START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,544,276 people care about Health Policy

Early Morning Smokers Have Greater Cancer Risk

Early Morning Smokers Have Greater Cancer Risk

 

It turns out that an early-morning cigarette could be much worse for your health than if you light up later in the day.  Researchers at the Penn State College of Medicine discovered that people who smoke their first cigarette within 30 to 60 minutes of waking up are more likely to get cancer than people who wait longer.  People who smoked within the first 30 minutes after waking were nearly twice as likely to develop lung cancer than people who waited an hour.

Experts said that this finding made sense, given that the first cigarette of the day can be a barometer for how addicted the smoker is.  ”A lot of heavily addicted smokers overnight go into withdrawal,” explained Michael Fiore, director of the University of Wisconsin Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention. ”By the time they wake up, their blood nicotine level has fallen substantially, and their neuroreceptors are screaming, ‘You gotta feed me.’”

Other researchers suggested that people who smoked early in the morning inhaled more smoke into their lungs.  This intense smoking could raise the exposure to cancer-causing chemicals.

Unfortunately, as Eric Hayden observes over at the Atlantic, people who are used to early-morning cigarettes may find it difficult to kick the habit.  He cites a review of studies from 2007 which explained that people who smoked first thing in the morning were more likely to see that first cigarette as “heavy, uninterrupted and automatic smoking.”  The earlier the cigarette, the more difficult it would be for the smoker to quit.

So perhaps this study isn’t so much of a surprise.  But the risks are disturbing, especially when they’re set out so explicitly.  If this isn’t a good reason to push back the morning cigarette — or, better yet, try to quit smoking — I don’t know what is.

Related Stories:

Eco-Friendly Cigarettes? What?

Kids Don’t Think Smoking is Dangerous

Big Tobacco Spent $100 Million Plus on CA Politics in the Past Decade

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Photo from Marco Gomes via flickr.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

10 comments

+ add your own
12:24AM PDT on May 28, 2013

I definitely respect and am grateful for your point on every single object.
green smoke electronic cigarette

5:27PM PDT on Aug 10, 2011

What's the difference?Smoking is bad at any time of day,so what if it's worse in the morning?Just quit!

4:15PM PDT on Aug 10, 2011

Every weekday morning, (on my way to the gym, passing by a suburb railway station) I saw a dozen of high school students (15-17 yrs old, in full school uniform) puffing away like a ship's funnel. I wonder how they could possibly concentrate on their studies through the rest of the day when their entire body and mind crave for nicotine.

I feel sad for them and sorry for their parents.

2:07PM PDT on Aug 10, 2011

When I smoked, the last thing I did before getting into bed was have a cigarette... and the first thing in the morning was light one up on the way to the potty.

Today's cigarettes are chemically far worse than the ones we could buy in the 5'50s and '60s - the nicotine content is enhanced, and many additives (even in the filters!) are far more dangerous than when we smoked unfiltered Pall Malls and Lucky Strikes or Camels, when I was a kid and a young adult.

Also, we have SO MUCH MORE POLLUTION - in the air, in the ground, in the water, in the furniture we buy and the carpets that are made of synthetic fibers. And the food absorbs a lot of contaminates from the roots up, while it's growing.

I agree... smoking is not good for any of us, but if 2nd hand smoke (and now 3rd hand smoke??!) is akin to child abuse and manslaughter to our friends, then why are any of us still living? Wouldn't we all have died by now, and solved our over-population problems, to boot?

10:14AM PDT on Aug 10, 2011

Back before the industrial revolution smoking was a normal occurrence and people didn't suffer from the health issues we have today, could some of it be all the chemicals that have been added to the tobacco? I believe the last count was over 3000. Maybe if someone was smoking a leaf that have been picked and dried directly from the plant it wouldn't be so bad?
I am not advocating smoking here (actually an ex-smoker), just wondering if maybe the chemicals are the problem...

9:55AM PDT on Aug 10, 2011

Worse than what?

9:30AM PDT on Aug 10, 2011

Hellooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo, smoking is bad for every living being on this planet.There are absolutely "NO" benefits to smoking except making the Tobacco industry very rich!

6:16AM PDT on Aug 10, 2011

I guess I'm dead. That frist smoke is only 2nd to peeing!!

2:05AM PDT on Aug 10, 2011

Thanks.

1:37PM PDT on Aug 9, 2011

If you're a regular smoker, then when you roll out of bed that's one of the first things you do. That's what I did! Thanks Amelia!~

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

I can't believe that five great companies agree with HSC study without compensation. Aren't they already…

And yet another well adjusted vegan coming to this thread and telling we wicked omnivores that our "lusts…

Denis : Logic - If toxins are suspected as a root cause for autism and vaccines contain known toxins…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.