START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
1,697,689 people care about Politics

Dear Republicans, It’s Time to Stop Calling Everything You Disagree With “Socialism”

Dear Republicans, It’s Time to Stop Calling Everything You Disagree With “Socialism”

It’s absolutely unsurprising that Jim DeMint, the former Republican senator from South Carolina, is rabidly anti-Obamacare. He’s the president of the Heritage Foundation, for crying out loud. What I find discouraging, however, is his reliance on the outdated and overused trope of socialism to justify his opposition.

DeMint’s recent comments on Obamacare were reported in Think Progress:

“I cannot think of anything that’s more un-American than national government-run health care,” DeMint said. “Those who believe in those principles of socialism and collectivism we’ve seen over the centuries, they see as their holy grail taking control of the health care system.”

I’m so tired of this old line. It seems like everyone who wants to rally against Big Government will invoke some mythical fight we’re still having against socialism, as if we still live in the 1950s and the biggest evil anyone can think of is Soviet Union. I guess that, even though it’s 2013 and the Soviet Union is no more, nothing scares the pants off a dyed in the wool conservative like the ghost of a planned economy.

Even disregarding the fact that it’s an obvious tool to keep us wedged in an us-vs-them mentality, I just need to ask why. Why is it un-American to band together and take care of people who have been hit by hard times or who haven’t had the same opportunities as other people? When did America turn from being a place of hope to a country that leaves the have-nots out in the cold?

The conservative conversation around Obamacare seems to be a fear of government intrusion into our private decisions. I’m not unfamiliar with that fear. I mean, I do have a functioning uterus.

There are two problems with this line of reasoning, though. The first problem is that the fear isn’t very specific. We live in a country that is founded on the belief that individuals should be able to follow their own paths to happiness. At least, that’s what we tell ourselves. That makes a threat to our freedom–whatever that means–a threat to our ability to do what we want, when we want. If you’re a functioning adult in society, you probably have never enjoyed this kind of freedom. It’s an existential threat. It’s like splitting the atom. When you’re done, not only do you not have the atom you started with, but you also have a giant, smoking crater.

The second problem is related. Because this is such an ill-defined fear, its meaning is highly dependent on the individual. When faced with an existential threat, it’s completely understandable that you’d imagine the worst possible outcome. However, just because that might be your first instinct doesn’t mean it’s how you need to make decisions.

I think that this ambiguity is purposeful. It plays off our worst collective fear, that the thing that defines us is being taken away. The assumption that any and all government rule is unacceptable ignores the fact that, for a lot of people, the type of freedom DeMint and his ilk want to preserve doesn’t exist. That freedom comes in the form of money.

Since we’re talking about Obamacare, let me use health care expenses as an example. A 2009 study found that, in 2007, 62 percent of personal bankruptcies were related to medical bills, and, perhaps most troubling, 60 percent actually had private health insurance. A new report from the Kaiser Family Foundation has shown exactly how much less people will be paying for insurance coverage, and it’s nothing to sneeze at. However, a recent study showed that living in poverty impairs your cognitive abilities, which illustrates that stress about money could lead to poor decision-making. While we often think of the poor as being poor because of their decisions, the picture might be much more complicated than that.

It would be great if everyone was financially secure. Having enough money gives you the freedom to do so much. You can quit that job you hate. You could throw yourself into a hobby that fulfills you but isn’t necessarily financially lucrative.

Most people, however, don’t even have that option. Without help, it can be hard for people to keep their heads above water. What freedom is DeMint trying to protect for them? Maybe a more robust social safety net–aka the Scary Nanny State–would result in more freedom for the average American, not less.

People like DeMint seem to have a fear that, if we use collective action to make life better and more secure for people, that we will fall down the rabbit hole to gulags and bread lines. They fear that any government action is bad action. This doesn’t have to be the case. All we have to do is look across the pond to see how a more socialist government would work. Is it perfect? Of course not. Are there lessons to be learned? If we can finally get over our outdated fear of socialism, I think that there probably are.

Freedom – of the press, of self-determination, of religion, etc. – is something that should be encouraged. However, socialism isn’t kryptonite. According to Freedom House, an independent democracy freedom watchdog, the United States has an incredibly high freedom rating. But so do the United KingdomIceland and Sweden. They all also have universal health care, yet none are Orwellian hellscapes.

I refuse to believe that it’s un-American to want to work together to make life better for everyone. I refuse to believe that just labeling something as socialist automatically makes it scary and evil. We’re better than that.

Read more: , ,

Photo Credit: Fibonacci Blue

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
1:16PM PDT on Sep 21, 2013


1:18PM PDT on Sep 19, 2013

Why do you people respond to David F? He is a conservative, which means he hates anyone different from him. You are not going to argue him out of that.

10:49AM PDT on Sep 18, 2013

Thanks for the morning laugh David F reading all your idiotic, half truths and pure fantasy posts.
I especially like the "100's of millions of Americans will die" You must have special talents to be able to see into the future.

5:38AM PDT on Sep 18, 2013

I really wish they would, it is annoying to constantly define socialism to conservative friends on facebook.

10:36AM PDT on Sep 17, 2013

Since Republicans seem to think that all Democrats are Socialist, can I proclaim that all Republicans are Fascists? Should the new sign be


As the Republicans move further to the right they may need to be reminded that the Political definistion of the far Right is Fascism. Of course, all this does is add more hatred to the political spectrum. But here is a quote as food for thought.

Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power. -- Benito Mussolini

9:39AM PDT on Sep 17, 2013

They're just self-hating Americans. We're a SOCIETY whether they like it or not. By definition, that implies socialistic institutions and practices. They just can't get over that FACT.

9:39AM PDT on Sep 17, 2013

Thank you for sharing.

9:36AM PDT on Sep 17, 2013

But evidently these folks really believe everything they disagree with is "un-American" and any action to help those who need help getting the basics in, shelter, a doctor for their sick "socialism". They won't stop using these terms because they really believe what they're saying is true. None are more blind that those who refuse to see.

7:19AM PDT on Sep 17, 2013

Vote all republicans out of office in every state at every opportunity.

2:28PM PDT on Sep 16, 2013

...and this one is absolutely priceless from David F.: "Law school 101, If the law is on your side exploit the law, if the facts are on your side, exploit the facts, if neither is on your side, pound the table."

So, just who is "pounding the table"? Care2 readers, just WHO does David F. remind YOU of, as he goes on his ideological rants, fueled by rightwing hypocrisy, fairytales and unmitigated nonsense? Picture him red in the face as he spews his bile at us so-called "socialists" and "liberals".....pounding the podium, with his little dark moustache under his nose, as he fear-mongers and rails at anything that his shriveled little mind cannot grasp.

All this from a blowhole who is so concerned that in the 1920s,30s the German economy was partly based on socialism (which took hold in Europe, by the way, when David's party threw the world into an economic Depression), and ignores totally the fact that the most important and overriding FACT about the Nazi's is that they were RIGHTWING!!! The very ancestor of David's current political beliefs. And to think that David's poor father fought against this sort of thing in WWII, only to have his son be a cheerleading baboon for it now. A family tragedy.

Again, David wouldn't know a true conservative if one shat on his empty head.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

There is another important aspect of this militarization of police forces across the country. Some speak…

Yes, we very much need to replace fossil fuel with renewable energy to try to reduce chances of massive…

ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.