START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
3,439,330 people care about Animal Welfare

Ask Rhode Island Lawmakers to Protect ALL Pets from Mutilation

Ask Rhode Island Lawmakers to Protect ALL Pets from Mutilation

Lawmakers in Rhode Island recently introduced a bill that would prohibit landlords from requiring tenants to declaw or devocalize their pets because they believe these procedures are inhumane and potentially dangerous, but animal advocates are pushing for tougher laws to ban these procedures entirely.

Senate Majority Leader Dominick J. Ruggerio introduced the bill (2013-S 0177 ), which is based on a California law that prohibits landlords from requiring devocalization and declawing that was passed last fall. This bill would prohibit any person or corporation that occupies, owns, manages or provides services in connection with any property from requiring tenants to declaw or devocalize any animal allowed on the premises.

“These acts are inhumane for any animal to go through, unless there is a real medical necessity.  Imagine if your ability to talk or defend yourself was suddenly taken away from you. We must put an end to this,” said Senator Ruggerio.

He’s right. Both devocalization and declawing are inhumane and unnecessary and no one should resort to mutilating their pets to manage behavioral issues. Ever.

Devocalization involves a major surgery with a high risk of complications that uses either an oral approach, or a laryngotomy, that results in cutting or removing an animal’s vocal cords. Regardless of how it’s done, or who does it, this procedure can cause a host of other medical problems ranging from difficulty breathing and susceptibility to aspiration pneumonia to chronic gagging and death.

Once devocalized, dogs also lose their ability to communicate and socialize normally, which may cause frustration and lead to behavioral issues, along with making them potentially dangerous to people without their ability to give warnings when they’re upset.

Declawing involves a procedure that removes the last bone of each toe and is comparable to removing human fingertips. It leaves cats defenseless and can lead to chronic pain, in addition to causing other behavioral issues, such as biting and bypassing the litter box.

Despite arguments to the contrary, these procedures also still leave cats and dogs just as vulnerable to abandonment or euthanasia as any other pet. They do not guarantee pets a permanent home.

While animal advocates and organizations including the Coalition to Protect and Rescue Pets ― which led the successful campaign to ban devocalization in Massachusetts ― are grateful for the introduction of humane legislation, they are asking lawmakers to withdraw their bills and introduce legislation that will ban devocalization and declawing entirely with the argument that barring landlords from requiring these procedures won’t actually do anything to help keep pets safe and may hinder real protection laws in the future.

Their stance is that landlords aren’t the reason pets are forced to undergo these procedures – irresponsible and uneducated owners are. Worse even, if this legislation is passed, landlords will be allowed to sidestep this law by banning pets entirely, which could make it even harder for those of us with companion animals who rent to find a place to live.

Animal advocates would like to see legislation passed in Rhode Island like the law in Massachusetts, which bans devocalization of dogs and cats entirely, unless it is performed to relieve a physical ailment causing an animal harm and there are no other veterinary alternatives available.

TAKE ACTION!

Please sign and share the petition asking lawmakers in Rhode Island to withdraw their bills and instead introduce enforceable legislation that will protect all dogs and cats from devocalization and declawing.

 

Related Stories:

Tell the AVMA Devocalization is Mutilation

California Landlords Can’t Require Pet Mutilation

Is Montana the Worst State to Be a Dog?

 

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Photo credit: Thinkstock

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

198 comments

+ add your own
3:03AM PDT on Apr 24, 2013

thank you for sharing

10:19AM PDT on Apr 8, 2013

Signed.

8:22AM PDT on Apr 3, 2013

signed, thanks for sharing :)

3:00AM PDT on Mar 20, 2013

Petition gladly signed. Also there's another petition at
http://www.care2.com/causes/tell-the-avma-devocalization-is-mutilation.html
which is also well worth signing.
I would like to see all mutilation of animals banned, except for genuine medical reasons. It's cruel and unnatural. If a dog is barking excessively, one needs to look at its owners, home environment, exercise and training regime and address any problems, not just remove the symptoms.
The irony is, after campaigning against tail docking for twenty years, which thankfully is now banned where I live in Western Australia, I had to get one of my dogs docked for a serious medical condition. She is now much happier and healthier, but I have to be quick to explain to my animal rights friends when they first see her!

10:28AM PDT on Mar 11, 2013

Gladly signed and shared the petition.

2:49PM PST on Mar 9, 2013

Debarking and declawing should be BANNED everywhere.

7:48PM PST on Mar 8, 2013

This is Myraida from husbands comp. My is in the Dr.- This is Done & shared.
Law should protect dogs from landlords! Instead of asking for good behaviour from pets and make owners responsible, they simply do not accept families with pets! Related to devocalizing and declawing, veterinarians have at hand the recommendations of the OIE (World Org for Animal Health) Highest institution related to animals in the world. It's very clear there. And they also have the definition of the OIE for Welfare. One of the points that define Welfare is the possibility for animal to express INNATE BEHAVIOUR!

It's so difficult for dogs & cats to survive these days when there are too many vets! How are they going to work if they do not have clients? Their potential clients are dying in shelters! By the way, vet treatments are too expensive!!!!!!! How could people adopt and care for animals if they cannot pay for vet fees!!!!!! This is the worst time ever for animals!

7:15PM PST on Mar 8, 2013

already signed, thanks

6:45AM PST on Mar 8, 2013

signed

6:17PM PST on Mar 7, 2013

Signed , thanks

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches and writes about ancient Greek and Latin and is Online Advocacy and Marketing... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.