Notice! Care2 will go offline for site maintenance July 28 at 9pm PST. Thanks
START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,269,838 people care about Politics

BREAKING: 1st Circuit Declares DOMA Unconstitutional

BREAKING: 1st Circuit Declares DOMA Unconstitutional

The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston ruled this morning that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) denies a host of federal benefits to gay married couples and is therefore unconstitutional. The decision is not only a win for equal rights advocates, but a near dare to the Roberts Court to take up the matter sooner rather than later.

The appeals court agreed with a lower court judge who rule in 2012 that the law is unconstitutional because it interferes with the rights of states to define marriage and also because it denies married gay couples federal benefits given to heterosexual married couples, including the ability to file joint tax returns.

It also forces states to comport other programs–like Medicaid assistance for example–to meet DOMA requirements or risk federal funding.

The ruling ups the ante on Supreme Court review of the controversial law, especially in light of conservatives doubling down on DOMA as a campaign point and the Obama administration’s position that the Department of Justice would no longer defend the constitutionality of the law. The opinion notes the fact that the statute was passed with minimal hearings and lacks formal findings in support of the need for the statute–two things courts often turn to in interpreting federal laws and determining the boundary where federal action must stop and state action can begin. It’s a signal the court is suspicious at best of the overall legitimacy of the statute to begin with and that, given the nature of the discriminatory impact of DOMA, a reason not to employ the extreme deference federal courts normally show economic legislation.

It’s an important albeit wonky distinction that appears directed right at the Roberts Court. Had the 1st Circuit grounded its analysis in traditional suspect-class categorization that equal protection challenges normally require the Roberts Court could easily seize on that decision as its basis of review and arguably overturn the 1st Circuit with very little controversy after decades of conservatives successfully watering down equal protection jurisprudence.

But instead the appellate court refuses the bait and relied on the line of cases following Romer that requires the government show more than a minimum justification in singling out a specific minority group for differential economic treatment. Because Congress failed to memorialize the need for discriminating against same-sex couples in the delivery of federal benefits the statute fails.

Your move, Chief Justice.

Related Stories:

Watch Gay Military Cadets Graduate [Video]

New Campaign Highlights How DOMA Hurts Military Families

DOJ Will Not Defend Anti-Gay Block On Military Benefits

Read more: , , , , ,

Photo from colindunn via flickr.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

37 comments

+ add your own
1:28PM PST on Mar 4, 2013

such good comments for the most part. Because I have a gay son and understood that sexual orientation is but a small part of a person and I thought he should have equal rights with my straight children I worked my tail off in the 80's and 90's for gay rights. I now think we are over the tipping point, and it is because gay folk have come out and we know them as no better or worse than straight people. It is amazing to see how fast this has happened. Now I'm on to trying to mitigate climate change!! Let's work to limit CO2!

6:13PM PDT on Jun 11, 2012

It seems sensible that our law requires the government show more than a minimum justification in singling out a specific minority group for differential economic treatmen

6:13PM PDT on Jun 11, 2012

It seems sensible that our law requires the government show more than a minimum justification in singling out a specific minority group for differential economic treatmen

8:03PM PDT on Jun 4, 2012

Noted

9:59AM PDT on Jun 2, 2012

Again, it is our CONSTITUTIONAL Right to have the same rights under the constitution!

Sexual orientation has NOTHING to do with any of our Constitutional Rights, as a population.

7:32PM PDT on Jun 1, 2012

It is about time that the DOMA Act that denies gay and lesbian couples equal rights under teh law was found to be unconstitutional. Whether or not the Robert's Supreme Court will weigh in on the decision is yet to be determined. Considering the repercussions of their disatrous Citizens United decision maybe they will not address it.

3:17PM PDT on Jun 1, 2012

noted

2:13PM PDT on Jun 1, 2012

Finally!!! Thank (enter whatever is appropriate) for the government actually working!!

1:29PM PDT on Jun 1, 2012

Absolutely awesome and wise decsion!

11:15AM PDT on Jun 1, 2012

It's about time!! Repeal DOMA!!!

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.