START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
2,100,135 people care about Politics

The Final Debate: What Did We Think?

The Final Debate: What Did We Think?

OK.  The last Presidential Debate of 2012 is history.  What did it mean to Care2 members?  Did it change your mind, convince you you were supporting the right person or just irritate the heck out of you?  Share your thoughts here, in the comments.

Related stories:

The Biggest Foreign Policy Difference That Won’t Come Up in the Debates

Top 5 Things Mitt Suddenly Agrees With Obama About

10 Important Issues the Debates Are Ignoring



Read more: , , , , , ,

Image from

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
12:23PM PST on Nov 7, 2012

Yeah, nice try Droll R. It just so happens that those opinion pieces you claim them to be are sources that verify what they are talking about. Some were from independent blogs as you claim, but I have checked their sources unlike you. Secondly, they weren’t all from blog site opinion pieces as you claim and from sources certainly more credible than your preference for using satire sites as your substantiation.

No one has left out more pertinent facts than you have. And the racial agenda is and always has been your domain to a fault. Your messages have been the joke all along and have all been tasteless, bigoted and cheap. While most politicians lie to varying degrees, you present yourself as going above and beyond their behavior, as has your loser candidate.

10:03AM PST on Nov 7, 2012

Where's the 53 year old persian rug when you need him? Especially, when you want and deserve to walk on him for all of his loud mouthing. Looks like my psychological assessment of him was spot on.

He was right. Nate Silver got it wrong. Instead of Obama getting 313 EV's he only got 332!!!

9:29AM PST on Nov 7, 2012

Happy Day Everyone. Hope to see you in another discussion.

6:52AM PST on Nov 7, 2012

Really BIG crow!

6:49AM PST on Nov 7, 2012

It would appear our local trolls have a big serving of crow on their plate today. =)

6:23AM PST on Nov 7, 2012

It appears that even with all the attempts by Secretary of State Husted in Ohio with disenfranchising voters, the voters were even more determined not to allow another election to be corrupted.

8:24PM PST on Nov 6, 2012

Well then, it seems we have some celebrating to engage in this evening. Looks like the citizens of the US are in agreement with the citizens of the world in reelecting President Obama for another term. We don't even have the remainder of the western states results in and the President has already attained 270 electoral votes. Looks like Nate Silver was the man to follow in predicting this.

6:19AM PST on Nov 6, 2012

Del ~ Anytime government says they're going to "cut" spending on whatever programs they choose, jobs will be lost. The rest of us here know that as "governing", which is to say you can't please everyone and some sacrifices will be made. I see you pick your unemployment battles like a good Republican, as you're up-in-arms over defense cuts, but I don't see you making the same complaints over education cuts where teachers jobs are lost. Hell, Del, anytime government makes cuts in Medicare, environment, infrastructure and crime enforcement, there will always be a multitude of jobs lost. So, what is it with you ga' damn Republicans when it comes to military spending? Why is it ok, by you, for other cuts in government to happen, thus a loss of jobs to follow, but it's not supposed to happen with military cuts? For f**k sake Del, how gullible do you think we are?

4:19AM PST on Nov 6, 2012

Fresh off the wire from "The Hill"

This came from a friend. It has been on the news, but not too often. This means more unemployed and not carrying out the laws that other companies have to follow.

My son-in-law works at Lockheed Martin and we just found out that Lockheed is going to lay off 123,000 defense workers due to Obama's downsizing of the military. This hit the Drudge report yesterday. We are livid. This is true!

The law requires Lockheed to give 60-day notice to all to-be-fired employees within 60 days. That drop dead date would be November 1st.
Since this would be bad for the election, Obama has promised that our government would cover all Lockheed severance packages to fired employees if Lockheed would not release the names and locations of those losing their jobs until after the election!

Send this to all you know in Colorado since it will never show up in the Denver Post. This posting is from a defense contract newspaper called The Hill. Read details below:
Just wait and see the trickle down effect, re: employment.

If Ovomit is all about transparency then why is he pulling this crap? Is he worried about this election? Worried about making unemployment jump some more? Link inlcuded and above was a cut a paste from "The Hill".. Del R.

4:12AM PST on Nov 6, 2012

Teresa. ~~~Now go take your meds like a good boy. Get "Somantic"...your word, not mine...which probably means doubling up on your Soma.

which post are you in reference to ? The one where I questioned the inability to comprehend what under the influence means? Del R.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

The hippo looked like he was indeed playing, the crock, not so much...

ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!