The budget that President Obama released on Monday makes cuts ($22 million each) in funding for the arts and humanities while increasing the budget for university research in areas such as renewable energy, wireless communications, and computer technology. While funding including Pell Grants to assist students from lower-income backgrounds is protected, the budget for career and technical education programs faces losing about 20% of its budget. These budget proposals stand in stark contrast to the Republican-controlled House’s calls for cuts in spending in education and research.
Cut to College Aid In Order To Preserve Pell Grants
Obama’s budget seels to keep the maximum Pell Grant at a total of $5550. To do so, cuts are proposed for, says the Chronicle of Higher Education, ‘in-school interest subsidy on loans to graduate students.’ Programs such as Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants and Federal Work-Study would be funded at the same level but a policy that allows students to receive two Pell Grants in a single year will end.
Currently, demand for Pell Grants is ‘skyrocketing,’ with 9.6. million students —up from 6 million in 2008—expected to receive a grant this year:
The economic downturn, coupled with recent increases in the maximum award, has severely strained the program, creating a shortfall that could reach $20-billion next year.
Congress created “year-round” Pell Grants in the last reauthorization of the Higher Education Act to help students earn degrees more quickly. The program went into effect only a year and a half ago.
On Monday, Obama said that the year-round Pell Grants had ‘”failed to demonstrate a meaningful impact on students’ academic progress.” Enrollment in summer courses for students with the grants only increased by 1 percent, according to the Education Department, plus the year-round grants cost 10 times more than the administration had anticipated.
Funding for Pell Grants is by no means assured, though. Republicans have introduced an appropriations bill that would reduce Pell Grants by $845 and get rid of 56 education programs, including Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants as well as several programs benefiting minority-serving institutions.
Other changes to funding for educational programs noted in Obama’s budget for Fiscal Year 2012 include:
Currently the Teach Grant program provides grants worth up to $4,000 to students who plan to work in a ‘high-need field’ after graduation; the proposed new program will provide winning states funds to award $10,000 scholarships to future teachers who attend “the most effective programs in the state.”
University Research Would Receive More Funds
Funding for university research will increased by 6.5% above FY 2010 levels, says the Chronicle of Higher Education:
Under the president’s proposal, the NIH [National Institutes of Health] would get $31.8-billion in fiscal 2012, up 2.4 percent from its fiscal-2010 levels. The NSF [National Science Foundation] would receive $7.8-billion, up 13 percent from 2010, while the Energy Department’s Office of Science would take in $5.4-billion, a 10.7-percent increase from 2010. The average increase for federal research expenditures is well above the nation’s 2.7-percent rate of inflation over the past two years……
The president’s proposal places emphasis on research in areas that include renewable energy, wireless communications, and computer technology. Scientists pursuing military applications also would benefit, with Mr. Obama seeking $2.1-billion in the Pentagon’s basic-research budget, up 14.5 percent from fiscal 2010. The few areas facing cuts in their research budgets under Mr. Obama’s proposal include the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Veterans Affairs.
The Obama administration faces stiff opposition to fund these increases. The House Appropriations Committee’s spending p lan for FY 2011 calls for cutting funds specifically to the NIH and the NSF:
The Republican proposal, expected to face votes this week in the House, would cut $60-billion governmentwide from fiscal-2010 levels. That proposed one-year cut includes $1.63-billion, or nearly 5.4 percent, from the National Institutes of Health, and $359.5-million, or 5.2 percent, from the National Science Foundation, according to the Association of American Universities.
The House committee’s proposed numbers would cut even deeper, and thus fall even farther from Mr. Obama’s goals, if applied now, with the 2011 fiscal year already more than one-third complete.
One difficulty in countering calls to cut university research is that it’s not always very easy to explain ‘connection between complicated research projects and the wide benefits they may provide to society.’ As James D. Savage, a professor of politics at the University of Virginia says, it is even harder to do so when ‘”when lawmakers such as Mr. [Eric I.] Cantor [the new majority leader in the House of Representatives and a Republican from Virgnia] compound the confusion by ridiculing “funny-sounding science projects.”‘
Indeed, data from the NSF reveals that funding for research and development on university campuses has fallen below inflation since the 2005 fiscal year, except for funds provided from the 2009 stimulus bill, which provided a one-time sum of $21.5-billion for research.
Obama has defended the increases in educational and research funding by arguing that we need to spend on these areas now to keep the US competitive in technology, innovation, and education with the rest of the world. With US students already lagging behind those in other nations including China, can we really afford not to put more resources in educating today’s students and funding research?
Previous Care2 coverage
Flickr by uhuru1701.
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.