Catholic Hospitals Split With Church Over Senate Abortion Provision

As those who have been following the congressional health care bill know, the Catholic Church has played a significant role, expressing its disapproval mostly over federal funding for coverage of abortion procedures.  The Church backed the House’s Stupak Amendment, which “bars a new government-run insurance plan from covering abortions, except in cases or rape, incest or the life of the mother being in danger, and prohibits any health plan that receives federal subsidies in a new insurance marketplace from offering abortion coverage,” and has expressed dismay at the new compromises over abortion in the Senate (ones which, ironically, pro-choice advocates are not happy with either).

From the New York Times, the new provisions allow “any state to bar the use of federal subsidies for insurance plans that cover abortion and requires insurers in other states to divide subsidy money into separate accounts so that only dollars from private premiums would be used to pay for abortions.”  This makes it difficult, bureaucratic, and certainly not desirable for insurance companies to cover abortions – but it still does not ban abortion coverage completely.

In a break with the bishops, who do not back the Senate’s compromise and have called it “morally unacceptable,” the Catholic Health Association has signaled that it may support the Senate’s version of the health care bill.  Days before the bill passed, the CHA said in a statement that it was “encouraged” and “increasingly confident” that such a compromise “can achieve the objective of no federal funding for abortion.” An umbrella group for nuns followed its lead.

The Catholic hospitals seem to be trying to find a way to support the health care bill, despite potentially objectionable abortion provisions, because they stand to gain significantly from a reduced number of uninsured patients.  Democrats seem encouraged by the CHA’s support of the bill, even though other abortion opponents (like our perpetual anti-choice favorite, Bart Stupak D-MI), said that the CHA’s influence was being overstated.

The Catholic Church has taken a number of controversial stands this fall, including a threat to cut off all support to the city of Washington, DC if the city legalized gay marriage.  And it has been a significant force in the health care debate – enough that many are hoping that this new split will help convince abortion opponents to accept the Senate compromises.

The sad thing is, the CHA is right – this new compromise will not make it easy or affordable for people to access insurance coverage of abortion.  To pro-choice advocates who see the right to an affordable and accessible abortion drifting away, this split within the church is almost irrelevant – but it could be the deciding factor in adapting the health care bill so that it is not as overtly anti-choice. 

And although many have accused the CHA of “selling out” to the Democrats, what they’re doing makes sense to me – as hospitals, their moral obligation is to help more people, and they can provide greater services if fewer of their patients were insured.  Catholic ethicist M. Cathleen Kaveny points out that the CHA could permit support for “imperfect legislation,” as long as one’s intent was not to “further abortion,” one made every effort to “minimize the harm,” and one achieved “an extremely important good that can’t be achieved any other way.”

What do you think?  Should the CHA split from the bishops on this issue?  Where does their moral obligation lie?  And what about pro-choice activists, who think that this bill shouldn’t pass in either form until the abortion restrictions are loosened?

Photo courtesy of Dustin and Jenae's Flickr Photostream.

Love This? Never Miss Another Story.

145 comments

trina firey
trina firey3 years ago

Lorna P.- YOU GO GIRL!!!
I say ALL YE SELF-SERVING BISHOPS & PRIESTS: STOP ACTING LIKE WHAT YOU THINK, FEEL, BELIEVE, SANCTIFY, SPEAK & DO ARE IMPORTANT!!! WE DON'T CARE---AT ALL!!!

Dont just threaten to take your money back from Washington,DC- PLEASE DO IT &
Then Get the HeLL Out of Here!!!
TEND TO YOUR MENTALLY CORRUPT & DISTURBED & TO YOUR FEMALE PHOBIAS

GET DOWN FROM YOUR SOAP BOXES FACE YOURSELVES HEAD ON- ADMIT IT:
"I'm controlling;I'm sexist; I'm a sex addict; I'm narcissistic; I'm greedy ; I'm more interested in power than Jesus; Gold pews are MORE IMPORTANT than Feeding the poor; we will fight to insure Pedophiles in the catholic church are immune from consequences; Catholicism supercedes democracy & rights of citizens; Catholics are to remain loyal accountable to the high powers and must never question the powerful & almighty male

Every sperm is to be cherished---including the pedophiles? The rapists? The catholic repeat sex offender brothers & bishops & priests ???
Just turn the other way & forget about it
PraiseBeTheWord of almighty catholic men


I

Leia P.
Leia P.6 years ago

catholicism is outdated.

Thomas S.
6 years ago

"The catholic church exists solely to serve the catholic church. "

The evidence behind that statement, please. All I've ever seen the church do is protect the church.

James Carpenter
Past Member 6 years ago

Stuart S. said......
"The catholic church exists solely to serve the catholic church. "
you are so right, think back to what they did after the 2nd world war, the hiding of paedophile priests, the killing of women in the dark ages, the lack of women at any level of the catholic church.
If they wish a input into this, the 1st thing they need to do is come into the world of today!

Teresa Mac Tavish

THANK YOU FOR THE POST

Stuart S.
Kevin David6 years ago

The catholic church exists solely to serve the catholic church. Politicians should not give credit to what it says other than via the electorate.
Remember it narrowly missed being labelled 'mafia' or a racketeer influenced organisation over the collusion to prevent justice for the paedophile priests.

These days it probably would be so labelled.

Marishka k.
Marishka k.6 years ago

as a woman, i feel it is your body and no one should have the right to tell you what to do with it, i do not think abortion should be a means of birth control

Leia P.
Leia P.6 years ago

screw the vatican

Pat Coloney
Patricia Coloney6 years ago

It all comes down to: Separation of church and state. Our government "employees", should
read the constitution. All government representatives are our employees. Church doctrine does not belong in government.

Lorna Paisley
Lorna Paisley6 years ago

I am Catholic and go to church about 49 Sundays a year.
I think the Church is run by a bunch of male chauvinist who are controlling and judgemental and care most about babies before they are born and then little after they are born.
I go to church to worship God and have little use for the Church heirarchy. They are like other governmental bodies.
They should get their nose out of politics and see to the poor and they can preach to the people about the sacredness of all life.