START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
4,422,135 people care about Environment & Wildlife

Dispersing Ain’t Cleaning: Ask Congress to Investigate Oil Spill-Dispersing Chemicals

Dispersing Ain’t Cleaning: Ask Congress to Investigate Oil Spill-Dispersing Chemicals

As of Friday, May 14, 517,000 gallons of chemical dispersant have been applied to the BP oil spill in the Gulf. The chemical, Corexit–also known as deodorized kerosene–is used to break up oil into tiny drops, which then sink underwater. The oil may sink, but it does not “go away.” Toxicology expert Dr.William Sawyer notes, “With respect to marine toxicity and potential human health risks, studies of kerosene exposures strongly indicate potential health risks to volunteers, workers, sea turtles, dolphins, breathing reptiles and all species which need to surface for air exchanges, as well as birds and all other mammals.” While the dispersants contain toxic elements, no one really knows their full potential effects. Mother Jones reports that the toxicity statements filed by Corexit’s maker acknowledge: “No toxicity studies have been conducted on this product.”

What is in Corexit? We don’t get to know. The exact ingredients are a protected trade secret under U.S. law as it currently stands. 
The New York Times notes that other dispersants may be as effective while being significantly less toxic. The Corexit advantage is that it is a child of the oil industry, manufactured by Nalco, which “was once part of Exxon Mobil Corp. and whose current leadership includes executives at both BP and Exxon.” If the company will not voluntarily reveal what it is dumping into open waters, it is time to force it to do so.

But isn’t it better to try to disperse the oil so it goes away?  Isn’t anything better than the oil? Protect the Ocean observes that “Oil is toxic at 11 ppm while Corexit is toxic at only 2.61 ppm.” So Corexit is about four times as toxic as the oil it is being applied to. Of course, there is way less Corexit being dumped than oil, but the relative toxicity argument doesn’t really “hold water” when you consider that we’re not dumping Corexit instead of oil, but in addition to it. The corollary to this is that if the oil “disappears” from human sight, then BP won’t be under as much pressure to clean it up. The dispersants could save BP a ton of cleanup costs and PR embarrassment. But the food chain (yes, including us humans) will not be spared, as the oil works its way onto our dinner plate, species by species.

The appalling disaster of the Gulf oil spill may have slim silver linings by discouraging future off-shore drilling and encouraging stricter regulation of the oil industry and of its government watchdogs. A Care2 petition here is urging Congress to require that the chemical makeup of these dispersants be revealed so that informed decisions can begin to be made, outside of the back rooms that are ruled by money and influence.

Please sign Care2′s petition to Reveal Dispersant’s Toxic Secrets:

See also: Cashing in on Disaster

Read more: , , , , , , , , ,


quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
10:04AM PDT on Apr 17, 2013

Thank you for sharing.

7:57AM PDT on Mar 18, 2013

Hopefully, these chemicals are really cleaning the spills. Even if there is some environmental damage, it certainly is less than what this done by the spill. We hope for toxicity tests to be conducted soon and for positive results. In addition, a little bit off-topic, there are many home cleaning products that have untested chemicals in them. Be careful when choosing such.

Daniel Davies
Domestic Cleaners London

3:40PM PDT on Sep 23, 2012


10:38AM PDT on Oct 2, 2011

Pretty cool post. It’s really very nice and useful post. Thanks for sharing this with us!it’s my first visit.

House Cleaning Service RI
House Cleaning Service NJ
Polacy za Granica

1:52PM PDT on Aug 9, 2010

it can't be secret he needs to patent the formula and it be pùblic, to every body see what are they using in the sea

9:25PM PDT on Jun 27, 2010


2:37PM PDT on May 31, 2010

Yes, they definately should disclose the formula! Petition already signed.

6:07AM PDT on May 25, 2010

these monsters are still literally poisoning the sea to boot!

6:01AM PDT on May 25, 2010

these backward morons

10:25AM PDT on May 23, 2010

why would anyone dump anything into the water knowing what adverse affects it will have on the water AND the marine life. the is intolerable. this is why going green is so important. it is not only for us,but for mother earth herself and ALL who inhabit her.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Hmmmmm. Solar power and wind power might be the answer. As to people losing their jobs - down thru…

Just ban the styrofoam. Nothing should have to consume that crap. IMO, we would then be screwing around…

Rock the baby for a treat. What a cute video.

ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!