START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
582,675 people care about Real Food

Critics Raise Alarms Over Stanford Organics Study

Critics Raise Alarms Over Stanford Organics Study
  • 1 of 2

When Alice’s adventures in Wonderland were growing increasingly strange, she described them as “curiouser and curiouser.” That may be the best line to describe the Stanford study raising such a ruckus among those on opposite sides of the organics-versus-conventional debate.

Recently, I pointed out some of the flaws in the study. For example:

  • Seminal works that would likely have resulted in a very different result were left out of the survey.
  • Although the authors admitted conventionally raised foods contain more toxic residues, they saw no problem with that.
  • While higher amounts of some nutrients were attributed to an organic diet, the authors didn’t seem to think that mattered.
  • No long-term studies were included, nor were there any studies in which participants ate only an organic or conventional diet.
  • The authors acknowledged “publication bias” in some of the studies but included them anyway.
  • They ignored the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s nutrient tables, which have shown a gradual decline in the nutritional value of conventionally raised crops.

 


Whether or not corporate influence in this paper is direct, as some critics imply, Stanford has strong ties to some of the major beneficiaries and proponents of industrialized agriculture. Among them are Cargill, Caterpillar, British Petroleum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (investors in and supporters of Monsanto). This is not to say all of Stanford’s donors set out to influence its researchers. However, corporate influence on university research is ubiquitous and influences outcomes.

Some critics of the study pointed to Ingram Olkin’s participation. NaturalNews fingered Olkin as “an ‘anti-science’ propagandist working for Big Tobacco.” They correctly pointed out that in 1976 he received $12,000 from Philip Morris to develop a statistical approach to risk analysis. Conveniently, his research contributed to the tobacco industry’s long fight to deny that smoking was a health issue.

Although more than 35 years have passed since Olkin’s tobacco-related study, OpEdNews considers his participation in this one tainted. They reason that the research team used Olkin’s meta-analysis to generate the results reported in the organics study. Therefore, the study is using poor methodology.

Researchers always quarrel about each others’ hypotheses and methodology, but Olkin’s meta-analysis should be supported or dismissed on grounds more solid than his statistics having helped the tobacco industry nearly four decades ago. After all, he may actually have refined his approach since then.

Beyond Olkin, the research team appears to have no particular ties to anything nefarious. Nor do they appear to have any particular expertise in food or food systems issues.

One final concern has been raised, the timing of the study’s publication. Californians will be voting on Prop 37 in November. Big Ag (including Big Organic) is firmly opposed to GMO labeling and is shoveling money into the campaign to defeat the proposition. Proponents are fighting hard but have a fraction of the resources.

Next: The Flawed Study Should Be Ignored

  • 1 of 2

Read more: , , , , , ,

Photos 1 and 2: Thinkstock; Photo 3 from Austin Valley via Flickr Creative Commons

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

101 comments

+ add your own
6:04AM PDT on Sep 25, 2013

Thank you Cathryn, for Sharing this!

3:31AM PST on Nov 19, 2012

Thanks for the article.

4:30PM PDT on Sep 18, 2012

Eat organic...better for you...better for the earth...

3:22AM PDT on Sep 17, 2012

Thank you.

5:54PM PDT on Sep 16, 2012

Where are the petitions on the fraud of the study.
WHERE ARE THE PETITIONS.

5:52PM PDT on Sep 16, 2012

THERE NEED TO BE LONG TERM AND SHORT TERM STUDIES DONE BY OTHER PEOPLE.

5:51PM PDT on Sep 16, 2012

THIS STUDY IS SIMPLY PAID FOR BY THE PEOPLE WHO MAKE THE MONEY ON GMO'S GE'S AND NON-ORGANIC FOOD.
THE STUDY IS A FAKE, A FRAUD, A DISHONESTY.

5:48PM PDT on Sep 16, 2012

People who paid to have the study done -- have their money in non-organic.
PEOPLE WHO PAID TO HAVE THE STUDY DONE -- HAVE THEIR MONEY INVESTED IN NON-ORGANIC. SO THE STUDY IS BIASED.
Many People who have gone all organic over a period of years -- as individuals -- have told me of their imporvement in health.

It would be good to see many long-term studies of people who go organic and taking the other factors in their life into consideration.

12:41PM PDT on Sep 16, 2012

So much craziness over this study and that study, and the refutation of this study and that study. Use your common sense, take it all with a grain of salt.

The industrial food production and marketing industries are feeling the pinch, and they fight back with all the usual methods at their disposal. Debunking them is important, getting nuts over it gives your energy and power away.

I never ate organic because I thought it has higher nutritional value. I prefer to use organic methods and compounds in raising food because it's better for the dirt of the Earth. I eat organic because I don't want to eat any more human-made chemicals when I can possibly avoid them. A lot of organic foods taste better to me...for the same reason home-grown tastes better...and I trust my own taste buds. I like giving my money to folks of whom I approve, so I'd rather give my money to organic farmers...local folks as much as possible.

4:49PM PDT on Sep 15, 2012

thanks

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Foreplay.... Heh,heh,heh...

Multistate Cyclospora Outbreak Sickens 202 People http://foodpoisoningbulletin.com/2014/multistate-cyclospora-outbreak-sickens-202-people/ Gee,…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.