START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
1,440,728 people care about Women's Rights

“Dumb Broad” Ads? They’re Still With Us

“Dumb Broad” Ads?  They’re Still With Us
  • 1 of 2


By Catherine Scott at the Women’s Media Center

Retro-sexist advertising may be presented as ironic, but it features the same, familiar images feminists rallied against decades ago, argues the author. What to do?

Compare two advertisements—both use a picture of a young, attractive, white woman to sell their product. Both women look sweetly perplexed and nervous. One, for the Mini Automatic, is taglined “For Simple Driving” and shows the model clutching a steering wheel and biting her lip, daunted at the task of driving a car. The other, for a Samsung camera, is taglined “Too Smart For Amy” with its model holding up the product and pouting adorably, eyes wide with confusion to show she is completely flummoxed by this complex piece of technology. Can you guess which one was made in 1970 and which one was released in 2012? Me neither.

An Ongoing Line of Anti-Women Advertising

Samsung’s campaign, released this month using British reality TV star Amy Childs, is the latest in an ongoing line of anti-woman adverts that have sparked online outrage. First we had Wodka Vodka’s “Escort Quality, Hooker Pricing” billboard beaming out over the Bronx. Another vodka company, Belvedere, swiftly followed suit with an online ad appearing to condone oral rape. More recently, there was Stüssy Amsterdam’s “Strip For Likes” campaign on Facebook, which turned its model into a “catwalk stripper” by promising that she would remove an item of clothing for every user who clicked the Like button.

The retro-sexism, supposedly ironic misogyny and blatant objectification that modern advertising indulges in reveals an ugly new problem in old clothing. Culture, media, and most importantly laws have changed since the days women were depicted as too stupid to drive, vote or open a bottle of ketchup, yet advertisers didn’t seem to get the memo. Or did they?

An Ad or a Gimmick?

Perhaps the flurry of outrage on Twitter, Facebook and all over the blogosphere is exactly what ad executives want. The Belvedere ad was taken down within the hour after a deluge of complaints—but who among us had even heard their brand name before they suggested physically forcing a woman to “go down easily”? Commenters on Stüssy Amsterdam’s Facebook page have called their campaign “tacky,” “asinine” and “gross,” but in statistical terms, these complainers are just more page traffic for Stussy. Whether we despise or approve of Samsung’s ad campaign, it’s got people talking, and if you believe that no publicity is bad publicity, then we’re all guilty—feminist objectors and drooling punters alike—of feeding a sexist company’s success.

Because the eye-poppingly offensive nature of these ads seems too blatant to be accidental, it seems that marketers actively want to go ahead with an ad that will offend, precisely because of the furor it will cause. Any marketing specialist worth their salt must know that sexist words or imagery alone won’t sell a product any more, but that the firestorm caused by them will bring in more free publicity than a 100-strong PR team ever could.

Related posts:

Dispatches From The War On Women: Just How Bad Is House VAWA Bill?

Transgender Rights Are A Feminist Issue

First “Feminist” Pixar Cartoon Has Released Its Trailer (VIDEO)


  • 1 of 2

Read more: , ,

Photo from Samsung ad via the Women's Media Center

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
6:33PM PDT on Sep 17, 2012

Yes those commercials are sexist and disgusting, but all you have to do is not buy their product. Buy a competing brand and send the label or packaging to the company.

But why is it no one seems troubled by the plethora of TV commercials where the man is a complete moron? My rule thumb is swap the characters, so the male replaces the female. If it's not overtly sexist then it's probably okay. But face it, folks, those ads have only one purpose and that's to sell a product. We can buy the stuff or buy someone else's. The power is in us.

6:07PM PDT on Sep 17, 2012

Ads are made to get our attention and have us remember them.If we find them insulting,we remember them,talk about them,spread the word about them.We DO exactly what the ads wanted us to do.Our only recourse is to not buy the product.Spread the word....quietly

3:44PM PDT on Aug 24, 2012

when will they see women as PEOPLE? with brains, feelings, and (admittedly) good looks (all together!)

8:05PM PDT on May 25, 2012

There are plenty of men who aren't as smart as a lot of women. This ad is discusting!

8:46PM PDT on May 20, 2012

There are also a large number of ads that portray men as being too stupid and helpless to do the simplest thing without the help of their wives or girlfriends. I think a good barometer of whether an ad is offensive is switch the gender and/or race and see if it would be acceptable. If the answer is no, then drop the ad.

6:30PM PDT on May 20, 2012

I have noticed a shift back to the 'dumb blonde or the dumb broad' to advertise goods. What we need to do is let them know that this is unacceptable by boycotting their products until this changes.

5:01PM PDT on May 20, 2012

That's as bad as that commercial where a bunch of chicks think we need to talk about what goes on in the bathroom. It would suit me fine if they just showed their product and discussed why it's a good product without all the fluff.

11:43AM PDT on May 20, 2012

What advertisers know, and most others overlook, is that 50% of the populace is below average intelligence - yet they have jobs, the vote and disposable incomes - AND it is much easier to sell beer, junk food, and cleaning products to dumb people than it is to sell to smart, educated people, so pitch your ads at the low end of the intelligence spread.

Increasingly, ads also show guys as dumb, and their spouse as the smarter one; such obvious sucking up to women is only going to work if it is aimed at the less-intelligent woman who still has to run a household and look after her children, and the goof she married.

Marketers will always target the easy mark. Even when they say they are targetting the upscale, "smart" consumer, it's still a con, since the mark always thinks s/he is the smart one.

8:52PM PDT on May 19, 2012

As long as women have breasts ,there will never be equality------read that somewhere !!!!!!

6:19PM PDT on May 19, 2012

I get tired sometimes thinking about what I've tried to do (marched a little, written some, talked a lot) and how much I'd thought feminism as a human rights issue was progressing years ago, and how this stuff keeps happening. Surely there are other ways to sell stuff and be funny.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

I'm so glad he's OK but he is very small. Is he too young to survive without his mom?

Thanks, I think we saw with the Syrian refugee crisis too, just what's been happening, when drought,…

Haha! Bright idea for a good cause, and they even look cute in their "swimsuits"!

ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!