START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
2,067,175 people care about Politics

Electoral Fallout From Arizona’s Immigration Bill

Electoral Fallout From Arizona’s Immigration Bill

As the dust settles in Arizona the political fallout from SB 1070 is just becoming apparent.  Well sort of.  What is apparent is that the bill is a mess, with the political consequences murky at best for most Republicans.  Think Progress has stayed on top of the head count, so to speak, providing some fantastic and detailed reporting on the aftermath of the Arizona bill.

So far the usual suspects like Rep. Steve King (R-IA) and Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) have offered a full-throttled support of the measure, while even others like Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) have suggested that the United States deport the U.S. citizen children of undocumented immigrants and repeal the 14th Amendment, just for good measure.   

But a trickle of opposition within the Republican party has begun.  Not only has the measure forced conservative stalwarts like Marco Rubio, Karl Rove, and Lindsey Graham to come out in opposition to the measure, it has highlighted that not all Republican opposition is grounded in outrage to the bill.  A good measure of it is grounded in old-fashioned political survival.

Take former Florida House Speaker and Republican senatorial candidate Marco Rubio.  His vocal opposition to the measure is grounded in a concern that it will probably encourage racial profiling by law enforcement in addition to an ideological sense that the bill represents an unfortunate expansion of governmental power, going so far as to say that “[t]hroughout American history and throughout this administration we have seen that when government is given an inch it takes a mile.”  This statement actually represents some pretty savvy politics on Rubio’s part insofar as he manages to articulate a libertarian fear of the overreaching police powers of the government and conflate them with a more traditionally republican anti-amnesty dig at the Obama administration.

Contrast Rubio’s approach with Karl Rove who also recently came out in opposition to the Arizona measure, not so much because of a fear of government overreach, but because of a concern that the measure could cost the Republican party seats in the midterm election and succeed in alienating, perhaps permanently, the only growing portion of the Republican electorate–Latino voters.  It’s not much of a surprise that Rove would be less concerned with the measure as a means of racial profiling or overreach by law enforcement–it was after all the Bush administration that ramped up immigration raids and pushed for the expansion of the Department of Homeland Security’s 287(g) program which allows local police to enforce immigration laws– efforts attributed largely to Bush’s failed efforts at tackling immigration reform during his presidency and measures which the Arizona law exacerbates.

And then there is Senator Lindsey Graham.  His tepid opposition to the measure reflects his own battle for political survival.  The Senator has faced attacks from William Gheen, head of the conservative anti-immigration group Americans for Legal Immigration (PAC) who demanded the Senator out himself as gay as a means of attacking Sen. Graham for his immigration positions or forcing a change in that position.

Sensing on the split, and the growing political implications for the Republicans if the split continues to a full-force rift, Democrats announced an outline of proposed immigration changes and appealed to Republicans to pursue comprehensive immigration reform as a bipartisan agenda item. 

Among the proposals suggested by the Democrats include enhanced border security, the creation of a new fraud-resistant Social Security card, and for those already in the country illegally, a series of penalties, taxes, and fees, in addition to passing a criminal background check would have to be satisfied before they would qualify for legal residency, and even then the qualification process wouldn’t start for at least eight years.

For Democrats, it may not matter if the proposals find their way into legislation before November so long as they can keep the focus, and the momentum, on the divide the measure is creating amongst their Republican counterparts.  If they are successful there then the rumors of their political demise come November 2010 may turn out to be greatly exaggerated.


Call on Congress to overhaul an immigration system that is unfair and failing all of us.

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

photo courtesy of hjl via Flickr

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
4:17PM PDT on Sep 13, 2012

Thank you for article.

4:16PM PDT on Sep 13, 2012

Thank you for article.

4:38PM PDT on May 14, 2010

An ounce of prevention is worth, um, what was it?

Actually, we're looking at the start of a wave consisting of TONS of attempted "cures," thanks to a problem that we could have forestalled long ago. Securing the borders, streamlining and strengthening immigration laws, or diplomatic pressure to help our neighbors to the south improve their and living conditions, just to name a few.

I recently heard an analogy that the immigration problem is like termites. We could have done some routine treatments when the house was relatively new - but we didn't. We could have fumigated later and been fine, but we didn't feel like it. Now we're gonna have to knock down entire walls and rebuild them if we ever want to have the place looking like new....
...but it goes even further. I'd like to add that all this time we INVITED the termites inside, because we wanted to exploit them for our own short-term benefit. Sure, most of the household wasn't aware of that fact, but we all saw the termites and never bothered to do something about it, or even find out why they kept coming.

Whether intentionally or out of negligence, we've CREATED much of the current situation, and now we need to take responsibility and find real, long-term, and especially fair and humane solutions before the house has to be demolished entirely.

2:37PM PDT on May 5, 2010

Check out what Eisenhower did...1954

12:44PM PDT on May 5, 2010

12:36PM PDT on May 5, 2010

Is this the law?? Since 1929 illegal entry into the United States is a federal crime, up to six months in prison for the first offense and 20 years for the second offense. Hiring illegal immigrants carries a maximum penalty under federal statute of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Wow. Can I pick and choose a few laws to break??

Can all the people in this country legally go commit a crime right now to support their family, and get away with it. NO.

Why do we even bother with laws any more. None are followed and the rest have loopholes for certain people to jump through and get away with crimes. A crime is a crime and the rest of us would be in jail.

11:44AM PDT on May 5, 2010

Glenna, those who are taking girls/children and women for the sex slave trade need to be on death row. That is an entirely different subject.

Nothing will stop everything completely, but needs to be dealt with from both sides. Those hiring and those coming in illegally. Simple.

9:42AM PDT on May 5, 2010

excuse this if there are duplicate posts...care2 doesn't seem to be working...
some interesting statistics and NOT just about Mexico....

9:30AM PDT on May 5, 2010

9:11AM PDT on May 5, 2010 didn't work.
Here's a link to some statistics about illegal immigration and it isn't just Mexico

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

I've always thought these pills were a really bad idea. Never tried any, never plan to.

@ Frances B.; good thing that animals don't get their meat at the supermarket. It's enough that humans…

Can't agree more.Get rid of the bells.

ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!