START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
1,240,244 people care about Civil Rights

City Seeks to Outlaw Bicyclists and Pedestrians

City Seeks to Outlaw Bicyclists and Pedestrians


Written by Brian Merchant, a Treehugger blogger

In what is not an alternative draft of the screenplay for Footloose but an actual news item, a town in Wisconsin has moved to solve its bicycle and pedestrian safety issues by making a simple law: No more walking and biking. It looks like the city of Hull may just become the least green city in the entire world.

From the Stevens Point Journal (via Grist):

A town public safety committee, which examined general safety on town roads this summer, came up with a draft ordinance in September that requires biking, running or walking groups to register their travel plans with the town or bans them from using roads outright.The ordinance is in response to what town officials say is a growing problem with road safety, but local groups are concerned about the impact on biking and running in the town.

Well, desperate times call for desperate measures, right? But, um: “According to data from Portage County’s Planning, Zoning and Land Conservation Department, in the past 10 years, the almost 32-square-mile town has had five pedestrian-car crashes, and one bike-car crash. The town hasn’t had a crash involving a bike or pedestrian since 2008,” the Journal reports.

So why would a town that hasn’t had an accident with bikes or pedestrians in three years suddenly seek to eliminate them? One can only assume the town is being run by the modern-day equivalent of the witch from Hansel and Gretel, who is secretly orchestrating a plot to fatten up, and then eat, all of the city’s residents. It’s quite simply the only explanation.

This post was originally published by Treehugger.


Related Stories:

Dance Your Way to Work vs. Sitting in Traffic (Video)

6 Tips to Free Yourself From Your Car

LA Eliminates Entire Car Lane For Safer Bike Travel


Read more: , , , , ,

Photo from The Prudent Cyclist via flickr creative commons

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
5:58AM PDT on Mar 22, 2012

A strange sight of a city with no pedestrians and people on bikes. A ghost city perhaps?

2:07AM PST on Jan 23, 2012


11:55AM PST on Nov 9, 2011

Yeah Annmari L., 'cos we know that drivers never break the rules, right? I mean I've never heard of a driver speeding, driving drunk, running stop signs or red lights. That never happens. Cyclists are clearly to blame for virtually all humankind's ills. Including vehicle pollution - I mean we wouldn't have to drive cars if cyclists weren't so obnoxious - am I right or am I right?

11:10AM PDT on Oct 30, 2011

My first reaction was Great, go for it! because I do loathe bikers and pedestrians being as I am, a professional driver. Both those groups disregard any and all traffic rules and instead insist that it is us motor vehicle drivers that are responsible for their headless actions: running red lights, biking the wrong direction on one-way streets, crossing double lines, walking across when the red light is on, etc.
But then I realized it was a comedian turning local politics into absurdium and started laughing. Though, I wouldn't have minded some harsh regulations towards the walking/biking terrorists! Hah!!

10:06PM PDT on Oct 27, 2011

Note: My point, if unclear, is that this is one very significant reason to reduce our dependence on motor vehicles. The more we use alternatives, the less we fill the air with deadly carcinogens.
This,. of course, is only one of many reasons protect and encourage alternatives to motor vehicle use as much as possible.

10:02PM PDT on Oct 27, 2011

People need to understand that (according to the AMA, etc.) exposure to traffic fumes is far more dangerous to your health than exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke. This is because the most carcinogenic type of smoke is the kind that contains oil particles (engines that burn gas/oil). Under 18% of US adults smoke, and most people have no exposure to tobacco smoke whatsoever. By contrast, the great majority to heavy exposure to traffic fumes every day. Unless we address the actual leading cause of breathing-related disease, there isn't a chance that we'll be able to reduce it.

10:54AM PDT on Oct 24, 2011

Why would I suspect persons of interest with the city should be persons of interest with the DA's office? I pray there are conflicts of interest; I don't want to imagine this many, even in a town this small, could be so stupid, Draconian.

5:28AM PDT on Oct 24, 2011

So amazingly stupid law!!!

4:04AM PDT on Oct 24, 2011

Wow, what a stupid law! How can anyone justify outlawing something as fundamental as walking? What's next - breathing, sleeping and eating?

2:23PM PDT on Oct 23, 2011

So stupid.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Wow, it is really amazing how similar the zealots in the Borg Collective are to the zealots in the anti-abortion…

I like Jan don't eat meat. So not a concern for me. Thanks Abigail

Kitties rule, sleepy or not! Cute little furballs!

ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.