START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,189,693 people care about Politics

Background Checks for Gun Purchases Save Lives, Study Proves

Background Checks for Gun Purchases Save Lives, Study Proves

Gun control advocates and gun owners often disagree about what to do about the alarming rate of gun violence in our country. Amidst all the political back and forth, however, there is little disagreement about the desire to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. While no one tactic is absolute, background checks have proven to significantly reduce guns being sold to those who are deemed unfit to have them. Nearly 89 percent of Americans (and 84 percent of gun owners) support background checks for all gun sales.

A recent study shows what happens when background checks are not used.

In 2007, Missouri repealed its law that required licensing and a background check before purchasing a firearm. While federally licensed dealers were still required to perform background checks, private sales through unlicensed sellers no longer required them. In the aftermath, an average of 60 more people were killed by a firearm in every year since the repeal.

The study performed by the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (named in honor of former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg’s financial support) looked at murder data provided by the FBI, as well as death certificate data from the CDC. It was in the latter that showed the spike in firearm deaths, which had increased by 23 percent in Missouri from 2008-2012. The overall murder rate (from all sources) was down 5 percent in the United States overall.

While the data didn’t show a spike in murders in neighboring states, Illinois and Kansas both showed an increase in guns confiscated from criminals that had come from Missouri. In 2009, just two years after the repeal, Missouri ranked 37th in “crime guns” – a term used to describe firearms used in a crime after the original sale. Forty percent of Missouri’s guns are recovered in a crime within two years from the original sale.

The lead researcher on the John Hopkins study wrote that the study “provides compelling confirmation that weaknesses in firearm laws lead to deaths from gun violence. There is strong evidence to support the idea that the repeal of Missouri’s handgun purchaser licensing law contributed to dozens of additional murders in Missouri each year since the law was changed.”

In 2010, the Mayors Against Illegal Guns funded a project called Trace the Guns. The organization, founded in 2006 by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Boston Mayor Thomas Menino, is a bipartisan coalition of mayors from across the country focused on keeping illegal guns off the streets. The Trace the Guns project identified what laws were in place in each state and the rate of illegal guns that flowed in and out.

The states with the fewest gun laws on the books and those that did not require background checks ranked high for the number of crime guns originating from the state. The project identified ten key laws that had been proven to curb illegal gun tracking, including three relating to background checks. Only 15 states require individuals purchasing handguns from unlicensed sellers to pass background checks.

For the record, Missouri has only one of the ten laws — giving law enforcement discretion when issuing concealed carry permits.

The study’s authors point out, “Because many perpetrators of homicide have backgrounds that would prohibit them from possessing firearms under federal law, they seek out private sellers to acquire their weapons. Requiring a background check on all gun sales is a commonsense approach to reducing gun violence that does not infringe upon the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding gun owners.”

Read more: , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

184 comments

+ add your own
1:23PM PST on Mar 2, 2014

TYFS

6:03AM PST on Mar 1, 2014

I think that checks are good and perhaps families should be notified if a partner purchases a weapon.. as these people are the closest to these family members.. and they would be a good indicator of stability.. just my thoughts...

2:02AM PST on Mar 1, 2014

Nick A mentioned: "

"Bottom line, there is no level of governmental regulation of any arms which is constitutional or acceptable."

Fascinating and intriguing. Any arms? Perhaps a rocket launcher in every basement and a nuclear sub in every swimming pool. It certainly will put a new meaning into the words: 'Neighbourhood Watch.'

You are kidding, right? No governmental regulations at all? Talk about a wee too much Libertarianism. Citizens should be permitted to own military style assault weapons? No mandatory safety courses for gun owners?

So very true Roberta G when you state logically: "I repeat what so many sensible people here have already said: Why would any sane, intelligent, or law-abiding person object to a background check?"

Why indeed?

11:26PM PST on Feb 28, 2014

Interesting Mary B. You posted just before I did, so your comment was not yet visible to me.

Mary B, Wanda accused you of trying to shoot yourself? Bizarre, I know that you don't pack heat. I often have a healthy dose of skepticism when reading Wanda's comments, especially when it pertains to your health.

Someone not liking log cabins, Linda M? Log cabins and homes, especially located near a river are marvellous and lovely homes. There is nothing demented about you at all. Just the right wing attitudes that any form of gun legislation is somehow aimed at reducing their 'right to bear arms.' (Or legs or whatever other part of the human anatomy gets shot off when someone uses their weapon).

10:20PM PST on Feb 28, 2014

and how clever to have the finger salute. Very Mature.

10:20PM PST on Feb 28, 2014

HOw much you wanna bet Nick is Gary?????? Just joined today and jsut happened to find this post and this post alone???

9:18PM PST on Feb 28, 2014

Gary L, if you are going to accuse someone else of being a 'loser,' can you at least kindly spell the word correctly.

Are you that desperate for butterfly points that you need to post three of the same comment in a row?

I did not know that posts could reek, do posts eat garlic or Durian fruit by any chance?

9:07PM PST on Feb 28, 2014

Gary L.... who seems to have joined just today......If you're going to slander someone at least get the spelling right (and you did it 4 times)...... Loose and Lose are not interchangeable.....If you are implying that Cletus is "loose" that's one thing......to "lose" would be like you....

8:13PM PST on Feb 28, 2014

Cletus...you loose simply because you are a LOOSER. Your posts reek to that fact.

8:13PM PST on Feb 28, 2014

Cletus...you loose simply because you are a LOOSER. Your posts reek to that fact.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.