In Case You Missed It: Congress Takes Your Internet Privacy

To the disappointent of advocates for civil liberties and internet freedom, the controversial Cyber Intelligence and Protection Act (CISPA) passed the U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday by a vote of 288-127. 196 Republicans voted for the measure and almost half the House Democrats.

Few would dispute that cybersecurity is not a concern. A rapid flurry of recent cyberattacks of government and corporate websites has highlighted the issue. But as Internet security experts argue, CISPA approaches the problem in a wrongheaded manner, allowing companies to share information to make their networks more secure but at a cost to users’ rights.

To protect the U.S. against hackers, CISPA allows companies, including internet service providers, to share information, the better to coordinate efforts in the event of a cyberattack. But CISPA is vague about precisely what sort of information will be shared. As a result, “in theory everything from e-mails to medical records could end up being shipped to intelligence agencies, even if it is not needed,” the Economist points out.

As Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Mark Jaycox explains,

Companies have new rights to monitor user actions and share data – including potentially sensitive user data – with the government without a warrant.

Cispa overrides existing privacy law, and grants broad immunities to participating companies.

CISPA’s supporters, including its sponsor, Michigan Republican Mike Rogers, say that the bill contains limitations that would keep the federal government from using and disclosing information as people would be able to bring lawsuits against it. But in its current incarnation, “if a company sends information about a user that is not cyberthreat information, the government agency does not notify the user, only the company,” writes Jaycox.

Having passed the House, CISPA is now headed for the Senate. Last year saw similar legislation (the Stop Online Piracy Act, SOPA) also clear the House only to be filibustered in the Senate. President Obama has indicated he may veto CISPA in its current incarnation.

Jaycox and others are not exactly holding their breath. Supporters for CISPA include TechNet, an industry group that counts Facebook and Google as members. Google has itself “taken no formal position on the draft legislation and is “watching the process closely,” according to the Economist. That is, large companies that, as we know, make use of our data in return for the services they provide for “free,” now have a chance to speak up about CISPA. As the bill proceeds to the Senate, what will they say — or will they continue to keep their view private, to themselves?


Related Care2 Coverage

CISPA Passes the House: Why We Should Be Wary, If Not Worried

New Laws for the Internet: Do We Have a Right to Be Forgotten?

Are Students’ School Records Safe in the Cloud?



Love This? Never Miss Another Story.


Kate M.
.28 days ago

Quite informative and the interesting blog for everyone, I simply loved it. life insurance

Helly F.
Past Member about a month ago

I have visited multiple sites to get this discussion, but whatever I have taken from here is superb. payday loans online

Herry P.
Past Member 2 months ago

Great and useful blog thanks! I will definitely see more posts here. Kitchen remodel Lakeville

Herry P.
Past Member 2 months ago

This post has unique features that can allure to anyone in a minute. ipv d2

Jones Henry
Jones Henry3 months ago

Really thought provoking post! Quite interesting things and have enjoyed immeasurably. Thanks Sugar Land roofing companies

.4 months ago

I would be supportive on all your articles and blogs as a result of they are simply up to the mark.

Past Member 6 months ago

Get the HELL out of my life.

Don H.
Don H.2 years ago

Than not then. I know the difference.

Don H.
Don H.2 years ago

Patricia H said;

"We have no privacy anyway"

You give up easy.

We should have privacy. That's the point.

If "we the people" feel we deserve privacy, we should have it. That is called "representative democracy". No government agency should have greater secrecy then the average citizen.

All this secrecy is how they have destroyed the national and world economy. It is how "they" have co-opted the national TV and radio media.

Wake up, before it's too late.

Don H.
Don H.2 years ago

Sonny H said; "Nothing to hide"

Our right to privacy has nothing to do with "nothing to hide".

While the government has encroached our our right to privacy they have simultaneously increased the level of government secrecy.

Give that some thought, at least.

It no longer looks like a representative democracy to me.