A national survey by Clemson University’s International Center for Academic Integrity has found that more than 60 percent of undergraduate students, and more than 40 percent of graduate students, cheat in some way or other on their written work. The internet gets its brunt of the blame: It is just too easy, and too tempting, to cut, paste, change the font and a word or phrase or two here and there. Some have suggested that, in an age of mixing and sampling, students no longer have a clear distinction of what is original work vs. copied, i.e., plagiarized.
Lukas Neville, a doctoral student at Queen’s University in Ontario, suggests another reason: Income inequality. In the latest issue of Psychological Science, he says that states in the U.S. where there’s more evidence of academic dishonesty also show a large gap between the rich and the poor. These income gaps lead to less trust among people and, therefore, more cheating.
Neville’s own experiences teaching undergraduates led him to undertake the study. After finding that students had plagiarized assigned papers, he considered using automatic services (Turnitin.com is one) to check if students were cheating and then became interested in studying why it is that students cheat. Neville focused on trust, on the theory that “if students don’t trust each other, some of them might think they have to cheat to keep up with their unscrupulous classmates.”
Limitations of Plagiarism/Income Inequality Study
These premises make sense, though, as the Chronicle of Higher Education points out, the evidence that Neville used for his study is “limited”:
For starters, it’s circumstantial, based on the frequency of Google searches for things that seem linked to cheating on papers. Neville looked at Google searches for phrases like “free term paper” and the names of Web sites like Essaytown that offer paper-writing services or pre-written papers. Google breaks statistics on these searches out by state, which is a big help. It means that Neville was able to compare the number of searches in each state to measures of income inequality from the U.S. Census Bureau. (He did balance things out, statistically, to account for different numbers of college students in each state, how large the colleges are, and other factors that could affect the frequency of searches.)
Here is another caveat from my own experiences finding that students had plagiarized written material. I have not so much caught my students using papers written by some online service but have instead found portions of text copied from various sites around the internet (such as SparkNotes and PinkMonkey.com) and inserted into a student’s paper. In more than a few cases, I have been able to detect plagiarism simply because some parts of a paper seem to be written by someone different. A search on Google has often led me to a site with the plagiarized passage.
Support For Plagiarism/Income Inequality Study
In support of Neville’s theory, other research has shown a link between income disparity and distrust, as the Chronicle of Higher Education notes.
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.