START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Conservatives Prefer Wasting Energy Over Protecting the Environment, Study Says

Conservatives Prefer Wasting Energy Over Protecting the Environment, Study Says

Written by Chris Tackett

Why do conservatives like to waste energy?” asks Tim McDonnell about a disturbing study on attitudes towards energy conservation:

A study out today in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences examined attitudes about energy efficiency in liberals and conservatives, and found that promoting energy-efficient products and services on the basis of their environmental benefits actually turned conservatives off from picking them. The researchers first quizzed participants on how much they value various benefits of energy efficiency, including reducing carbon emissions, reducing foreign oil dependence, and reducing how much consumers pay for energy; cutting emissions appealed to conservatives the least.

The study then presented participants with a real-world choice: With a fixed amount of money in their wallet, respondents had to “buy” either an old-school light bulb or an efficient compact florescent bulb (CFL), the same kind Bachmann railed against. Both bulbs were labeled with basic hard data on their energy use, but without a translation of that into climate pros and cons. When the bulbs cost the same, and even when the CFL cost more, conservatives and liberals were equally likely to buy the efficient bulb. But slap a message on the CFL’s packaging that says “Protect the Environment,” and “we saw a significant drop-off in more politically moderates and conservatives choosing that option,” said study author Dena Gromet, a researcher at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business.

The author of the study says that political polarization of climate change is the reason conservatives choose to avoid products marketed as green, even though they may also save money in the long run. That may be the case, but I suspect it also has something to do with the right-wing framing of global warming as a hoax concocted by people like Al Gore to make money. They may see any product touting its greenness as putting money into the pockets of their political opposition or as a deception to be avoided.

I was also reminded of examples of people intentionally wasting energy out of spite due to their dislike for environmentalists or liberals. For example, the libertarian/conservative think tank, CEI opposed Earth Hour by encouraging people to keep the lights on. It’s also not at all uncommon to see Facebook posts or tweets like these of people touting their poor MPG on their vehicle or plans to litter, because they dislike “tree huggers.”

Why do you think conservatives are avoiding products marketed as green? And what should be done about it to make the issue less divisive?

(This video is a spoof.)

This post was originally published by TreeHugger.

 

Read more: , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

97 comments

+ add your own
1:44PM PDT on Aug 15, 2013

Thank you Chris for the article. and thanks to the 95 members who commented on the postings. I enjoyed reading all of them

4:01AM PDT on Jun 15, 2013

thanks for sharing

3:54AM PDT on May 26, 2013

This is crappy ..

4:21AM PDT on May 8, 2013

Surprised anyone???

8:11AM PDT on May 7, 2013

It may be a population control issue that conservatives are not allowed to speak of. Wars of wasteful horror, terrorism by drones/cluster bombs, fracking and other natural horrors like controlling the food chain, (Monsanto) everything they do seems bent on killing people (except unborn babies - a little confused on that irony still) - I think these people may be trying to save the Earth by destroying humanity... which might just work. Earth doesn't need mankind... it has survived much worse afflictions.

2:21AM PDT on May 7, 2013

Should we be surprised?

11:28AM PDT on May 6, 2013

Wesley,

While the rate of change is important, it is not unprecedented. See the following:

http://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/abrupt-climate-change-during-the-last-ice-24288097

Temperatures in Greenland warmed 8 - 15C over a matter of decades. Recently, Greenalnd has warmed less tha 2C over the past 15 decades. Granted, Greenland had much more room for heating during the depths of the last ice age.

http://www.clim-past.net/9/583/2013/cp-9-583-2013.pdf

9:45AM PDT on May 6, 2013

A responsible Tory? You want to come over to England, and taste the atmosphere...

8:30AM PDT on May 6, 2013

Interesting that the 'conservatives' are willing to 'cut off their nose and poke out their eye to spite their face.'

It's more important to them to NOT protect the environment (upon which their lives depend,) WHILE WASTING THEIR MONEY!!

When did 'conservative' change it's meaning from 'saving' to 'wasting'?!

4:11AM PDT on May 6, 2013

They should be more responsible than this. Thanks for sharing.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

"Statistically any given American is more likely to marry Kim Kardashian than catch Ebola."

The swine flu & SARS epidemics did not occur when the Tea Party was trying to terrify Americans into…

Fear mongers. I could care less...clergy are sick also and human and I would tell them to their face…

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches and writes about ancient Greek and Latin and is Online Advocacy and Marketing... more
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.