START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,532,331 people care about Health Policy

Cell Phone Use Not Linked to Cancer, Says New Study

Cell Phone Use Not Linked to Cancer, Says New Study

A major study of 358,403 mobile phone users in Denmark has found no link between long-term cell phone use and tumors.  Previous studies about mobile phone use and tumors have so far been inconclusive, especially as far as long-term use of phones. The new Danish study, just published in the the British Medical Journal, disputes what a World Health Organization panel since just five months ago, that cellphones are “possibly carcinogenic.” But another study carried out in 13 countries found no overall increased risk linking cell phone use to cancer, but did say that that those with the highest level of cellphone use had a 40 percent higher risk of glioma, an aggressive type of brain tumor.

In the new Danish study, researchers led by the Institute of Cancer Epidemiology in Copenhagen looked at data for the whole Danish population aged 30 and over and born in Denmark after 1925, dividing people into subscribers and non-subscribers of mobile phones before 1995.

Overall, 10,729 central nervous system tumours occurred in the study period 1990-2007.

When the figures were restricted to people with the longest mobile phone use — 13 years or more — cancer rates were almost the same in both long-term users and non-subscribers of mobile phones.

Researchers emphasized that a “small to moderate increase in risk for subgroups of heavy users or after even longer induction periods than 10-15 years” still needs to be considered and have called for more research of large study populations.

Tara Parker-Pope of the New York Times notes the strengths of this study as well as a weakness:

The Danish study is important because it matches data from a national cancer registry with mobile phone contracts beginning in 1982, the year the phones were introduced in Denmark, until 1995. Because it used a computerized cohort that was tracked through registries and digitized subscriber data, it avoided the need to contact individuals and thus eliminated problems related to selection and recall bias common in other studies.

However, the major weakness of the study is that it counted cellphone subscriptions rather than actual use by individuals, and failed to count people who had corporate subscriptions or who used cellphones without a long-term contract. Those small details could have diluted any association between cellphone use and cancer risk, the investigators conceded.

With more than five billion mobile phone subscribers worldwide in 2010, concerns about health effects, and especially about tumors in the central nervous system, have risen accordingly.  Scientists describe the results of the new study as “reassuring.” Even if consumers do not find them to be such, are we any more likely to start using our cell phones less?

 

Related Care2 Coverage

Cell Phone Use Alters Brain Activity

Blowing The Whistle On Samsung’s Deadly Little Secret

Does Your Cell Phone Support Child Labor?

 

 

Read more: , , , , ,

Photo by Orin Zebest

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

245 comments

+ add your own
12:07PM PST on Nov 7, 2011

Sorry but I just don't believe this study. Pressing a radiative device to within 1/2 an inch of your brain just doesn't seem sensible. Yes, I've got one but I drive very old cars and I only use it to call AAA when they dump me on the freeway! Oh, I lie, I also take it into my chicken house if I have to go in after dark because my home built latch once stuck and locked me in!

4:24AM PDT on Nov 2, 2011

http://www.radiationresearch.org/pdfs/reasons_us.pdf

1:53AM PDT on Nov 1, 2011

Who paid for this study?!!

11:11AM PDT on Oct 29, 2011

BIG BIZ is deliberately putting out false information and false studies so we can't SUE them when we GET BRAIN CANCER. This is all about MONEY.

9:14PM PDT on Oct 28, 2011

People should stop posting results from inconclusive studies and reports which serve to confuse and obfuscate general knowledge about such controversial issues

8:55PM PDT on Oct 28, 2011

Bull.

8:52PM PDT on Oct 28, 2011

I'm not sure if I agree with this. It's not a true fact. Only time will tell.

6:56AM PDT on Oct 28, 2011

Yeah, I call BS...

9:32PM PDT on Oct 26, 2011

You know what causes cancer? REPUBLICANS, mark my words, if they get in office in 2012, the whole country will become a malignant tumor which will spread to all other countries. No amount of chemo can cure stupid.

5:11PM PDT on Oct 26, 2011

That's what they say this week, then next week new findings will probably be released to say otherwise. Either way I'm not taking chances.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

It's really cruel and uncalled for to fat shame (or any kind of shame) people. I'm sure it leads to…

I'm sure we'll see a lot of comments on this article because, as LBJ famously remarked, "Don't spit in…

NASAP sounds like an excellent project... It's a win-win undertaking...

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches and writes about ancient Greek and Latin and is Online Advocacy and Marketing... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.