GOP Proposal Hurts Those Already Hurting the Most


New Jersey Governor Chris Christie came under fire for slashing $900 million from programs for the poor, individuals with disabilities and senior citizens. Christie affected his usual “I don’t care what you think” attitude and signed a budget that disproportionately hurt those who are already hurting while saying a big “no” to a millionaire’s tax. The cuts outlined in House Speaker John Boehner’s debt ceiling proposal to save $1.5 trillion in entitlement spending are similarly devastating to those who are they most in need. Boehner’s proposal includes cuts to Social Security and Medicare benefits for current retirees; a repeal of coverage extensions provided by the Affordable Care Act;  measures that cut Medicare payments; the end of the safety-net for low-income children, parents, senior citizens and individuals with disabilities.

It’s not just Christie who doesn’t care. A new Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) report reports that 20 states have made “deep, identifiable cuts” in health care that will reduce access to care for low-income children, seniors, families and individuals with disabilities, says ThinkProgress. From the report:

Arizona has frozen enrollment in part of its Medicaid program, so that an estimated 100,000 low-income people who previously would have qualified will not be able to enter the program, and another 150,000 will face more stringent rules for retaining eligibility. Washington has frozen enrollment for a state-run health plan serving approximately 40,000 low-income residents, which is expected to reduce the number of participants to 37,000 in 2012 and to 33,000 in 2013.

Cuts to Medicare also affect hospitals that disproportionately serve the poor and elderly in urban areas.  In New York, teaching hospitals which could lose as much as $1 billion a year if  the Medicare subsidy for training doctors and providing intensive medical services — trauma centers, burn units — is cut. The subsidy, which goes back to the 1960s, helped to make New York’s teaching hospitals among the most prestigious in the world, with about 16,000 doctors a year, or 14.5 percent of the nation’s total, more than any other states. Hospital officials say the payments cover the residents’ salaries and benefits and also those of supervising physicians’ salaries and benefits, plus overhead like classroom space.

The subsidies have been criticized by both conservatives and liberals as “sweetheart deal for teaching hospitals in a few states” and a “hidden subsidy” for the operating costs of NYC hospitals. In December, the Simpson-Bowles Commission, which advised President Obama on debt and deficit reduction, called for reducing “excess” payments to hospitals for medical education.

However, as the New York Times points out:

….the administrators of New York’s teaching hospitals say they operate on very thin margins because they serve large proportions of patients who are receiving government insurance for the poor and the elderly, and because they provide some of the most sophisticated — and expensive — medical treatment in the country. Either way, the hospitals have come to depend on the money.

Three New York hospitals — Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx and Mount Sinai Medical Center and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital in Manhattan — would suffer the most from the cuts, followed by U.P.M.C.-Presbyterian in Pittsburgh, the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia and Massachusetts General Hospital. With 18,000 employees, Montefiore Medical Center is one of the Bronx’s main employers. It trains 1,200 residents at any one time and produces 350 to 400 doctors a year. 80 percent of the hospital’s patients are on either Medicare, or Medicaid, the program for the poor. While Montefiore, a nonprofit institution, has a budget of about $3 billion, its revenues exceed its expenses “by only one percentage point,” all of which is invested back in the hospital.

In lawmakers can’t come to some sort of agreement about raising the federal debt ceiling, individuals with disabilities will be hurt in yet another way: The debt crisis could mean that they’ll end up going without Supplemental Security Income, or SSI, benefits come August. As Disability Scoop says, when asked earlier this week about what will happen to the 70 million Americans who rely on these benefits, President Obama said:

“Well, when it comes to all the checks, not just Social Security — veterans, people with disabilities — about 70 million checks are sent out each month — if we default then we’re going to have to make adjustments. And I’m already consulting with (Treasury) Secretary Geithner in terms of what the consequences would be.”

In other words — all the more if the federal debt ceiling isn’t raised in a week and the US defaults — the message that’s being sent to America’s “poor, tired and hungry” is pretty much, “stay that way.”

Related Care2 Coverage

Budgets Reflect Moral Choices As Much As Fiscal Realities

Obama Calls For “Balanced Approach” and “Compromise”

Wealth Gap Between Whites, Minorities At Historic High

Photo by frerieke

Love This? Never Miss Another Story.


Patrick F.
Patrick f.4 years ago

The GOP has only one interest....WAR, domestic, overseas, you name it. The are hell bent on destruction at any cost.

Amanda M.
Amanda M.4 years ago

Forget being breadwinners, these people are already trying to survive on CRUMBS! And the Republican Reich wants to take even THOSE away! Whiskey Tango Foxtrot is wrong with this picture?

Republicans = EVIL. 'Nuff said.

Lori Ann Hone
Lori Hone4 years ago

Why are their any Republicans in office left?

Cheryl M. D.
Cheryl Dare4 years ago

You better believe I'm scared the GOP will cut services for the poor. I receive disability now and can barely get by on $783.00 a month. I haven't had a COLA in three years now but the price of food (a necessity, damn it,) is still going up and I will eventually be forced to exist on rice and beans. Fresh fruits and vegetables are out of my budget and frozen veggies may, too, if this keeps up. As it is, I only get $16 a month in food stamps, and am quite dependent on at least 14 different meds for my health. What happens when Medicare and Medicaid are cut back and I have to pay for all those? I sure couldn't afford both! Why on Earth can't we cut a lot of the budget to bare bones by getting our wars out of Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya and Iraq? All are unnecessary for our security and none helps establish democracies.

Pat M.
PC McComb4 years ago

Two comments/questions to the GOP/TP'ers/ Holier-then-thou, and bible thumpers:
1st, On the day of your judgement, as you stand before God, what will be your answer to him when he asks you WHY you treated your fellow man of *lesser means* the way you did. I also think God will tell you that his son, Jesus will have some questions for you as well.
2ndly, Jesus was a progressive !

myra d.
myra d.4 years ago

The lack of empathy and compassion that's being exhibited is just breath taking. The biblical quote from Mathew is very appropriate. Peace.

James D.
James D.4 years ago

You cannot currently send a star to Joan E. because you have done so within the last week.

James D.
James D.4 years ago

Actually Mercedes L., the bill for the unfunded wars is over 300 million dollars a day. Don't be so soft on the fools. ;-)

James D.
James D.4 years ago

For everyone who really thinks, or even those who just say it but know better, that President Obama has in anyway been responsible for the deficit and debt problems we are currently facing (also for those who need to use this to try to get through to them all day long every day):

James D.
James D.4 years ago

Since, invariably, these miserable excuses claim to be Good Christians, I must remind them of what they have failed to remember: Matthew 25:41-46

Then shall he (the Lord) say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels; For when I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee? Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these (your brothers and sisters in need), ye did it not to me. And these (on the left hand) shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous (who did the right things) into life eternal.

Unless, of course, all the miserly, misbegotten, misogynous, money worshiping, misguided and misguiding Republican Christians out there want to argue with the words of their Lord.

Vote Progressive!