START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,422,085 people care about Environment & Wildlife

Cruel Badger Cull Meets Embarrassing End

Cruel Badger Cull Meets Embarrassing End

Two controversial badger culls have been labeled as failures and have finally been stopped after it became clear that those going after them wouldn’t be able to kill enough badgers to meet their targets. While this has led to relief among animal advocates, it also raises concerns that what was done will make things worse.

The pilot programs were run in Gloustershire and Somerset in an effort to stop the spread of Bovine Tuberculosis (bTB) among cattle, but killing badgers to solve the problem has caused controversy among scientists, farmers, the government and animal advocates.

The programs were designed to see whether or not shooting free-running badgers at night, as opposed to trapping them, would help stop the spread of bTB. Scientists and animal advocacy groups — including the Badger Trust, Humane Society International/UK, RSPCA, League Against Cruel Sports and the International Fund for Animal Welfare, among others — have all come out strongly opposing using badgers as scapegoats for a problem affecting cattle.

Concerns weren’t only raised about the cruelty inherent in shooting badgers and about the possibility of leaving many wounded to die slowly from their injuries, but also about whether or not it would even be effective.

According to one significant study, the Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT), “badger culling can make no meaningful contribution to cattle TB control in Britain.” It also concluded that weak testing for cattle keep them contributing significantly to the problem and that, “Scientific findings indicate that the rising incidence of disease can be reversed, and geographical spread contained, by the rigid application of cattle-based control measures alone.”

Unfortunately, science wasn’t enough to stop the culls from starting. Last month, Natural England granted an eight-week extension to the cull in Gloustershire after marksmen failed to meet the their target goal of 70 percent of the population, but the whole thing was shut down after they failed to meet even the reduced goal during the extension.

The cull in Somerset also failed to meet its target, despite a three-week extension there. According to the Telegraph, Natural England said the cull was ended because there is “no realistic prospect of the cull removing the number of badgers required by the licence.”

While the cruelty and effectiveness were questioned to begin with, the failure to meet the target goal in the set time period raises serious questions about where all of these troublesome badgers are and about the governments ability to run these programs effectively and humanely.

Not only have millions been spent to senselessly kill hundreds of badgers, but many are now concerned that the badgers who were left will disperse and potentially spread the disease to new areas, while others will move in to fill their place, which will both cause more problems.

“I am much relieved the government’s badger cull fiasco is finally over, for the time being at least. We hope the government will now do the decent thing and admit that killing badgers to control TB in cattle is a ludicrous and inhumane idea,” Mark Jones, executive director of Humane Society International/UK, told the Guardian.

According to the League Against Cruel Sports, even though the culls have ended, the government is still planning on running them for the next three years and starting them in other areas. The organization also raised concerns about findings that the government is considering gassing them, even though that was banned in 1982 because it’s considered inhumane.

TAKE ACTION!

Please sign and share the petition urging the government to stop needlessly killing badgers and use common sense to deal with the spread of bTB.

Read more: , , , , , ,

Photo credit: Thinkstock

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

315 comments

+ add your own
10:23AM PST on Jan 13, 2014

Culls are never the solution......humans need to find humane ways of coexisting with our fellow species. They have the right to live on this planet, free from harm.

6:40AM PST on Dec 16, 2013

Its not just Badgers that carry this disease. Why don't farmers bring there livestock in on a night time and put the animals in a safe area and disinfect there land and do there bit to keep disease away. all animals are on this planet for a reason. I'm glad the cull was called off it was a pointless act and a complete waste of tax payers money. The money should be invested into finding a cure.

1:56AM PST on Dec 16, 2013

The government is more interested in showing 'muscle' than in addressing the actual problem - which would probably also cost more.

5:48AM PST on Dec 15, 2013

Signed!

12:26PM PST on Dec 12, 2013

I'm so glad for this!

9:35PM PST on Dec 11, 2013

The badger culls were an awful answer to a much more complex problem. The idiot that came up with this brilliant idea should be fired! It didn't solve any problems, but as a result innocent badgers were killed to solve a problem with farm cows, say what? Solve the health issues with cows down on the farm with proper testings and shots!

3:30PM PST on Dec 11, 2013

Thank goodness they've ended for now at least!

11:23PM PST on Dec 10, 2013

Why carry on with this cruel and ludicrous, not to mention inefficient, practice when it clearly isn't working?

10:31AM PST on Dec 10, 2013

Sad, must be another way to solve this.

7:03AM PST on Dec 10, 2013

demagogic behaviour

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches ancient Greek, Latin and Classics at Saint Peter's University in New Jersey.... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.