Family Awarded Historic $1.26 Million Settlement for Dog Killed by Police

Rodney Price, a rookie officer with the Anne Arundel County Police Department, was canvassing a neighborhood in February 2014, looking for witnesses to a burglary. He said he was confronted by Chesabar Vernon Goldennuts Reeves, aka Vern, a 4-year-old Chesapeake Bay retriever, in the front yard of the home of his owner, Michael Reeves.

Price shot Vern twice, killing the dog.

“He says, ‘I’m really, really sorry, I just had to shoot him,’ and I’m like, ‘You didn’t have to,’” Reeves told WJZ.

Reeves was right. Although Price claimed Vern was barking and running toward him, a necropsy showed that one of the bullets entered the dog’s side, indicating that Vern not facing Price but perpendicular to his gun.

After the shooting, former Anne Arundel County Police Chief Kevin Davis met with Reeves and his family, offering his condolences and promising a complete investigation into the incident. Meanwhile, Price was placed on administrative duty.

The internal investigation came to the conclusion that Vern was aggressive. Price was exonerated — and he’s still employed with the police department, the Capital Gazette reports.

Reeves filed a lawsuit against the police department. Finally, three years and three months after Vern was killed, the case went to trial — and the jury disagreed with the results of the police investigation.

During the three-day trial, Price admitted Vern didn’t bite or injure him before he shot the dog, and that he took no steps to humanely deal with Vern before pulling the trigger.

Jurors were asked specifically if Vern had attacked Price, and they all said no. They decided the shooting had violated Reeves’ constitutional rights and was committed with gross negligence.

Vern had been a member of the Reeves family since 2009. Their neighbor, Howard Seltzer, told WJZ he’d never heard him growl. “He’d bark, but I never heard him go after anybody,” he said. “He was a beautiful animal.”

In the largest settlement of its kind in U.S. history, the jury awarded Reeves and his family a $1.26 million settlement for the unnecessary shooting of their dog by a police officer. The settlement includes $500,000 in monetary damages since Reeves, a defense contractor, had to take a significant amount of time off from work. The $760,000 in damages was for the anguish caused by the senseless murder of their beloved pet.

Anne Arundel County officials have not commented on the settlement.

Every year, an estimated 10,000 pet dogs are shot and killed by police officers in the U.S. — that’s one every 98 minutes. To prevent these deaths, steps are being taken across the country to train law enforcement officers in how to humanely deal with dogs and other pets.

“The verdict sends a strong message to the police about … community expectations,” Reeves’ attorney, Cary J. Hansel, said in a statement. “The duty to serve and protect extends to our animal family members as well. Shooting Vern was senseless, unnecessary and unconstitutional.”

In January 2016, a jury awarded a Colorado man $262,500 for the wrongful death of his therapy dog, Chloe, who was shot and killed by a police officer. At the time, it was said to be the largest settlement of its kind.

Not only do these verdicts send a strong message to police officers, but they show that pets are worth much, much more than what can be considered their fair market value to their owners.

“I hope Vern’s case results in a butterfly effect,” says a status update on the Justice for Vern Facebook page, “sending small flutters that result in big changes in communities throughout the U.S.”

Photo credit: YouTube

230 comments

Margaret B
Margaret B34 minutes ago

They are going to train their police officers to "humanely" deal with animals. What about 'sensibly' dealing with animals first???

SEND
Janet B
Janet B1 hours ago

Thanks

SEND
Lenore K
Lenore K1 hours ago

ok

SEND
Arlene C
Arlene C10 hours ago

Merci laura

SEND
william Miller
william M19 hours ago

thanks

SEND
Nicole H

The killing of this dog was not necessary. He was not a threat to the police man. And that he is now still working for the police, be it in an administrative function, is certainly not to be applauded. He should have been fired. Immediately. Without further payment or indemnification. And that the Court now has made a settlement for the family, I can only appreciate and should be a very strong signal to all police officers who are very quick in using their guns. However, the amount of Usdoll. 1,26 million seems to me not fair and reasonable. How many people are, unfortunately being at the wrong spot at the wrong time, killed by a policeman never have reached this huge amount. So this means that a dog is now worth more than a human being, certainly if he is a black American. During street fights, or robberies in supermarkets or manifestations, many (yes many) totally innocent people are killed by policemen. I have never seen that the family received a settlement in such amount. I can certainly understand that many people are now either furious or extremely depressed because neither for their partner or child, the families received such settlement. What will be the result in the future ?? That settlement for family members will reach up to (say) $ 5,000 or more. And I can understand that for instance the settlement for a father, having 4 or 5 children, will be more that for a single man, only because the first man would have to

SEND
Janis K
Janis Kyesterday

Thanks for sharing.

SEND
Irene S
Irene Syesterday

Is there any sign, something like that could happen to the surviving dependants of one of the killed black people?

SEND
Callie R
Callie R2 days ago

These jurors rock, they absolutely did the right thing!

SEND
Brandy S
Brandy S2 days ago

Trigger happy cops will shoot at anything they want to, this includes your kids. It's time to put a stop to it.

SEND