START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

Senators Urge Panetta To Help DADT Discharged Veterans

Senators Urge Panetta To Help DADT Discharged Veterans
  • 1 of 2


Senate lawmakers have written to the Secretary of Defense to ask that he streamline the process of removing DADT discharges from gay veterans’ records.

The Senators, Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Joe Lieberman (I-CT), and Mark Udall (D-CO), sent a letter to Leon Panetta this week asking that he expedite the formal process of having DADT discharges removed from veterans’ papers so that such discharges do not continue to hamper former soldiers’ employment prospects.

Says the letter:

The current process is protracted and overly burdensome for veterans who–according to Dr. Stanley’s guidance–should be entitled to have their discharge documents corrected. Our understanding is that many veterans who meet the criteria outlined above must first gather their service-related paperwork, which many veterans do not possess. The veteran must then file an application with the supporting documentation to overcome the presumption of the DRB that the discharge was proper. To accomplish this, the veteran must argue that the discharge should be changed according to the standards of “propriety” or “equity,” per DRB regulations. Only after overcoming this presumption will the DRB change the discharge paperwork.


We understand that changing discharge paperwork is not a small matter and that in most cases, a careful case-by-case evaluation is warranted. But as long as a former service member’s Narrative Reason for a discharge is “Homosexual Conduct,” “Homosexual Act” or “Homosexual Marriage,” that service member is compelled to be “out” to any future civilian employer and anyone else who sees the document. Likewise, the negative reentry code serves as a barrier to employment opportunities.

The letter goes on to stress that while the process of streamlining this procedural matter will be lengthy, it is important so that the military can fully leave behind the DADT rule that banned soldiers from open service.

The letter has been welcomed by LGBT rights groups.

Said Army Veteran and SLDN Executive Director Aubrey Sarvis in a statement:

“For many, making changes to discharge paperwork is a matter of dignity and restoring honor to their patriotic service in our armed forces. For others, it’s about qualifying for long overdue veteran’s benefits. But for others, a discharge from the military for sexual orientation can be a barrier to employment and requires veterans to ‘out’ themselves to future employers. It’s time to expedite this process to ensure that this discrimatory law doesn’t do further damage to our veterans and their families.”

A lawsuit is currently underway in which a veteran is challenging the federal Defense of Marriage Act for denying her same-sex spouse the benefits an opposite-sex spouse would have received. The President is not defending the law but the Republican House leadership is. You can read more on that here.

Click over to the next page to read the letter in full.

  • 1 of 2

Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Image used under the Creative Commons Attribution License with thanks to the US Army Photostream.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
1:12PM PDT on Apr 28, 2012

I hope he re-evaluates the decision, and does what is right.

1:25PM PDT on Apr 27, 2012


1:25PM PDT on Apr 27, 2012


7:26AM PDT on Apr 27, 2012

This is the very least the military could do after viciously destroying the careers of courageous men and women who risked their lives defending the country. These soldiers have a right to reinstatement with promotions and other compensatory benefits, and if the military wants to drag its heels on this, they will be sued and ordered by a court to pay those damages. It's precisely for these reasons that the 9th circuit was so wrong to vacate the lower court's ruling that DADT is unconstitutional; veterans are still suffering the injustice of this law, whether it remains on the books or not. This is pretty solid proof that the case was not "moot."

4:02AM PDT on Apr 27, 2012

To reverse the shame on the government for having such noted on a person's record ACT IMMEDIATELY.

10:46PM PDT on Apr 26, 2012

Panetta should have allready done it.

8:07PM PDT on Apr 26, 2012


4:21PM PDT on Apr 26, 2012

I hope Panetta get on the ball and starts the process soon. Thanks for the article Steve.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Thank you so much for sharing! Very good article!

Dystopian? I guess record crop yields, milder winters, and fewer cyclones is bad for those predicting…

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK


Civil Rights


Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights


Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!