START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
570,720 people care about Real Food

Cutting School Lunch Choices For Kids Who Can’t Pay

Cutting School Lunch Choices For Kids Who Can’t Pay

The Lee County Public School District in Florida has a problem.

When classes resumed on January 3 after the winter break, as many as 1,100 students weren’t paying for their school meals.

The district, which is the ninth-largest in Florida, and the 40th-largest in the United States, was losing about $2,000 a week on its school lunches. (There are over 14,000 public school districts in the U.S. in total.)


Because the National School Lunch Program, or NSLP, requires participating schools to provide nourishing meals for all pupils, what do school administrators do if a pupil shows up in the lunchroom with no cash and with no money left in his or her electronic meal account?

Most raise their prices for kids who can pay, according to research by the nonprofit School Nutrition Association, which found that nearly 60 percent of public school districts raised lunch prices in 2009, the last full year for which national figures were available.

The Agriculture Department — which administers the NSLP — says roughly two-thirds of the 5 billion meals served under the program each year are free or are sold at a reduced price. That means you can’t keep raising meal prices indefinitely, because the burden is disproportionally borne by the pupils who buy the one-third of meals sold at full price.

So What Did They Decide To Do?

They came up with the same solution that’s being used in various schools across the nation: students who can’t pay get one free lunch per week. After that, they get an “alternate lunch,” which in Lee County is a cheese sandwich and a 4-ounce juice box.

What’s Going On Here?

The subsidized lunch program is available for families who have fallen below the government poverty line. With the recent economic downturn, many families are now eligible, but they either don’t know, or don’t like the stigma attached to the free lunch program.

And that really hurts districts like Lee County, since if a school can get more eligible children to enroll in the subsidized lunch program, the federal government will pick up more of the bill.

“Alternate Lunches” Being Served Around The Country

In Lee County, they’ve been working to inform needy families, and things are looking up, but reports that “alternate lunches” of a sandwich along with juice or milk were being served this month in public school districts in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and Washington State.

All of this is extremely ironic, considering that the Agriculture Department is currently considering a proposal for announced last month that would require school meals to reduce sodium by half, serve more vegetables and whole grains, limit saturated fats and switch to low-fat milk and dairy products.

Let’s hope this mess can get sorted out.

Read more: , , , , , ,


quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
9:43AM PDT on Aug 27, 2011

The landfills are filled with food that the government does away with just to keep prices high. The very least they could do is to use this food to give children in schools a decent lunch. They also pay farmers not to grow to keep prices high. As to Robby C. the only way the government is going to reduce the debt is by keeping that 2.6 trillion dollars in T-Bonds owed to SS . I go by the unemployment office all the time and there are lines of people looking for a job in a poultry plant. You act as though everyone who doesn't have a job is because they are lazy. I know people who are out of work and will do anything to earn money. The jobs were shipped out of this country. Try putting the blame where it really belongs on all politicians who voted for Free Trade.

3:07AM PDT on Apr 28, 2011

A sandwich, some juice and fruit from home will be a good solution.

10:39AM PDT on Mar 15, 2011

they can't afford lunches but cops, government workers and politicians all get raises the last 3 years..........stupid.

5:00PM PDT on Mar 13, 2011

I always took lunches from home when I was in school. I doubt the children would go without lunch if the schools did not provide free or reduced price lunches. This would only force the lazy parents to get off their butts and take the time to make a sandwich for their kids. They would do it if it wasn't forr the handouts.

7:25AM PST on Mar 8, 2011

what about sandwiches from home?

3:57PM PST on Mar 7, 2011

What happened to lunch from home? It's cheaper and far healthier.

9:25AM PST on Mar 7, 2011

Poor liberals. All worried about a lunch
If you don't want starving kids , quit breeding
Only have kids when u can afford them then you don't have your hand out all the time begging for responsible to pay your way

2:35AM PST on Mar 7, 2011

Petra- actually, this article makes it sound as if that's not true- about the meals already being subsidized. It may not have all the information, but here it is saying that they have been raising some meal prices (for those who pay) to pay for those who could not (or would not?). That's what's starting all of this & causing a good part of this debate.

"The Agriculture Department — which administers the NSLP — says roughly two-thirds of the 5 billion meals served under the program each year are free or are sold at a reduced price. That means you can't keep raising meal prices indefinitely, because the burden is disproportionally borne by the pupils who buy the one-third of meals sold at full price."

1:51AM PST on Mar 7, 2011

The school lunches are already subsidized. Even the "full price" is inexpensive to students. But there are those who cannot afford much, and fall between the cracks. For those children, they still need to eat.

12:35AM PST on Mar 7, 2011

Yeah... if the parents are so poor they cannot afford lunch for their kids, then government needs to step up. But if this is just because of lazyness, absent from taking care of their children, this is not acceptable. But the question is can you bear to see the children without good meal ?

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Yes, Kevin B. but not a funny joke. Although I do have an affinity for the term "abortion pills",…

I am eternally grateful to have universal health care. It is not perfect, but certainly health care is…

meet our writers

Colleen H. Colleen H. is an Online Campaigner with Care2 and a recent transplant to San Francisco from the East... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK


Civil Rights


Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights


Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.