START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,307,920 people care about Politics

Enbridge May Be Unprepared For Spill Clean-Up

Enbridge May Be Unprepared For Spill Clean-Up

Two recent oil spills in Alberta have environmental risks of oil pipelines in the headlines, and now media have found documents showing that the Northern Gateway proposal was flagged for not including appropriate spill response plans.

The issue was brought up by officials at Aboriginal and Northern Affairs. The pipeline proposed by Enbridge crosses over the territory of several Aboriginal bands. Several of those communities have agreed to the pipeline in exchange for a 10 percent stake.

The Northern Gateway is meant to carry oil from the Alberta oilsands to the West Coast of British Columbia. It will cover over 1,200 km. The oil will then be exported, mostly to Asia.

With that long a pipeline, there are guaranteed to be issues.

Enbridge says they have addressed all the concerns raised by Aboriginal Affairs in 2010 and that they have always had an “aggressive emergency response.” No one at the Aboriginal and Northern Affairs could confirm that changes had been made to the plans for Postmedia.

Enbridge itself says the company meets or exceeds Canadian standards, but given the recent spill that wasn’t discovered until a competitor flew over the site, those standards don’t appear to be particularly high.

There are people across the country and especially in British Columbia fighting against the pipeline projects, not only because of the risk of spills but also because of the increased tanker traffic that may disrupt habitats along the route to Asia. Canadian Fisheries officials have raised concerns about the pipeline’s route across Alberta and BC, saying that Enbridge seems to be looking at the least expensive way to build rather than looking out for waterways.

The hearings about the pipeline being conducted through to April 2013 have been criticized by the Natural Resources Minister, Joe Oliver, who accused ‘radical‘ groups of trying to hijack the proceedings. More than 4,000 people applied to present at the hearings. In a grand irony, he accused these groups of being ideologically driven.

 

Related Stories:

5 Reasons Keystone XL Pipeline Is A Bad Idea

Oil Spills Expected If Keystone XL Pipeline Is Approved

Victory Against Ecosystem Destroying Pipeline

Read more: , , , ,

Photo Credit: ~Jen~

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

26 comments

+ add your own
7:54AM PDT on Jul 1, 2012

Why does anyone ever trust an oil company?
We need to cease our dependence on oil--but I guess I'm singing to the choir on this!

7:57PM PDT on Jun 20, 2012

I'm just impressed that Canada thinks this might be a problem. It's VERY clear that the technology DOES NOT EXIST to clean up a spill. Fortunately, the sun is free, and makes all the power we can use.

4:57PM PDT on Jun 20, 2012

What happens when a terroest blow it up ???????????????

3:13PM PDT on Jun 20, 2012

You don't say.

2:31PM PDT on Jun 20, 2012

Harper wants Northern Gateway passed esp. after Keystone XL was postponed. He became determined then to be able to sell Oilsands bitumen to Asia, those against Northern Gateway were labelled radicals and we now, thanks to the Con majority govt., we have Bill C-38 passed to make it easier for projects such as Enbridge to get the OK. BC which gains little from this proposal financially has a good record of rejecting environmentally damaging proposals though so many still are hopeful that at the end of the review process Northern Gateway will be rejected. There are some who say it would mean jobs and be good for BC's economy but in reality there are few long term jobs involved and the risks to the environment are just too great. Enbridge's poor record of cleaning up oil spills can be googled. Many who are speaking at the NG Review hearings are pointing to this poor record and how this company should not be allowed to build a pipeline through over a 1000 fish bearing streams in earthquake prone terrain and then let supertankers ship it through the dangerous Douglas Channel in the Great Bear Rainforest. Can't figure out why anyone thinks this makes sense.

11:47AM PDT on Jun 20, 2012

Canada is being sold out by the Harper Con government all for the sake of greed and power! They don't care what gets destroyed by this pipeline even if it's Canada and Canadians! They can escape but we can't!

11:40AM PDT on Jun 20, 2012

scary disregard for actual impacts?

11:31AM PDT on Jun 20, 2012

In Alberta, the spills are so prolific, that there's a serious to major spill every 1.4 DAYS. That's insane. It's inexcusable. This in a relatively flat & geographically calm area.

And now they want to run it over an area seriously prone to earthquakes and where there's more than a few volcanoes (it's not called the Pacific Ring of Fire for nothing!)... There's stupid, then there's playing Russian Roulette with a semi-automatic. As far as stupid ideas go, this one is a whopper.

11:12AM PDT on Jun 20, 2012

Hit them where it hurts - in the wallet.

9:50AM PDT on Jun 20, 2012

You mean they are exporting tar sands oil to China? I thought it was going to make America energy independent and drop our prices at the pump. Oh that's right, that was from a commercial brought to you by the Petrolium Institute. Silly me.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

Three cheers for the rescuers. So wonderful to hear that humanity did the right thing instead of following…

The U.S. is beyond being ready for a female President (I voted for Cynthia Mckinney in '08, Jill Stein…

People will always be judge-mental to others,dont matter if its from some old writings put together…

ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.