START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
2,094,958 people care about Politics

Did the White House Even Try to Prosecute Wall Street Execs?

Did the White House Even Try to Prosecute Wall Street Execs?

Five years after the collapse of our economy, zero Wall Street power players have gone to jail. When everyone seems to know who to point the fingers at for this financial disaster, why is it that not one of these bigwigs have so much as been arrested or stood trial?

This is the question PBS’s Frontline decided to explore in a report this past Tuesday, which you can watch in full here. Speaking to a number of experts and insiders, the show found that the Department of Justice made minimal effort to bring those responsible for Wall Street’s fraudulent activity to justice.

The longstanding excuse from the White House is that there is not enough evidence to secure convictions against these executives. Although DOJ Criminal Chief Lanny Breuer claims the Obama administration would love to bring cases against those who committed such felonies, he insists he simply must back off without having a winning case.

While it seems fair to avoid losing trials, what is preposterous is the notion that out of hundreds of such potential cases against Wall Street heads, not a single one was deemed to have sufficient evidence. This excuse is proven even more ludicrous when Frontline interviews reporters who found employees who were willing to whistleblow to prove criminal intent, as well as people who worked for the DOJ who saw specific Wall Street cases with more than adequate evidence that were not pursued anyway.

Furthermore, it’s not as if the Department of Justice has a pristine reputation for only pursuing the most clear cut of cases. As Forbes points out, just last year, the DOJ prosecutors moved forward on a weak case against baseball pitcher Roger Clemens that resulted in a not guilty verdict. “The loss should be a wake-up call for the Department of Justice, which has failed at times to use prosecutorial discretion and good judgment in high-profile cases in recent years,” said the Forbes article, which outlines a whole series of DOJ misfires.

In other words, it is a joke for the White House to pretend it only pursues cases it can win. Skipping over all Wall Street felonies shows a disturbing bias. The DOJ can tell Frontline that it is merely a “professional decision”, but it is remarkable that it is choosing to exercise unprecedented “professionalism” in the face of Wall Street tossing aside ethics for the sake of profits.

Perhaps most telling was a speech Breuer gave saying he lost sleep at night contemplating the possible ramifications that prosecuting a large financial institution could have on the overall economy. When Frontline asked whether he should be taking into account outside factors when deciding cases to prosecute, Breuer replied affirmatively, citing a “responsibility” to bring negative consequences on those who had nothing to do with the banks’ mistakes.

However, the job of a federal prosecutor is to prosecute criminal activity, not worry about the fate of the banks. Besides, if Breuer is primarily concerned with the welfare of the general population as he suggests, it leaves the question why is he valuing a potential harm to Americans over the certain suffering that occurred because of bank fraud? Why let that go unpunished?

When no steps are taken to punish this criminal behavior, it sends a clear message to the elite: you are immune from prosecution and the rules do not apply to you.

For what it’s worth, the Justice Department has said that it does not like its portrayal on the Frontline story and refuses to cooperate with the show in the future. One would assume that it would continue to cooperate with the bankers, however.

Also, since the airing of Frontline’s report, it has been announced that Breuer will step down from his role with the Department of Justice. Maybe he can get a cushy Wall Street job as a thank you for his lack of vigilance like so many politicians before him!


Related Stories:

Washington’s Wall Street Sugar Daddies

With Elizabeth Warren on the Banking Committee, Will Wall Street Finally Pay Up?

Occupy Wall Street Finds Goldman Sachs Guilty in Mock Trial

Read more: , , , , , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
3:50PM PDT on Apr 9, 2013

Their ethics are in their pockets! Something ought to be done, to hold them accountable!

8:39AM PDT on Apr 2, 2013

Thank you Kevin, for Sharing this!

12:08PM PST on Feb 3, 2013

to many in washington get paid extra by wallstreet starting with the president and going through both the senate and congress, did you really expect anyone to get what they deserved

9:31PM PST on Feb 2, 2013

A good Dvd to watch is "Inside Job".

4:17PM PST on Feb 1, 2013

NOT. Great read,thanks.

9:22AM PST on Feb 1, 2013

Thank you Kevin, for Sharing this!

12:42PM PST on Jan 31, 2013

Don't listen to the paid liars.

10:55AM PST on Jan 31, 2013

Don, David is not paid... like many other c2 shills.

7:16PM PST on Jan 30, 2013

Don says don’t listen to paid liars. Then he jumps right to R Madcow, E-Gore, Blitz, and Sicko Moore. LOL

12:49PM PST on Jan 30, 2013

Don't listen to the paid liars.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Weak Animal Welfare Laws Encourage a Culture of Cruelty I agree- a few public executions of animal…

The treatment of these elephants by Zimbabwe is absolutely reprehensible and I hope that this cruel president…

grow big and strong budi. i hope you have a wonderful life.

meet our writers

Joanna Parkman Joanna Parkman is the Causes editorial intern for Care2. After a stint in Central America, she has... more
ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!