Care2 will go offline for site maintenance July 31 at 9pm PST.
START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
895,585 people care about Women's Rights

Christian Anti-Choice Groups Sue For More Federal Subsidies

Christian Anti-Choice Groups Sue For More Federal Subsidies

Religious conservatives have a funny understanding of the separation of church and state and nowhere is this more obvious than the relationship between religious organizations and federal subsidies. Now, in a perfect world federal and state governments wouldn’t subsidize religious organizations, but our world is far from perfect. So much so that a Christian crisis pregnancy center is suing the federal government because it won’t subsidize its expansion.

Care Net is part of a national umbrella network of Christian crisis pregnancy centers, self-described women’s “health” centers designed to steer pregnant women away from abortions, often through deceptive practices and medically inaccurate information. Thanks in no small part to conservative attacks on reproductive rights nationwide, business for Care Net is doing well. So well the group applied to the federal government for a loan to help buy and renovate a building so it can offer Bible instruction and even more services aimed at preventing abortion.

Given the nature of Care Net’s mission and work, it should come as little surprise that the government denied the group’s loan request. But Care Net was surprised and is suing to force the government to give it the money.

The group lost the loan after government officials learned about a rewards-based learning program called “Learn to Earn” where expectant parents had to take a certain number of parenting and Bible study classes in order to receive free baby supplies. Care Net also offers “bible centered” programming designed to “heal” women post abortion and to promote abstinence-only sex education classes. Taken together, the government concluded that providing any funding to Care Net, even for any arguably non-religious services it may provide, created the potential for “excessive government entanglement with religion” and would therefore violate the First Amendment.

Sounds reasonable, right? After all, this “incidental funding” theory is the same conservatives push when trying to defund Planned Parenthood, so how can the religious right complain when the rules are applied to them?

Right. I’m still laughing at that last question, too.

Supported by the Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian conservative legal group and a private New Hampshire law firm, Care Net is arguing that the government’s actions violated the Fair Housing Act and its constitutional rights to free speech and equal protection under the law. In October, a federal judge ordered a federal hearing officer to consider these arguments in deciding whether Care Net should get the loan. The idea Care Net is pushing here is that protecting religious speech — as practiced through actions that in any other setting would violate other anti-discrimination laws — necessarily means the government turn a blind eye to those actions lest it “discriminate” against that speech. Confused yet? Because that’s the whole point — to confuse First Amendment jurisprudence beyond recognition. And they just might succeed.

The heart of the argument here, and in the legal challenges to the contraception mandate, is that the government can’t force Christians to comply with civil rights laws because those civil rights laws conflict with their religious rights. Never mind that the exercise of those religious rights impacts more than just the faithful, conservatives argue. Christian religious liberty trumps all.

Should the lawsuit succeed then we can expect to see more challenges to government restrictions on funding religious organizations as faith groups look for more and more ways to use federal dollars to spread their religious message while simultaneously restricting access to the services those federal dollars provide. And as states further slash social services spending faith groups stand ready to fill the vacuum of services left in those funding cuts, creating the perfect storm for an unprecedented and dangerous expansion of religion into our civic lives.

 

Related Stories:

More Creationism Bills Advance

Missour GOP Think Fraud By Crisis Pregnancy Centers OK

Crisis Pregnancy Centers Lie in Minnesota, Too

 

Read more: , , , , ,

Photo from photosteve101 via flickr.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

201 comments

+ add your own
2:14PM PDT on Jul 27, 2013

Since when was attacking freedom of choice christian?

6:37AM PDT on Jul 22, 2013

I also do not think religious groups should have the right to federal funding. (especially when so many of them are geared towards smaller government...how does that make any sense?)

3:17PM PST on Dec 17, 2012

Religious groups should not have the right to any public money.

2:33PM PST on Dec 14, 2012

The day we don't allow women to choose what happens to their bodies is the day when we live in a perfect world without rape or incest.

5:03AM PST on Dec 12, 2012

Thanks!

4:17AM PST on Dec 12, 2012

I just hope that whatever court hears this, the judge/s laugh them out of the courtroom.

6:55AM PST on Dec 10, 2012

Robby D. you're simply stupid. Enough said.

6:40AM PST on Dec 10, 2012

Robby....you're so WRONG about this that I don't know where to start! You just go on blaming President Obama for all your troubles.....don't get sand in your ears.

12:50AM PST on Dec 10, 2012

Most of this is due to obamacareless & it's attempt to force religions to cover birth control, abortions, etc, w/their $. When such stupid fights happen, people usually progress to stupider things & this all started w/stupidity- forcing people to buy insurance & a >2000p bill no one bothered to read. Intentionally under-reporting the budget for it by God knows how much! BUT, they DID add jobs! (LOFL!) for IRS agrents(!). But we really needed drs, nurses, etc- fat chance now! Medical care dropped sev notches in states that will let this pass. Think TNCare.

Ya HAD to see this coming! We're in a depression. ~15% out of work. This depression would rival the 30's if not for DC dictators mandating we call it a "recession" & "only" 8% unemp, plus our better safety net of social services! And worse, they knew taxes would have to be raised everywhere AND that the private sector would raise prices on everything to recover those losses. Anyone w/a brain KNEW, but figured someone would send some pixie dust our way!

And they smiled when they said "we'll have to pass it so you can see what's in it." And when the idiots bought it, hook, line, & sinker, it was obvious to the world; US sheeple are as easy to conquer as the rest of 'em. So yes, expect a LOT more of this stuff. It may be stupid, but it all started w/stupidity...

7:56PM PST on Dec 9, 2012

I wish these pro-birthers would spend as much energy, effort and money to help the children who are already born and livjng a life of hardships instead of forcing more children to be born into previously mentioned life.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

It's always great news to hear when animals win in conflicts with humans! Thank you for this awesome…

There are a lot of people getting pissed off at the ultra Orthodox community here in NY, including regular…

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.