START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

Famed Climate Change Skeptic Changes His Mind

Famed Climate Change Skeptic Changes His Mind

Danish political scientist and statistician Bjorn Lomborg, alternately hailed and cursed for claiming that efforts to reduce carbon emissions were not worth the money, now suggests that combatting climate change should be the top global priority. For years, Lomborg did not deny manmade climate change; he simply did not think it important enough, according to his calculations, to do anything about. Now he has come up with a  new set of equations (and a new book) and is advocating that the world spend $100 billion a year to mitigate and deal with the results of carbon emissions.

“The point I’ve always been making,” he told the Guardian “is, it’s not the end of the world. That is why we should be measuring up to what everybody else says, which is we should be spending our money well.”

Lomborg, author of The Skeptical Environmentalist and other works, was never a climate change denier. He attracted a lot of publicity for suggesting in 2004 that fighting climate change would basically cost more than the benefit that would be attained, and that we’d be better off spending more money to cure HIV AIDS or other issues  He has since come out with new calculations calling for massive investment in clean energy technology and exploration of the controversial practices of geoengineering, where natural phenomena are manipulated to reverse greenhouse gas effects.

Bjorn Lomborg has been controversial for years.  A Lomborg debunking industry sprang up in the wake of his pronouncements, with websites, editorials and an entire book (Howard Friel and Thomas Lovejoy’s The Lomborg Deception) dedicated to exposing the faults in his logic and his research.  Yet he was also acclaimed for his “practical” approaches to the calculations around human life and risk in tackling global issues.  TIME magazine named him as one of the 100 most influential people of 2004, dubbing him the “Martin Luther of the environmental movement.” Even the left-leaning Guardian included him on their 2008 list of 50 people who could save the planet.” 

The Guardian quoted Lomborg this week: “This is not about ‘we have all got to live with less, wear hair-shirts and cut our carbon emissions’. It’s about technologies, about realising there’s a vast array of solutions.” He is right about the need for a multitude of approaches. The truly complex issue of climate change will not respond to dogmatic, single solutions from anyone, skeptic or believer. We need to pull together — now — and consider a variety of ways to tackle the issue, both technological and behavioral, including investment in research, clean energy technologies, conservation, carbon taxes, and more. Let’s hope we can make room for anyone, even a latecomer convert, to the big tent of those honestly working for a better world. 

Read more: , , , , ,

Photo: via iStockphoto

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
7:49PM PDT on Mar 29, 2014

Thank you.

7:48PM PDT on Mar 29, 2014

Thank you.

7:47PM PDT on Mar 29, 2014

Thank you.

7:46PM PDT on Mar 29, 2014

Thank you.

7:46PM PDT on Mar 29, 2014

Thank you.

8:43AM PDT on May 25, 2011

All he said was it wasnt worth the money, now that he is getting money from it, he is all for it. Follow the money, $100's of millions buys lot of cooperation for this scam.
Follow the money.....

3:09AM PST on Feb 28, 2011

Hopefully it will mean something and bring positive changes

3:32AM PDT on Oct 5, 2010

very nice

12:52PM PDT on Sep 16, 2010

I'm with Laurie on this one. I just want to find out and make sure others find out how to prioritize when taking care of the planet. One of my major concerns with reactions to reports of global warming is #1 on this list:

If we wreck the economy barking up the wrong tree, we will not have the investment-capital that we need for useful projects. Then again, if anthropogenic climate-change through CO2 emissions really is a problem, I want conclusive evidence to get the skeptics on board with a solution. (Skeptics also tend to be very effective problem-solvers.)

9:36AM PDT on Sep 14, 2010

You know it can be argued all day long, but the truth is we or noone will know for sure until it is too late. What is important is that we do realize that we are not taking care of our planet and that is not good and if global warming does happen who is going survive to say "I was right". We need to take care of our earth as well or better than we take care of ourselves and our families.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

I think we must learn of the animals they play with another animal no matter if the other animal is …

meet our writers

Lindsay Spangler Lindsay Spangler is a Web Editor and Producer for Care2 Causes. A recent UCLA graduate, she lives in... more
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK


Civil Rights


Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights


Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!