an animal knowing that many other animals will have to be killed and fed to it?" Every time we save a cat or a dog - or a tiger or a wolf - we condemn dozens of herbivores which will have to be killed to keep the carnivore alive. Even when we put mealworms out for the birds, those are hundreds of little lives which we don't even think about, because we've decided that arthropods are less important than vertebrates.

Years ago, I saved an injured sparrowhawk and passed it on to the veterinary college in Edinburgh. They mended the bird's broken leg successfully, then a few days later they put him under again to fix his broken wing, and he died. Meanwhile several mice had been killed and fed to him - and I love mice. If I'd left that bird in the road to die it wouldn't have made any difference to the outcome for him, and the mice would have still been alive - yet could I have walked past and not saved him? There aren't any easy answers.

2:42AM PDT on Apr 3, 2014

I agree, Arnold, but I think you meant to say no matter how much she wants to claim she was designed to be, not deny she is/was. Green Star your way.

Angela, who told you that you "started out as a role model"? Are you related to Kim Kardashian or Paris Hilton or someone influential? The biggest role models that exist are our parents, and each of us can approach parenthood slightly differently and still be good parents. None of us enters this world as a vegetarian or a vegan, as much as they want to claim they were. Unless you were born with teeth and start chomping on carrots immediately after you were born, you were born to suckle MILK, either from your Mother or from a bottle of formula.

1:01PM PDT on Apr 2, 2014

Unfortunately, you are sadly mistaken, on several counts...

You are not designed as a "vegan" or "vegetarian", no matter how much you want to deny it. And the arrogance and ignorance of vegans and vegetarians is tantamount to religious nonsense... PLANTS are as alive, as feeling, as present as you or any other animal. The fact that you continue to live in absolute lack of awareness of this is KARMIC. There is a huge difference between desiring a peaceful planet on which ALL life is considered sacred, and treated with respect, and what you espouse... EAT CRUELTY FREE, YES !!!!! Subject me, or your cat or dog to your nonsense, NO !!!!

12:43PM PDT on Apr 2, 2014

Way back when I told people how much I love animals and one guy said that; you don't kill but you make someone to kill meat for you. In no time, I became vegetarian and I began to read more about anything that causes animals suffering, then I will ban that product right away. I'm pretty much vegan now except for those ready made product that has egg in them, like bread and pasta since I can't afford to buy vegan only. My point is we all start as an individual to be a role model, imagine that each one of us on this planet with a population of over 7 billions!!!!! is willing to make a sacrifice to change for the better for ALL other beings will make a significant impact on our environment and the lives of all beings. It's not just about healthy but mostly about kindness and compassion, therefore, people who are with animal shelters should really be a role model in order to have followers and it only make sense that ALL SENTIENT BEINGS are created equal in order to save them all, not just certain species.

7:39AM PDT on Mar 19, 2014

"And I get sick of hearing accusations of "vegan propaganda". You are exposed on a daily basis to meat, dairy, and egg propaganda (usually called "advertising"), almost from birth, and I don't hear complaining about carnist propaganda".............Danielle, surely you are smart enough to know the difference between propaganda and advertising. Propaganda is nonfactural for the most part and the purpose is to change others' minds on a topic or product. It is more likely to come from someone who has an agenda to influence others to be like they are and it may be religious, political or in this case, nutritional lifestyles. Advertising is PAID by a company to sell it's own products and/or services and they are bound to not say things that are absolutely untrue. You don't hear complaining about "carnist propaganda" probably because cats usually don't put out videos and pamphlets. Cats are true carnivores (I know the word carnist is meant to enflame us who are not vegan, and it's a made-up word). We don't advertise to try to convert non-vegans to start eating meat, so there is no need for such advertising. We DO try to refute vegan propaganda with facts, however.

7:22AM PDT on Mar 19, 2014

Re: Sandra Z. said, " And for anyone delusional enough to think that family farms are providing anything more than perhaps 2% of the meat out there, wake up. As for actually trying to see for yourself, good luck with that. " about 2 or 3 % of the world is trying to live on a vegan diet. So if only 2% of the meat is clean and humane...and that doesn't seem good enough to you, then why would anyone think that such a small number of vegans who still use animal by-products daily (from factory farms) are saving animals?

Those of us who buy directly from the farms know what we're eating...because we DO see for ourselves.

We should be working together to clean up factory farming practices instead of feeling smug and pointing fingers at people who have done the research and are doing more than just choosing a diet that isn't complete or nutritionally balanced.

4:31AM PDT on Mar 19, 2014

Sandra Z. said, " And for anyone delusional enough to think that family farms are providing anything more than perhaps 2% of the meat out there, wake up. It's all coming from those factory farms, worse than concentration camps, as anyone who has seen any undercover video can see for themselves. As for actually trying to see for yourself, good luck with that. Those places are locked up tighter than Fort Knox".........not remotely fair to say the word "all" in that context. Many of us have actually done our homework and we are not delusional at all. Those "undercover videos" you refer to are sometimes decades old, are edited and are little more than propaganda to suck in naïve and gullible people who think they're doing good by ranting just like you have. Farms which are not abusive, and there are many, not only are NOT 'all locked up" but encourage open tours. Instead of working so hard to insult those of us who have done our research and only patronize those places, you might do your own and go visit some of them.

2:15AM PDT on Mar 19, 2014

"People really care and go vegan or they do not give a damn and continue to eat animals. there is no in between here. You can tell a person's worth by how they treat animals"...........posted a week ago, but I just read it and I know it's been responded to..........however, I just want to say that it's very judgmental to say someone who is not vegan "doesn't give a damn", and yes, of course there is an "in between". Not all vegans do a thing FOR animals except not eat them. I know some pretty kind, caring and compassionate non-vegans and consider myself to be amongst them. On the other hand, judging by comments by some vegans in here, they are very much opposite of a kind, caring and compassionate human being..........not worth much at all.

8:56AM PDT on Mar 18, 2014

Karen B, you said, "Animals with canine teeth take down their living prey, and devour the hot, steamy internal organs, leaving the muscle for the scavengers. Why in the world would we need canines to eat our cooked meat that is usually so tender it melts in the mouth??????"..........I think I understand why you're posting this, even though it is a bit off the topic, but just an FYI, we are animals, same as a cat, dog, horse, lion, wildebeest, gorilla, whatever.......just a different animal species. We DO have "canine teeth" and if you doubt that, please feel free to ask your dentist. That is the name given to the two upper teeth, one on each side of the front 4 teeth, and they are shaped differently because they perform a different function. I just had my annual dental exam and clearly remember my dentist dictating to his assistant the names and numbers of various teeth and what he saw. He definitely referred to two of my teeth in the upper jaw as being "canines". As for what prey species go for, you're right in that the dominant predator, if in a pack may go for organ meat first, but the muscle is also devoured, and I guess you've just never watched a lioness start to feed when she and her sisters pull down their prey. Many times, she will start in on the hindquarters first, and maybe her sister that was in front, the one that suffocated the prey animal starts in on the neck or chest.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

How to we keep producing such monsters????

Oh, fer Chris'sakes!!! Bloviating bigoted racist idiots given oxygen by other bloviating racist bigoted…

Sandra D, I completely disagree with your ignorant post. To quote one of your comments in this lengthy…

meet our writers

Beth Buczynski Beth is a freelance writer and editor living in the Rocky Mountain West. So far, Beth has lived in... more
ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.