START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
571,476 people care about Real Food

Big Food Gets Punched by Health Site

Big Food Gets Punched by Health Site
  • 1 of 2

Big Food is taking it on the chin in a series on the PLoS (Public Library of Science) Medicine site. The editors have decided it is time to put the food industry under the health microscope.

The PloS “Big Food” series is presenting seven articles examining the food and beverage industry’s impact on health. Guest editors for the series are Marion Nestle of New York University and David Stuckler of Cambridge University.

Nestle, a long-time critic of the industrialized food system, recently wrote, “It’s hard to believe how thoroughly Congress is in bed with the food industry.” Stuckler is a social epidemiologist who has looked at the impact of economic stresses on public health.

Describing their rationale for taking on Big Food, the PLoS Medicine editors write:

Foremost, large food and beverage companies now have an undeniably influential presence on the global health stage. Whether it’s food company executives providing expertise at major conferences and high-level UN meetings or major global health funders lecturing on what nongovernmental organizations can learn from Coca-Cola, the perspectives and experiences of Big Food are shaping the field of global health. At the same time that their expertise is elevated in global health debates, food companies are rebranding themselves as “nutrition companies,” offering business acumen and knowledge in food science and distribution, and asserting authority over solutions to problems not just of food production but of malnutrition, obesity, and even poverty. The legitimization of food companies as global health experts is further fueled by the growing number of private-public partnerships with public health organizations, ostensibly designed to foster collaborative action to improve people’s health and wellbeing. And yet food companies’ primary obligation is to drive profit by selling food. Why does the global health community find this acceptable and how do these conflicts of interest play out?

Next: Time to Put Big Food in the Hot Seat

  • 1 of 2

Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Photo credits: Thinkstock

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

41 comments

+ add your own
8:24AM PDT on Jul 31, 2012

Big food = big profit = big troubles health wise! One can never really trust them!

5:14AM PDT on Jul 15, 2012

Make and eat your own product.

11:24AM PDT on Jun 29, 2012

marvelous news--

10:37AM PDT on Jun 29, 2012

thanks

10:17AM PDT on Jun 29, 2012

thanks

7:23AM PDT on Jun 29, 2012

You're right Mike C - hell it used to be a free country to own slaves in too, right? Unless you were a slave, that is - then it didn't feel so free.

The point is people don't HAVE a lot of choices. If you don't want to eat meat with pink slime in it, well how do you know how to select it? Other than buying organic, which is often twice as expensive, you have no other choice but to dig in and enjoy that pink slime. And it's only there because it increases profits. We are either not informed at all about what's in our food, or deliberately misinformed.

If you want to buy non GMO foods - well other than buying organic soybean products or organic corn products, YOU HAVE NO CHOICE BECAUSE IT'S NOT LABELED!!!!! And if you think it's easy to avoid non-organic corn, take a look at the ingredients label of about 3/4 of what's in your grocery cart. Corn syrup is in EVERYTHING. And if it's not organic, it's almost certainly GMO.

So yeah - I would LOVE for it to be a free country where people could make their own choices. But that's not what Big Ag and Big Food want - they want us to be pinned in a corner where we don't get the information we want to make choices, and the choices offered to us are tightly controlled so Big Ag and Big Food can continue to make Big Money on low quality food.

6:47AM PDT on Jun 29, 2012

why can't people make choices, people are responsible for what they eat.

Good old liberals taking away another freedom. Hey liberals, it use to be a free country, free to eat and drink what we want or not. It's the people's choice.

5:36AM PDT on Jun 29, 2012

I believe there are many people eating substandard food-like products because they are government subsidized to keep them cheap. What would consumers say if the subsidies were offered to local farmers who offered whole foods?

5:34AM PDT on Jun 29, 2012

One day my boss was eating a cone of the latest frozen dessert. I asked him what it was. He said, "Plastic!"

3:19AM PDT on Jun 29, 2012

Thanks for posting.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches and writes about ancient Greek and Latin and is Online Advocacy and Marketing... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.