BREAKING: 1st Circuit Declares DOMA Unconstitutional

The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston ruled this morning that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) denies a host of federal benefits to gay married couples and is therefore unconstitutional. The decision is not only a win for equal rights advocates, but a near dare to the Roberts Court to take up the matter sooner rather than later.

The appeals court agreed with a lower court judge who rule in 2012 that the law is unconstitutional because it interferes with the rights of states to define marriage and also because it denies married gay couples federal benefits given to heterosexual married couples, including the ability to file joint tax returns.

It also forces states to comport other programs–like Medicaid assistance for example–to meet DOMA requirements or risk federal funding.

The ruling ups the ante on Supreme Court review of the controversial law, especially in light of conservatives doubling down on DOMA as a campaign point and the Obama administration’s position that the Department of Justice would no longer defend the constitutionality of the law. The opinion notes the fact that the statute was passed with minimal hearings and lacks formal findings in support of the need for the statute–two things courts often turn to in interpreting federal laws and determining the boundary where federal action must stop and state action can begin. It’s a signal the court is suspicious at best of the overall legitimacy of the statute to begin with and that, given the nature of the discriminatory impact of DOMA, a reason not to employ the extreme deference federal courts normally show economic legislation.

It’s an important albeit wonky distinction that appears directed right at the Roberts Court. Had the 1st Circuit grounded its analysis in traditional suspect-class categorization that equal protection challenges normally require the Roberts Court could easily seize on that decision as its basis of review and arguably overturn the 1st Circuit with very little controversy after decades of conservatives successfully watering down equal protection jurisprudence.

But instead the appellate court refuses the bait and relied on the line of cases following Romer that requires the government show more than a minimum justification in singling out a specific minority group for differential economic treatment. Because Congress failed to memorialize the need for discriminating against same-sex couples in the delivery of federal benefits the statute fails.

Your move, Chief Justice.

Related Stories:

Watch Gay Military Cadets Graduate [Video]

New Campaign Highlights How DOMA Hurts Military Families

DOJ Will Not Defend Anti-Gay Block On Military Benefits

Photo from colindunn via flickr.

39 comments

Jane H.
Jane H.3 years ago

such good comments for the most part. Because I have a gay son and understood that sexual orientation is but a small part of a person and I thought he should have equal rights with my straight children I worked my tail off in the 80's and 90's for gay rights. I now think we are over the tipping point, and it is because gay folk have come out and we know them as no better or worse than straight people. It is amazing to see how fast this has happened. Now I'm on to trying to mitigate climate change!! Let's work to limit CO2!

Anne F.
Anne F.4 years ago

It seems sensible that our law requires the government show more than a minimum justification in singling out a specific minority group for differential economic treatmen

Anne F.
Anne F.4 years ago

It seems sensible that our law requires the government show more than a minimum justification in singling out a specific minority group for differential economic treatmen

KELLY ROGERS
Kelly Rogers4 years ago

Noted

Anita Wisch
Anita Wisch4 years ago

Again, it is our CONSTITUTIONAL Right to have the same rights under the constitution!

Sexual orientation has NOTHING to do with any of our Constitutional Rights, as a population.

Carl Oerke
Carl O.4 years ago

It is about time that the DOMA Act that denies gay and lesbian couples equal rights under teh law was found to be unconstitutional. Whether or not the Robert's Supreme Court will weigh in on the decision is yet to be determined. Considering the repercussions of their disatrous Citizens United decision maybe they will not address it.

Judith H.
Judith H.4 years ago

noted

Sam Kroll
Samantha Kroll4 years ago

Finally!!! Thank (enter whatever is appropriate) for the government actually working!!

Gina P.
Regina P.4 years ago

Absolutely awesome and wise decsion!

Jennifer S.
Jennifer S.4 years ago

It's about time!! Repeal DOMA!!!