START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,489,746 people care about Environment & Wildlife

ConocoPhillips Abandons Amazon Oil Drilling Project

ConocoPhillips Abandons Amazon Oil Drilling Project

Just days ago, ConocoPhillips CEO James Mulva announced that his company would discontinue its involvement in a controversial oil drilling project in a remote area of the northern Peruvian Amazon.

The oil company had been under fire from environmental and human rights organizations for its involvement in a joint venture with Repsol-YPF in an area known as “Oil Block 39.”

The operation was seen as a threat to the indigenous peoples living in voluntary isolation in the Oil Block 39 region, and organizations claim the local tribes risked forced displacement and deadly epidemic as a result of the oil companies’ presence there.

The region that contains Oil Block 39 is considered to be one of the most biodiverse in the world and is home to at least two uncontacted indigenous tribes. Uncontacted Indians lack immunity to diseases brought by oil workers and could react violently if their lands are at threat.

Last year, more than 50 international NGOs signed a letter asking oil companies Repsol, Perenco and ConocoPhillips to withdraw immediately from the region.

“Oil operations in regions inhabited by isolated indigenous peoples presents [sic] an unavoidable and unacceptable risk to their continued survival,” said Mitch Anderson, Corporate Campaigns Director at Amazon Watch. “It is crucial now that remaining operators in the region, Perenco and Repsol, follow ConocoPhillips’ lead and withdraw from these controversial oil blocks.”

Amazon Watch reports that the Peruvian government has disregarded the extensive anthropological evidence supporting the existence of uncontacted tribes in this region and the lead operator of Block 39, Repsol-YPF, continues seismic exploration while the Anglo-French company Perenco pushes ahead with production in Block 67.

“If these global businesses truly care about ethical responsibility they cannot continue to work in areas where they are endangering peoples’ lives,” said Survival International director Stephen Corry. “It is not possible to obtain uncontacted tribes’ permission to work in these oil blocks, so the only logical conclusion is that they should keep off their land.”

ConocoPhillips held a 45% interest in Block 39 in a co-venture with Repsol-YPF, the block operator and majority owner. The company did not reveal the buyer of their stake.

To urge Peruvian President Alan Garcia to protect uncontacted tribes, sign the petition here.

Related Reading:

Illegal Mahogany Logging Threatens Uncontacted Tribes In Peru
 
Uncontacted Tribes Threatened by Illegal Logging in the Amazon

Amazon Chief Teams with Google to Save His Tribe

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

Image Credit: Flickr - Daveness_98

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

71 comments

+ add your own
6:48PM PDT on Jun 1, 2011

I SENSE HUMANITY IN THE MIDST...

7:48PM PDT on May 24, 2011

Robyn B. - I couldn't agree more. Unfortunately when it comes to Big Oil, the only language they understand is in terms of who owns what. I believe they would drill just about anywhere if they had the money and the means. The strongest argument to get them off the land is to say that they don't own it and have no right to start tearing it up. Obviously the Peruvian Gov't are just as corrupt, by choosing to ignore the evidence for the tribes, and also by allowing yet another piece of (increasingly rare) unspoilt jungle home to plants and animals become a polluted muddy wasteland

10:27AM PDT on May 23, 2011

I'm concerned that the only argument presented in the article against oil drilling in the Amazon was an anthropocentric one. What about the environmental damage to native plant and animal species? It's time we stop thinking only of our own species above all others.

9:52AM PDT on May 20, 2011

Very Good News!

9:39AM PDT on May 19, 2011

Signed....great news

7:45AM PDT on May 19, 2011

Posted to Facebook that I signed.

1:01AM PDT on May 19, 2011

I signed, but am not able to share any of CARE2's petitions in twitter.

11:45PM PDT on May 17, 2011

Great news!

10:33PM PDT on May 16, 2011

Nice to hear. A good news per day is well taken!

10:24AM PDT on May 16, 2011

Glad they are going - wish they would clean up after themselves before they leave!

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Let's hope they get the grant and there are no delays. Eco-bridges should be constructed over all major…

Oh, oh! We are living on the cusp... Life goes on...

THANKS THEIR ARE JUST PEOPLE THAT DO NOT KNOW HOW TO ACT they should be stopped

meet our writers

Beth Buczynski Beth is a freelance writer and editor living in the Rocky Mountain West. So far, Beth has lived in... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.